Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.55s
Louie C. Wingo v. Walter E. Washington
395 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1968
In the light of Blohm v. Tobriner, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 2 , 350 F.2d 785 (1965), the record and the findings of the appellees must be closely scrutinized. … Monica v. Tobriner, 253 F.Supp. 851, 852-853 (D.D.C.1966).
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States v. Michael H. Hinkle
492 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1974
Called as a witness for the appellant at trial he tes *662 tified that one Michael Brown was the other robber with him, and he said he had given Brown’s name to Detective DeSoto on the night of the robbery. … In rebuttal Detective DeSoto testified that Johnson had told him Hinkle — not Brown — was the other robber.
Cited 4 timesPublished523 F.2d 1099 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 28, 1975
523 F.2d 1099 173 U.S.App.D.C. 150 UNITED STATES of America v. James BRIDGEMAN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Henry B. JOHNSON, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. William BROWN, Appellant. … Sentencing Transcript, William Brown, 23-24.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKarl F. Ritz v. J. J. O'DOnnell
566 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1977
Tincher v. Piasecki, 520 F.2d 851, 854 (7th Cir. 1975). … Tincher v. Piasecki, supra; Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 314 F.2d 886, 912 (4th Cir.), cert. den., 372 U.S. 976 , 83 S.Ct. 1111 , 10 L.Ed.2d 142 (1963).
Cited 39 timesPublishedBernard Feinberg v. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
522 F.2d 1335 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 1975
See, e. g., United States v. Brown, 484 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974); United States v. … Board of Educ., 456 F.2d 399 , 403 n.2 (8th Cir. 1972) (discharge of public school teacher); Caulder v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedFrank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of State
617 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1979
The Board’s regulations were effective on April 1, 1976, and appellant filed his grievance on August 27 of that year. . Our ruling follows the decision of this court in Oppenheim v. … See Wallace v. Lynn, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 363, 367 , 507 F.2d 1186, 1190 (1974).
Cited 931 timesPublishedKutcher v. Gray, Adm'r of Veterans' Affairs
199 F.2d 783 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 16, 1952
United States v. Wickersham, 1906, 201 U.S. 390 , 26 S.Ct. 469 , 50 L.Ed. 798 ; Deak v. Pace, 1950, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 50 , 185 F.2d 997 ; Borak v. … In Bailey v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWashington Hospital Center v. Butler
384 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1967
Rodgers v. Lawson, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 282 , 170 F.2d 157, 158 (1948). See also Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 118, 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963); Quick v. … See also Grubb v. Groover, 62 App.D.C. 305 , 67 F.2d 511 (1933), cert. denied 291 U.S. 660 , 54 S.Ct. 377 , 78 L.Ed. 1052 (1934). . See Brown v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedFreedman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
255 F.3d 840 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 2001
See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). It is undoubted that Freedman is a member of a protected class. … See Freedman v. MCI, No. 98-2753, slip op. at 15 (D.D.C. Aug. 24, 2000). We think that this may read our decision in Brown too broadly.
Cited 212 timesPublished73 F.2d 110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1934
This is the rule of practice in the Board of Tax Appeals. Crider Brothers v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 338, 350; Schilling Grain Co. v. Commissioner, 8 B. T. A. 1048, 1057; Evangeline Gravel Co. v. Commissioner, 13 B. … See Heiner v. Tindle, supra; Goldsborough v. Burnet, 46 F.(2d) 432 (C. C. A. 4th); Dresser v. U. S., 55 F.(2d) 499 (Ct.Cl.). The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed. GRONER, Associate Justice.
Cited 15 timesPublished83 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1936
The following authorities by analogy sustain this view: Dakin v. Bayly, 290 U.S. 143, 146 , 54 S.Ct. 113 , 78 L.Ed. 229 , 90 A.L.R. 999 ; Hanover Nat. Bank v. … Suddath, 215 U.S. 110 , 30 S.Ct. 58 , 54 L.Ed. 115 ; Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U.S. 502 , 25 S.Ct. 339 , 49 L.Ed. 571 . Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished322 F. Supp. 3d 88 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2018
See, e.g. , Saint-Fleur v. McHugh , 83 F.Supp.3d 149 , 157 (D.D.C. 2015). … See Pierce v. SEC , 786 F.3d 1027 , 1034 (D.C.
Cited 10 timesPublishedLeonard P. Matlovich v. Secretary of the Air Force and Colonel Alton J. Thogersen
591 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1978
See Carey v. … See also Sanger v.
Cited 74 timesPublishedRocky Mountain Health Maint. Org., Inc. v. Azar
384 F. Supp. 3d 80 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 2019
Inst. v. I.C.C. , 587 F.2d 1285 , 1290 (D.C. Cir. 1978). … Inst., Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2025
Hawker v. People of New York, 170 U.S. 189, 191 (1898); see NASA v. … That is because such facial challenges invalidate laws across the board no matter to whom they are applied. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442, 449 (2008).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJamari Salleh v. Warren Christopher, Secretary of State
85 F.3d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1996
See, e.g., Rapaport v. U.S. Dept. of Treasury, 59 F.3d 212, 216-17 (D.C.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 775 , 133 L.Ed.2d 727 (1996); Benavides v. U.S. … See Costello v. Agency for Int'l Dev., 843 F.2d 540, 543 (D.C.Cir.1988); Miller v. Baker, 969 F.2d *694 1098, 1102 (D.C.Cir.1992).
Cited 20 timesPublished336 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1964
336 F.2d 939 119 U.S.App.D.C. 20 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR the DISTRICT OF COLLUMBIA et al., Appellees. Carl L. SHIPLEY et al., Appellants, v. … They disagreed over the authority of the Board of Elections to impose by regulation a requirement that proof of the acquiescence of each named individual be supplied.
Cited 0 timesPublished288 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 1961
288 F.2d 132 109 U.S.App.D.C. 348 BORDAS & COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … UNION DE TRABAJADORES DE MUELLES Y RAMAS ANEXAS DE PUERTO RICO, LOCAL 1900, IBL-AFL-CIO, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 15524, 15589.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalter J. Thomas v. James Baker, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State
925 F.2d 1523 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 1991
See Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 , 96 S.Ct. 2868, 2877 , 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976). Mr. Thomas’s other objections are not well-taken. … United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 , 61 S.Ct. 999, 1004 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 (1941) (“Morgan IV”).
Cited 6 timesPublishedKyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission
609 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 26, 1979
Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). … Davis v. Jimmy Carter, et al.; No. 79-1764, James W. Judkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board.
Cited 17 timesPublished
Ask Donna