Case law

Brown v. McMahon

722 F. Supp. 1573 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 11, 1989

N.L.R.B. v. United Food & Com’l Wkrs. Union, 484 U.S. 112 , 108 S.Ct. at 421 ; Smith v. Heckler, 820 F.2d 1093, 1094 (9th Cir.1987). See also Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … Accord Todd v. Norman, 840 F.2d 608, 611 (8th Cir.1988). 4 . The Eighth Circuit in Todd v.

Cauchi v. Brown

51 F. Supp. 2d 1014 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 21, 1999

See, e.g., Land v. … Brown’s status. Plaintiff also contends that M.

Brown v. County of San Joaquin

601 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 22, 1985

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Powderly v. Schweiker, 704 F.2d 1092 (9th Cir.1983). … Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499-500 [ 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 ]; Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 [ 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 ]. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 571-72 , 92 S.Ct. at 2705-706 .

(PC) Peyton v. Cates

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 16, 2021

Brown v. Plata 16 Finally, to the extent Plaintiff is asking for immediate release based on the decision in 17 Brown v. … App’x 603, 604 (9th Cir. 2014) (“[T]he 23 decision in Brown v.

(PC) Peyton v. Cates

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 30, 2021

Brown v. Plata 8 Finally, to the extent Plaintiff is asking for immediate release based on the decision in 9 Brown v. … App’x 603, 604 (9th Cir. 2014) (“[T]he 15 decision in Brown v.

Brown v. BAKER HUGHES INC.

433 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, E.D. California · May 17, 2006

See Malhiot v. S. Cal. Retail Clerks Union, 735 F.2d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir.1984); Ellenburg v. … Plaintiff also cited Allen v.

(PC) Sanford v. Eaton

District Court, E.D. California · May 2, 2022

Brown v. … See also Peyton v. Brown, 584 F. App'x 603, 604 (9th Cir. 2014) (“[T]he decision in 26 Brown v.

Mansourian v. Board of Regents

816 F. Supp. 2d 869 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 3, 2011

Cohen v. Brown Univ. (“Cohen II”), 101 F.3d 155, 165 (1st Cir.1996). … Cohen v. Brown Univ. (“Cohen TV"), 101 F.3d 155, 176 (1st Cir. 1996).

NAT. ASS'N OF OPTOMETRISTS & OPTICIANS v. Brown

709 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 28, 2010

Nat'l Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. Brown ( "Brown" ), 567 F.3d 521, 528 (9th Cir. 2009). … Brown, 567 F.3d at 527 . The Court of Appeals continued to apply Exxon Corp. v.

H. J. Justin & Sons, Inc. v. Brown

519 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 21, 1981

Church of Scientology v. U. S. Dept. of Justice, 612 F.2d 417, 421 (9th Cir. 1979). … In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona ex rel.

(HC) Fields v. California Department of Corrections

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2020

Ylst v. … See People v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 6 Cal. 4th 497, 508 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. Mayle, 283 F.3d 1019, 1040 (9th Cir. 2002) (vacated and 7 remanded on other grounds in Mayle v.

Stratton v. Oroville City Elementary School District

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 18, 2025

Taylor v. … Juarez v. Boy 18 Scouts of America, Inc., 81 Cal. App. 4th 377, 395 (1st Dist. 2000) (disapproved on other grounds 19 by Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 222 n.9 (2021)).

Board of Education v. Holland

786 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 2, 1992

Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 179 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3037 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … The IEP "is prepared at a meeting between a qualified representative of the local educational agency, the child’s teacher, the child’s parents or guardian, and where appropriate, the child____” Board of Educ. v.

Brown v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 26, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION WILLIAM BROWN

Rivas v. California Franchise Tax Board

619 F. Supp. 2d 994 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 23, 2008

INTRODUCTION This case arises out of a February 23, 2006 search of Plaintiffs’ Michelle Rivas’ (“Rivas”) and Thomas Kaschak’s (“Kaschak”) residence, conducted by California Franchise tax Board (“FTB”) agents on February 23 … Hydrick v. Hunter, 500 F.3d 978, 988 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.1989)).

Pearline Jackson v. The State and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 24, 2025

Dittman, 191 F.3d at 22 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. 23 Cal. … Dep’t. of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding California Department of 24 Corrections and California Board of Prison Terms entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity). 25 Plaintiff cannot pursue claims

Berg v. California Horse Racing Board

419 F. Supp. 2d 1219 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 2, 2006

See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978) (the employer’s burden is satisfied if [it] simply “explains what [it] has done”). … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

McDowell v. Sacramento Local Board Group

264 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 21, 1967

This is well-recognized law (accord, Watkins v. … See King v. State of California, 356 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1966); Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964).

Rice Corp. v. Grain Board of Iraq

582 F. Supp. 2d 1309 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2008

See generally Universe Sales Co., Ltd. v. … Plaintiff argued for the first time during oral argument that the “substantial compliance” standard applies to service of process on the Grain Board. See Straub v. A P Green, Inc., 38 F.3d 448 (9th Cir.1994).

Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms

376 F. Supp. 2d 975 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 15, 2005

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Hewitt v. … Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 371, 377-78 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 12 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 ; see also I.N.S. v. St.