Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

0.37s

  • (PC) McKenna v. Cisneros

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 11, 2023

    See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 4 In addition, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to 5 make plaintiff’s amended complaint complete. … Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. State of Cal.

    639 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 1, 1986

    California notes that such delays were permitted in a somewhat different context in Midway Airline v. County of Westchester, 584 F.Supp. 436 (S.D.N.Y.1984) and British Airways Board v. … The United States relies on United States v. Composite Board of Examiners, 656 F.2d 131 (5th Cir.1981) and argues that Younger abstention is never applicable when the United States seeks to assert a federal interest.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger

    603 F. Supp. 2d 1275 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 26, 2009

    In Cooper v. … In Hook v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • (PS) Wayne v. Sierra County

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 20, 2025

    Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 21 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(c), 1962(c)). … Ctr. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Travelers Insurance Co. v. Plaza Family Partnership (In Re Plaza Family Partnership)

    95 B.R. 166 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 13, 1989

    See also In re Brown, 21 B.R. 701 (1st Cir.B.A. P.1982). … It cites to an Eighth Circuit case, Dahlquist v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • S & M Investment Co. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

    702 F. Supp. 1471 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 7, 1988

    Plaintiff lost when the motion before the board to approve the requested extension failed. … The court has also considered plaintiffs post hearing citations to Herrington v. Sonoma Co., 834 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir.1987), and Barancik v. Co. of Marin, — F.2d - (9th Cir.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Absolute Urethane

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 19, 2019

    Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 5 | (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). … Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th 8 | Cir. 1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Andrus

    88 F.R.D. 617 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 10, 1980

    Miss Universe, Inc. v. *619 Flesher, 605 F.2d 1130 , 1137 (9th Cir. 1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (PC) Singh v. Sacramento County

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 15, 2023

    See 13 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Constar, Inc. v. Plumbers Local 447

    568 F. Supp. 1440 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 2, 1983

    See, e.g., International Ass’n of Ironworkers, Local 433 v. NLRB, 598 F.2d 1154, 1156 (9th Cir.1979) (“The guidelines that the Board established in ... … See Fulton v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • (PS) Castro v. Castilo

    District Court, E.D. California · May 15, 2024

    Le v. Brown, 2021 WL 4940862, n.1 (D. Or. Oct. 22, 2021) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting S.E.C. v. … The court invoked the Ninth 18 Circuit’s guidance in Rhoades v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Berumen v. Jones

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 8, 2023

    See 23 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 23 Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries Service

    723 F. Supp. 2d 1247 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 8, 2010

    Since 2001, the Corps has attempted to mitigate this problem by installing seasonal flash boards that direct additional flows toward the ladders. BiOp at 22. … FCC v. Fox TV.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Jaime

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 10, 2026

    During this time, the 4 toilet in his cell backed up, filling and clogging the bowl with brown feces, urine, and used pieces 5 of tissue. … Dittman, 191 F.3d at 13 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. 14 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of Reclamation

    823 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, E.D. California · May 28, 1993

    Thus, if Westlands’ board members would be entitled to immunity under § 820.2, so is Westlands itself. See Wallace v. City of Los Angeles, 12 Cal.App.4th 1385 , 16 Cal.Rptr.2d 113 (1993). … Allegations that these decisions were unwise, or even an abuse of the Board’s discretion, do not diminish Westlands’ entitlement to discretionary act immunity. Plaintiffs cite to Sandrini Brothers, Inc. v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tortilleria "La Mejor"

    758 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 20, 1991

    In Patel v. … Judicial and Board decisions, notably this court’s [NLRB v.]

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mohey Soliman v. Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 13, 2026

    See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also 25 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Therefore, the Court grants the pending 26 motion for the appointment of counsel. … . § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also 27 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Professor Jacqueline Brown is hereby 28 appointed to represent petitioner for the duration of the proceedings in this Court.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • D'Lil v. Riverboat Delta King, Inc.

    59 F. Supp. 3d 1001 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 25, 2014

    Wilkins-Jones v. … Donald v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Pension Fund v. Measurement Instrumentation and Controls, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 11, 2023

    EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 BOARD … P. 15(a), that such an 6 amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in 7 bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 8 V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cal-Farm Insurance v. United States

    647 F. Supp. 1083 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 5, 1986

    Foster v. … See Bailey v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.