Case law

(PC) Montgomery v. Culum

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2023

Brown. … Brown 9 Plaintiff may be alleging that defendants violated the court decree issued in Coleman v. 10 Brown when they failed to provide him with mental health care.

(PS) Rhee v. Alvarez

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 21, 2022

RHEE, No. 2:18-CV-0105-KJM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. … Defendants Biggs-Gridley Memorial Hospital dba Orchard Hospital, Stark, 28 James Brown, Jr., Storne-Piazza, Starkes, Buttacavolli, Harris, Margaret Isley Brown, Becker, 1 | Redfield, Cunha, Engen, Cota, and Kullar are

Estate of Frank Carson and Georgia DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 28, 2021

Swierkiewicz v. … See Destfino v.

(PC)Purdagone

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 5, 2025

Defendant Rodriguez would direct Plaintiff to “go into the 14 Board of Parole Hearing room (BPH) with him” and lock the door once they entered. (Id. at 6, ¶ 15 17). … Ctr. v.

(PC) Mills v. Jones

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 12, 2022

See Brown v. Reif, No. 2:18-CV-01088 KJM CKD P, 2019 WL 28 1 989874 at *2 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2019); L.R. 302(c)(17); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). … See Ramos v. Mayfield, No. 21-cv- 26 1036-JLT-EPG, 2022 WL 95222, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2022); Brown, 2019 WL 989874, at 27 *2.

(PC) Montgomery v. Moreno

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 24, 2022

See, e.g., Mancinas v. Brown, No. 2:16-cv-2806-EFB P, 2018 U.S. Dist. 3 LEXIS 33781 at *6 (E.D. Cal. … See Hallett v.

DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 28, 2021

Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 7 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (quoting Doe v. United States, 58 F.3d 494, 497 (9th Cir. 1995)); 8 see also Gardner v. … See Destfino v.

Clarissa Jewels Mendoza v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2026

See, e.g., 8 Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015). … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494; 8 see also Coloma v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 2:17-CV-0310-DMC, 2018 WL 5794517, at *9 (E.D. 9 Cal.

(HC) Brownlee v. Martinez

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2024

However, the petition does not mention the parole board 4 proceeding at all. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v.

(PC) Shockner v. Soltanian

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2022

Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2002). For the following 7 reasons, the Court declines to consider Plaintiff’s new argument for equitable tolling raised in his 8 objections. … See Fink v. Shedler, 192 F.3d 911, 916 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pappion v. R-Ranch Property Owners Ass'n

110 F. Supp. 3d 1017 · District Court, E.D. California · May 21, 2015

Plaintiff filed the instant action against Defendants R-Ranch Property Owners Association (“POA”), a California Non-Profit Corporation, as well as individual members of the POA Board, Hal Glover, Mark Grenbemer, John Crosby … The R-Ranch POA is controlled by seven elected owners (the “Board”) who are tasked with operating and maintaining the premises. (ECF No. 24-2 at ¶ 10.)

Konrad Alexander Stimson v. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 27, 2026

See Tucker v. … IX claim against Defendants California ] Commission on Teacher Credentialing and Arizona State Board of Education be 2 STAYED via Younger abstention pending resolution of the matters Stimson v. 3

Brandt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

693 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 2, 1988

Board of Airport Com’rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus Inc., — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 2568, 2572 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987) (citing Members of the City Council of City of Los Angeles v. … New Motor Vehicle Board of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96, 107 , 99 S.Ct. 403, 410-411 , 58 L.Ed.2d 361 (1978) (quoting Lincoln Federal Labor Union v. Northwestern I. & M.

United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries

759 F. Supp. 2d 1215 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 11, 2011

The standard of review under § 636(b)(1)(A) is highly deferential; see United States v. … Grimes v. City & County of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 241 (9th Cir.1991). B.

Harper v. Charter Communications, LLC

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 13, 2021

See 17 Alcantar, 800 F.3d at 1056; Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 28 Cal. 18 App. 5th 824, 834-36 (2d Dist. 2018); Khan v. Dunn-Edwards Corp., 19 19 Cal. … See Esparza v. Safeway, Inc., 36 Cal. App. 5th 42, 62- 15 63 (2019); Brown, 28 Cal. App. 5th at 840-42. Although Williams 16 v.

Ctr. for Competitive Politics v. Harris

296 F. Supp. 3d 1219 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 30, 2017

Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign , 459 U.S. 87 , 88, 103 S.Ct. 416 , 74 L.Ed.2d 250 (1982) ; NAACP v. Alabama , 357 U.S. 449 , 462-63, 78 S.Ct. 1163 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1488 (1958) ; see also John Doe No. 1 v. … Compare John Doe 1 v.

Hoeg v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 2, 2024

(See Kory v. … See Bogan v.

(SS) Mangrum v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 17, 2023

Warre v. Comm’r, 439 F.3d 16 1001, 1006 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Brown v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 535, 540 (8th Cir.2004); Lovelace v. 17 Bowen, 813 F.2d 55, 59 (5th Cir.1987); Odle v. … Molina v.

National Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. Lockyer

463 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 6, 2006

In California, an eye examination must be performed by an optometrist, licensed by the California Board of Optometry, see Cal. … The Department of Consumer Affairs has supervisory powers over the Board of Optometry, which has the power to discipline optometrists, and the Medical Board of California, which has the power to discipline opticians. .

(PC) Victory v. Allison

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2023

Jones v. … June 16, 2021) (plaintiff must allege more than generalized 11 allegations regarding what the warden did not do to control the spread of COVID-19); Maney v. 12 Brown, 464 F. Supp. 3d 1191, 1197 (D.