Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

1.23s

  • (PS) Wu v. McGuire

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 4, 2025

    Bruns v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin., 122 F.3d 1251, 23 1257 (9th Cir. 1997) (quoting Ivey v. … SA-CE- 10 2867E (Public Employment Relations Board) 11 Id. at 3. This ongoing litigation, both finalized and ongoing, presents obstacles to the current 12 litigation.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) CSPC Dophen Corporation v. Hu

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 29, 2021

    Goodyear 28 Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). … Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Kidwell v. Cisneros

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 25, 2022

    Nov. 3, 2017); see also Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979) (noting that 3 || Supreme Court rarely implies a private right of action under a criminal statute.) … See Nelson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Casto v. Newsom

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 2020

    Bell Atl. 2 Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554, 562-563 (2007) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 3 (1957)); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). … Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Carroll v. State of California

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 11, 2024

    The Court takes judicial notice 21 of the following district court cases, each of which counts as a “strike”: 22 (1) Carroll v. Brown, et al., No. 2:12-cv-02584-TLN-DAD (PC) (E.D. … Simon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. United States

    639 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 2, 1986

    Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803); WNCN Listeners Guild v. … Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board, 669 F.2d 1249, 1253 (9th Cir.1982) ("Exhaustion of administrative remedies is not required where the remedies are inadequate, inefficacious, or futile____”).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • (HC) Moreno v. Eaton

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 13, 2021

    See Rizzo v. Dawson, 778 F.2d 527, 531-32 (9th Cir. 1985); see 9 also Skinner v. … It would only, at most, alter the calculus of the Board’s discretionary decision.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Quizhpe Luis v. Warden of the California City Detention Center

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 24, 2026

    Prieto- 19 Romero v. … See, e.g., Chaney v. Lewis, 801 19 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC)Simmons v. Wuerth

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 9, 2019

    El-Shaddai v. Zamora, 833 F.3d 1036, 1047 (9th Cir. 2016). See also Simmons v. Edmund J. Brown, no. 28 2:17-cv-5860-TJH(E) (C.D. Cal.) … Brown, no. 5:18-cv-06890-LHK (N.D. Cal.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Washington v. Castillo

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 16, 2023

    See Ivey v. 9 Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 10 D. … “The State of California has not waived its Eleventh Amendment 1 1025-26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. 2 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Roberson v. People of the State of CA

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 19, 2022

    See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); 26 Boyd v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977). 8 | Here, according to petitioner, the state courts considered and rejected his claims.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Estate of Delion Johnson v. County of Sacramento

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2023

    Doe ex rel. 26 | Sisco v. Weed Union Elementary Sch. Dist., No. 13-01145, 2013 WL 2666024, at *1 (E.D. Cal. 27 | June 12, 2013) (citation omitted); see AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, 143 F. … Brown v. Alexander, No. 13-01451, 2015 WL 1744331, at *7 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC)Moore

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 16, 2025

    Doe I v. … Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 28 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Debeaubien v. State of CA

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 9, 2020

    E-mail: Amie.McTavish@doj.ca.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendants State of California; California Highway Patrol; CHP Lieutenant Todd 8 Brown … Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096-1102 (9th Cir. 2016); Kamakana 8 v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-80 (9th Cir. 2006). 9 4.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dustin Joseph v. Warden, FCI-Mendota

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 14, 2025

    Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 18 1990). Thus, “because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not jurisdictional.” Id. … Inc. v. Natural Resources 11 Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).” FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 12 U.S. 120, 132 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tiggs v. County of San Joaquin

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 2, 2025

    AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, 143 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1054 (E.D. Cal. 2015) (quoting 5 Whitmore v. … Molesky for J.M. v. Carillo, No. 1:22-cv-1567-ADA- 24 CDB, 2022 WL 17584396, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2022) (quoting Williams v. Super. Ct. of San 25 Diego, 147 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hillblom v. County of Fresno

    539 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 4, 2008

    Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 230 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). … Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist., 4 Cal.4th 820, 829 , 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 , 843 P.2d 624 (1993). A court first determines whether a statute “imposes direct liability” on a defendant public entity. Munoz v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • (PC) Mitchell v. Diaz

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 8, 2022

    Brown v. 20 Gilmore, 533 U.S. 1301, 1303 (2001) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). 21 II. … Wilkerson 26 v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bellah v. American Airlines, Inc.

    623 F. Supp. 2d 1183 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 2009

    .) *1185 On March 6, 1997, the National Mediation Board certified defendant IAM as the exclusive collective bargaining representative for TWA’s flight attendants. (UF ¶ 2.) … See Bliesner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • (HC) Rouser v. Unknown

    District Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2020

    Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2016). … See id. 12 (observing that a rules violation is just one of many factors a parole board may consider in 13 determining a prisoner’s suitability for parole). 14 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.