Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
6.03s
(HC) Cross v. Kings County Sheriff
District Court, E.D. California · Feb 26, 2024
Frantz v. … (People v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 21, 2025
Id. at 4-5. 20 By Resolution 87-104 dated February 12, 1987, the TSD Board approved the assessment 21 in the Amended Engineer’s Report which the Board directed to exclude … Pincay v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLouisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission v. Becerra
District Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2020
However, a judge of this court granted a permanent injunction against its enforcement 2 as to American alligators on preemption grounds in Fouke Co. v. Brown, 463 F. Supp. 1142 (E.D. 3 Cal. 1979). … Trades 3 Council v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownColeman v. Standard Life Insurance
288 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 14, 2003
Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves, 185 F.Supp.2d 703 , 708 n. 6 (S.D.Tex.2002) (“Although [plaintiff] fails to use the term ‘promissory estoppel’ to describe its theory of recovery ... the Court assumes that [plaintiff … .”); Tappe v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 13, 2025
See Burton v. … Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Fimbrez v. Fresno County Jail
District Court, E.D. California · May 27, 2025
causes a constitutional tort, see Monell, 436 U.S. at 690; however, a city 23 or county may not be held vicariously liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under 24 the theory of respondeat superior, see Board … Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 25 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 26 1995).
Cited 0 timesUnknown324 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 9, 1970
Miller v. Western Board of Adjusters, Inc. (9th Cir. 1970) 427 F.2d 175 . … McCloskey v. Maryland (4th Cir. 1964) 337 F.2d 72, 74 ; Lee v. Tahash (8th Cir. 1965) 352 F.2d 970, 972 ; Ortega v. Ragen (7th Cir. 1954) 216 F.2d 561 ; Medlock v. Burke (E.D.Wis.1968) 285 F.Supp. 67, 69 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 7, 2024
See 20 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 10 Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 26, 2023
See Jackson v. … Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 14, 2022
CASE CAPTION ALABAMA MIDDLE ALM 3 22−00055 Brown v. … Cook Incorporated et al FLM 8 22−00173 Columbus v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2020
Corp. v. 14 Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554, 562-563 (2007) (citing Conley v. … Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & 19 Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979). But a state’s parole laws may give rise to a constitutionally 20 protected liberty interest. See Board of Pardons v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 27, 2021
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309, 1317 2 | (11th Cir. 2002); Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. … Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCourtesy Automotive Group, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California · Jul 20, 2022
23 enforcement of its asserted entitlement to attorneys’ fees and 24 costs following a decision in its favor by an Administrative Law 25 Judge (“ALJ”) selected by the California New Motor Vehicle Board … Notice, Ex. 1, 6 Prayer (Docket No. 6-3 at 35).)1 That petition is currently 7 pending in the matter of Subaru of America, Inc. v. California 8 New Motor Vehicle Board, No. 22CV010968.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 13, 2025
Martinez v. 13 Roberts, 804 F.2d 570, 571 (9th Cir. 1986); Chua Han Mow v. United States, 730 F.2d 1308, 14 1313 (9th Cir. 1984); Ruviwat v. Smith, 701 F.2d 844, 845 (9th Cir. 1983). … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 17 1990). Thus, “because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not jurisdictional.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2020
Brown, 463 F. Supp. 1142 (E.D. Cal. 23 1979). … Idaho Farm Bureau Federation v. 19 Babbitt, 58 F.3d 1392, 1397 (9th Cir. 1993) (citing Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. Watt, 713 F.3d 20 525, 527 (9th Cir. 1993)); see also Wash. State Bldg. & Const. Trades Council v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 9, 2023
This is insufficient. 4 | (See Doc. 13 at 6 (explaining that in Sandin v. … Thus, even if the RVR could 8 | affect him at a parole board hearing, this possibility is not sufficient to create a cognizable liberty 9 | interest.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLeonel Flores v. Warden of the California City Detention Facility, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 16, 2026
Doc. 17.1 26 27 1 Respondents also note that the parties completed briefing petitioner’s appeal at the Board of … petitioner Leonel Flores (A-Number: 078-061- 9 329) with a bond hearing before an immigration judge to be held within THIRTY (30) 10 days that complies with the requirements set forth in Singh v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 28, 2020
See Stephen 5 v. … Apr. 6, 2018) (denial of parole by the Board on the grounds that it renders 22 sentence so long it violates the Eighth Amendment states a cognizable claim; motion to dismiss 23 denied); Zaccardi v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 12, 2024
Brown v. … Brown, 533 U.S. at 1302. 7 B.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PS) McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High School District
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 7, 2022
Kadrmas v. Dickinson Pub. Schs., 487 U.S. 450, 461-62 6 (1988). Laws reviewed under this standard, including rules passed by a school board, are 7 presumed valid. Harrah Indep. Sch. Dist. v. … Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 572-73 (1975) (quoting 18 Board of Regents v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna