Opinion

Brown v. Newsom

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Kellie Walters (SBN 342755)

Eric Sapp (SBN 240372)

Legal Services for Prisoners with Children

4400 Market Street

Oakland, CA 94608

(415) 625-7043

kellie@prisonerswithchildren.org

Richard Tan (SBN 327366)

Law Offices of Richard Tan

725 Washington St.

Oakland, CA 9460712

(510) 345-3246

richard@richardtanlaw.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

WILLIAM BROWN, AKA ) No. 2:24-cv-01281

MINISTER KING X, & ALL OF US )

OR NONE, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

) MOTION TO REDACT EXHIBIT A

Plaintiffs, ) OF THE FIRST AMENDED

) COMPLAINT

Vs. )

) Honorable Daniel J. Calabretta

GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM, )

SECRETARY JEFF MACOMBER, )

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF )

CORRECTIONS AND )

REHABILITATION, JOHN DOES 1- )

10, and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter coming before the court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Redact

Exhibit A of the First Amended Complaint (Dkt # 63), all parties being duly notified,

it is hereby ordered that:

1. Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Redact Exhibit A of the First Amended

Complaint is GRANTED;

2. Exhibit A of the First Amended Complaint shall be SEALED until

further Order of the Court;

3. Access to the sealed document shall be limited to counsel for the plaintiff

and counsel for the defendants; and

4. Plaintiffs shall file the redacted copy of Exhibit A within seven (7) days

of the entry of this order.

The Court has considered the factors set forth in

, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) and finds that,

for the reasons stated in the Unopposed Motion to Redact, sealing the identified

document serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds that, in the absence

of closure, the compelling interests identified by the plaintiff would be harmed.

In light of the public filing of the Unopposed Motion to Redact, the Court further

finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the exhibit that would

adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 25, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta

THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.