Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

10,000+ results

1.49s

  • James R. Nestor v. Lewis B. Hershey

    425 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1969

    Bowen v. Hershey, 410 F.2d 962 (1st Cir. 1969); Crane v. Hershey, 410 F.2d 966 (1st Cir. 1969); Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 412 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1969); Marsano v. Laird, 412 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1969); Foley v. … This is the manner in which the Second Circuit has chosen to read Local Board Memorandum No. 87. See Marsano v. Laird, 412 F.2d 65, 69 (2d Cir. 1969); Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 297 F.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Keyes v. Madsen

    179 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1950

    Co. v. City of St. Louis, 8 Cir., 1933, 64 F.2d 921, 929 , certiorari denied 1933, 290 U.S. 668 , 54 S.Ct. 88 , 78 L.Ed. 577 ; Southwestern Oil Co. v. … Case v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • CenturyTel of Montana, Inc. v. NLRB

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 13, 2026

    Cir. 2024) (quoting Dickinson v. … (quoting Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB, 440 U.S. 301, 314 (1979)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D&S Consulting, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    961 F.3d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2020

    Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for 4 W. Dist. of Texas, 571 U.S. 49, 60 (2013). … See Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd., 494 F.3d 378, 386 (2d Cir. 2007).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Biscuit Division v. Leedom

    265 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1959

    v. … requirements or from those of due process * * 4 for which we granted relief in Leedom v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Hammerer v. Huff

    110 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 1939

    We therefore assume in the appellant’s favor a correction, permissible under Downey v. United States, 1937, 67 App.D. … The appellee rests his contention upon Zerbst v. Kidwell, 1938, 304 U.S. 359 , 58 S.Ct. 872 , 82 L.Ed. 1399 , 116 A.L.R. 808 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Esper

    322 F. Supp. 3d 88 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2018

    See, e.g. , Saint-Fleur v. McHugh , 83 F.Supp.3d 149 , 157 (D.D.C. 2015). … See Pierce v. SEC , 786 F.3d 1027 , 1034 (D.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Despina Spirides v. John E. Reinhardt, Director of United States International Communication Agency

    613 F.2d 826 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1979

    A second appeal to the Appeals Review Board confirmed USICA’s decision. … See also Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 826-28 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). 10 . Pub.L.No.92-261, § 717, 86 Stat. 211 , 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (Supp. II 1972).

    Cited 259 timesPublished
  • Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. Clark

    177 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 11, 1949

    They have neither the necessary • authority nor the necessary qualifications for such work.” 143 F.2d at page 151 , citing Standard Computing Scale Company v. Farrell, supra. See also National War Labor Board v. … Marbury v. Madison; Keim v. United States; Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, supra.

    Reversed on other grounds by Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Britton

    269 F.2d 249 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 16, 1959

    In O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Max-on, 1951, 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 , the Supreme Court said: “ * * * The standard, therefore, is that discussed in Universal Camera Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. Barry

    387 F.2d 860 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 1967

    United States v. Alaska S. S. Co., 253 U.S. 113, 115-116 [ 40 S.Ct. 448 , 64 L.Ed. 808 ], and cases cited; United States v. … Pierre v. United States, 319 U.S. 41 , 63 S.Ct. 910 , 87 L.Ed. 1199 (1943).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cookeville Regional Medical Center v. Leavitt

    531 F.3d 844 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2008

    Each hospital appealed to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, and lost. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a). … Affirmed. 7 See Brown v. Thompson, 374 F.3d 253, 257-60 (4th Cir. 2004); Pimba Cortes v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 177 F.3d 1272, 1283-84 (11th Cir. 1999); Beverly Comm. Hosp. Ass’n v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Reilly v. Millis

    144 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1944

    See also Switchmen's Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 1943, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 ; Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. … United Transport Service Employees of America, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 137 F.2d 817 ; Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, No. 8680, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 143 F.2d 145 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • S. S. W., Inc. v. Air Transport Ass'n of America

    191 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1951

    Nor does the fact that Board approval of the agreements and understandings charged in the complaint has not yet been obtained alter our conclusion. As the Supreme Court said in U. S. Navigation Co. v. Cunard S. S. … See Terminal Warehouse v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 1936, 297 U.S. 560 , 513-514, 56 S.Ct. 546 , 80 L.Ed. 827 . . Keogh v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 1922, 260 U.S. 156, 162 , 43 S.Ct. 47 , 67 L.Ed. 183 . . Georgia v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. International Fur & Leather Workers Union

    221 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 1955

    status under § 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act. 1 *This appeal followed the District Court’s grant of a preliminary injunction on the authority of our decision in Farmer v. … This conviction is now pending on appeal in t lis court (Gold v. United States, No. 12,332). . Nor does the Act empower the Board to reject Gold’s 1954 affidavit on the ground that his 1950 affidavit was false.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Johnston

    534 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1976

    See Cooper v. Lockhart, 489 F.2d 308, 314-15 (8th Cir. 1973); Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270, 272 (D.D.C.1973). See also, Lawrence v. … Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 (1965). . Tippitt v. Wood, supra, 140 F.2d at 692 ; Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, supra, 345 F.2d at 739 . .

    Vacated on other grounds by Reed v. Byrd, 429 U.S. 995 (1976)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Croker v. Helvering

    91 F.2d 299 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1937

    See Phipps v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 54 F.(2d) 469 , and Pope v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 77 F.(2d) 599 . We, therefore, approve the ruling of the Board in this- respect. Third. … On appeal, the Board found that there was no proof of an embezzlement.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Teamsters, Chauffeurs And Helpers Local Union No. 79, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

    325 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1963

    the V-C picket line, but solely to continue their business dealings with V-C. … to support the findings of the Board and it follows accordingly, that the petition to set aside the order and supplemental order of the Board must be denied.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Series "A" Trust v. Helvering

    126 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 9, 1942

    This is a petition to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals involving petitioner’s income and excess profits tax for the years 1933 and 1934. The case was submitted with No. 7865 (Second Carey Trust v. … The ruling of the Board in this respect is consistent with its long established practice. Blundon v. Commissioner, 32 B.T.A. 285, 288, 289 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.