Case law

Erica Glaude, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Ahmad R. Fuller Jr. v. San Joaquin County, Stockton Police Department, and Does 1-25

District Court, E.D. California · May 8, 2026

In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the 14 court will (1) accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint, unless they 15 are clearly baseless or fanciful, (2) construe those allegations … Roper, 901 F.2d 1501, 14 1505-1506 (9th Cir. 1990) (to establish liability under § 1983, plaintiff must establish that 15 defendant’s conduct was both the cause in fact and the proximate cause of the constitutional 16

(PC) Fairchild-Littlefield v. Amezcua

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 16, 2022

The staff had confirmation and refused to act, which 26 Plaintiff believes qualifies as deliberate indifference, and her being kept in the cage knowing she 27 had a medical condition causing her extreme pain and for which … Defendant CCWF – Eleventh Amendment Immunity 5 The Eleventh Amendment to the U.S.

(PC)Seymour v. Shirley

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 17, 2025

immunity. 28 The Court need not address these other arguments as the arguments discussed below dispose of this case. 1 insufficient, and that Defendants failed to provide an expert opinion by a Toxicologist. … Accordingly, the Court finds McClellan is qualified to issue the 12 expert opinion that Plaintiff “could not produce acute or chronic health effects associated with 13 TCP.”

Randall

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 25, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 14 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 15 making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion 24 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 25 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Collado v. Urambula

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 16, 2019

Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 613–14 (9th Cir. 2016)). 17 For this reason, Plaintiffs have not established diversity jurisdiction. 18 C. … The July 25, 2019 order was mailed to the only address on file for Plaintiffs, and the 8 deadline established by the order has passed. (ECF No. 3.)

Badger Daylighting Corp. v. Dig Alert Done Right, LLC

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 2, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 24 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 25 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly designated before the 26 material … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualify for 9 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify, to the extent 10 reasonably practicable, the protected portion(s) (e.g.,

Wallace v. Lemoore PD

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 12, 2021

“The requisite causal 18 connection may be established when an official sets in motion a ‘series of acts by others which 19 the actor knows or reasonably should know would cause others to inflict’ constitutional 20 … immunity. 15 B.P. v.

Williams v. The People of the State of California

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 28, 2022

Cole, 4 Cal.App.4th 3 1327, 1335 (1992); Awabdy, 368 F.3d at 1068 (“An individual seeking to bring a malicious 4 prosecution claim must generally establish that the prior proceedings terminated in such a manner 5 as … and there are allegations that the prior 9 proceedings were instituted as the result of fraudulent conduct, a malicious prosecution plaintiff is 10 not precluded from maintaining his action unless the defendants can establish

Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. PIV Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 5 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 17 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Barnes v. Hanford Superior Court Judge

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 3, 2020

This judicial immunity insulates judges from suits 17 brought under section 1983. … The decision whether 7 to release a defendant on bail or detain him is clearly an act within the judge’s jurisdiction and 8 authority.

Washington v. California City Correction Center

871 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, E.D. California · May 10, 2012

As noted above, to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, “the plaintiff must provide evidence that (1) he was a member of a protected class, (2) he was qualified for the position he sought or was performing competently … Regardless of whether the allegations were true or false, they clearly had adverse consequences for Plaintiffs employment.

(PC) Hoffmann v. Lassen County

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 20, 2020

meaningful legal research to oppose defendants’ motions. 28 1 In an order filed September 21, 2020, this court first noted that plaintiff failed to establish … 7 (c) If an inmate requested legal research on the subject of qualified immunity, 8 what specific materials would he receive?

Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California · May 29, 2024

Except as otherwise provided in this Order, 9 or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for 10 protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 18 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 19 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Maurice Daronte Davis v. Jeff Lynch, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 10, 2026

Thus, § 1915(e)(2) 15 allows judges to dismiss a claim based on factual allegations that are clearly baseless, such as 16 facts describing “fantastic or delusional scenarios.” … To succeed on an Eighth Amendment claim predicated on indifference to 23 medical needs, a plaintiff must establish that: (1) he had a serious medical need and (2) the 24 defendant’s response to that need was deliberately

Meira Davis v. MacuHealth Distribution, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 5, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 6 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7 … This provision is not intended to modify 17 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 18

(PS) Herships v. CA Sup Ct County of Yolo

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2024

In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the court will 1 (1) accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint, unless they are clearly 2 baseless or fanciful, (2) construe those allegations … No amendment could overcome the deficiencies in the 28 complaint to establish subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, the complaint should be dismissed 1 || without leave to amend. 2 | LU.

Jasmine Vineyards, Inc. v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 15, 2025

“In the context of expert 18 scientific testimony, the Ninth Circuit has explained that the proponent meets this burden by 19 offering ‘some objective, independent validation of the expert’s methodology’ establishing … Plaintiff argues that such knowledge, skill, and experience qualifies Mr.

Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 28, 2020

If only a 20 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 21 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 22 … If only a portion or portions of the material 2 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Percil

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 10, 2026

While plaintiff’s panic attacks and other ailments are likely sufficiently serious to be 6 constitutionally actionable, the FAC does not establish a causal link between them and 7 defendant’s actions. … than negligent”).2 19 While the undersigned is willing to entertain that plaintiff’s factual allegations show “more than 20 negligence,” Gordon, 888 F.3d at 1125, despite his use of the term, ultimately, the lack of clearly

Seever v. City of Modesto

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 5, 2022

However, “[t]he line between ‘isolated or sporadic incidents’ 10 and ‘persistent and widespread conduct’ is not clearly delineated.” Warkentine v. Soria, 2014 WL 11 2093656, at *6 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2014). … Accordingly, whether 16 Defendants have immunity depends on whether the immunity under § 821.6 applies to the MPD 17 officers’ actions that give rise to Ms. Ruiz’s IIED claim.