Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
3.02s
Northwestern Fruit Co. v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.
665 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 24, 1986
Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc., 444 U.S. 232, 246 , 100 S.Ct. 502, 511 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980); *873 Hospital Building Company v. … Hahn, Inc. v. Codding, 615 F.2d 830, 834 (9th Cir.1980); Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America NT & SA, 549 F.2d 597, 602-03 (9th Cir.1976).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 8, 2025
Greenholtz v. … See 26 Ramirez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 12, 2026
Harris v. … Reynolds v. Potts, 8 F.3d 29 (9th Cir. 1993) (citations omitted) (unpublished); see Crofton v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 11, 2023
12 EDMUND BROWN, FINAL JUDGMENT 13 Defendant. … The permanent injunction issued in Fouke Co. v. Brown, 463 F.Supp. 1142 (E.D. Cal. 11 1979) remains in force but is modified to read as follows: 12 a.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PS) Newson v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services
District Court, E.D. California · Dec 12, 2024
July 14, 2023) (“[C]ourts across the country have held that [Section 16] does not 17 provide plaintiffs with a private right of action and therefore does not establish federal question 18 jurisdiction”); Brown v. … Part 226, issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal 10 Reserve System, implements TILA. See 12 C.F.R. § 226.1(a).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PS) Sarkis v. Yolo County Public Agency Risk Mgt. Ins. Authority
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2024
Bodett v. … The Yolo Board hired plaintiff in April 2019 and after the Board learned that 28 plaintiff was accused of sexual assault, it elected to terminate him.
Cited 0 timesUnknownReinhardt v. Gemini Motor Transport
869 F. Supp. 2d 1158 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 25, 2012
The on-board computer system allows managers to virtually ride with every driver at all times. … Finally, Gemini drivers are required to immediately input into the on-board computer system every change of status in the course of a day, including the exact timing and nature of every stop.
Cited 16 timesPublishedPacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
479 F. Supp. 2d 1113 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 16, 2007
Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 412 (5th Cir.1981); Mortensen v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3rd Cir.1977). … See Sparta Surgical Corp. v. NASD, 159 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir.1998) (citing Easton v. Crossland Mortg. Corp., 114 F.3d 979 , 982 (1997)). This exception was first set out in the seminal case of Sparta Surgical Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished298 F. Supp. 3d 1323 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 31, 2018
Id. ; Cf Orn v. … See Dominguez v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 5, 2025
Swarthout v. … Wilkerson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 22, 2025
See Brown v. Atchley, 76 F.4th 862, 872-73 & n.1 (9th Cir. 2023). … P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988); Orona v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 24, 2026
Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133–34 (9th Cir. 2012) 26 (quoting Porter v. Jones, 319 F.3d 483, 491 (9th Cir. 2003)). … To Defend Affirmative Action v. 16 Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir. 2012)). 17 The Circuit’s opinion in Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Quebec v. 18 Harris offers a
Cited 0 timesUnknownVideo Gaming Technologies, Inc. v. Bureau of Gambling Control
621 F. Supp. 2d 918 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 16, 2008
Inst., 384 F.3d 791 , 792 (9th Cir.2004) (“[A]lthough the State makes a valiant attempt to persuade us that the Supreme Court’s decision in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. … .”); Miranda B. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTavares v. Cargill, Incorporated
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 11, 2023
Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 657 F.3d 970, 983 (9th Cir. 2011); see also 7 Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 5:09-CV-03339 EJD, 2012 WL 3672957, at *4 (N.D. Cal. 8 Aug. 24, 2012), aff’d, 651 F. … No necessary information as posted solely on any bulletin board, 12 and no one was required to read the bulletin board to be able to perform their job.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 21, 2026
In 23 the motion, Plaintiff requests an order of protection directing the California Department of 24 Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Departmental Review Board (“Board”) to place him and keep 25 him in the restricted … Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 491–93 (2009); Mayfield v. 23 United States, 599 F.3d 964, 969 (9th Cir. 2010).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 9, 2025
(ECF No. 12 at 42-43.) 2 However, upon further review it was determined that Plaintiff’s eligibility date was not based on 3 the appropriate in-prison offense, and the Board of Parole Hearings vacated the decision dated … Brown, 2020 WL 4818566, at *2 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 7, 2025
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570–71 (1972). Plaintiff has not failed to 2 do so as he alleges only that his personal property was confiscated because of the prison “shake 3 down.” (ECF No. 1 at 8-9). … Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 483 P.3d 159, 164 (Cal. 2021) (quoting Nally v. 19 Grace Cmty.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 14, 2022
11 FABIAN HANCY MICHEL, No. 2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. … Coleman v. Brown, 2013 WL 6491529, at *1 28 (E.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 29, 2025
Brown v. California Dep't of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 1 752 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Will v. Mich. … Gov’t Code § 900.6 (defining “State” as “the State and any office, officer, department, 21 division, bureau, board, commission or agency of the State claims against which are paid by 22 warrants drawn by the Controller
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna