Opinion

(PC) Michel v. Gipson

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Nov 14, 2022
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 FABIAN HANCY MICHEL, No. 2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER

14 CONNIE GIPSON, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On October 24, 2022, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed without

21 leave to amend because he failed to identify a cognizable due process violation in connection with

22 the December 6, 2020 rules violation report. (ECF No. 25 at 6.) On November 7, 2022, another

23 inmate prepared objections for plaintiff, which are signed by plaintiff, stating that because

24 plaintiff is receiving mental health care services at the EOP1 level of care and has been identified

25

1 The Mental Health Services Delivery System Program Guide for the California Department of

26

Corrections and Rehabilitation provides four levels of mental health care services: Correctional

27 Clinical Case Management System (“CCCMS”); Enhanced Outpatient (“EOP”); Mental Health

Crisis Bed (“MHCB”) and inpatient hospital care. Coleman v. Brown, 2013 WL 6491529, at *1

28 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013).

1 | as developmentally disabled, plaintiff did not understand what the court required in its prior

2 || screening orders. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff seeks leave to file a third amended complaint.

3 As noted in the court’s prior screening orders, it is unclear plaintiff can rectify the

4 || pleading defects by amendment. However, in an abundance of caution, plaintiff is granted leave

5 || to submit a third amended complaint. However, in the interim, the findings and recommendations

6 || shall remain pending. If plaintiff fails to file a third amended complaint, the findings and

7 || recommendations will be referred to the district court for review and adoption.

8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date

9 || of this order to file a third amended complaint. Failure to file such pleading may result in the

10 || dismissal of this action.

11 | Dated: November 14, 2022

Aectl Aharon

13 KENDALL J. NE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14

/mich2178.lta

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.