Case law

Frank Palacios v. Richard Spencer

906 F.3d 124 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 2018

RICHARD V. … The Naval Discharge Review Board denied both of his requests. Palacios then asked the Board for Correction of Naval Records to correct his records. The Correction Board denied his request in 2010.

United States v. Rita M. Lavelle

751 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1985

See United States v. … See United States v.

Hosp. of Barstow, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

897 F.3d 280 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2018

We remanded the case to enable the Board to consider that question. Hosp. of Barstow, Inc. v. NLRB, 820 F.3d 440 (D.C. Cir. 2016). … See, e.g., Carducci v. Regan, 714 F.2d 171, 177 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Leonard Davis v. Theodor Schuchat

510 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1975

University of Southern California, and the chairmanship of the board of the Fund for the City College of New York. … Brown, 268 F.Supp. 198 (D.D.C.1967) (Holtzoff, J.), but a trial court sitting without a jury has the widest discretion in fixing an amount. United Securities Corp. v. Franklin, 180 A.2d 505 (D.C.Mun.App.1962).

Holmes v. United States

11 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1926

Keady v. People, 74 P. 892 , 32 Colo. 62 , 66 L. R. A. 353; Wright v. State, 18 Ga. 383, 391 ; Boyd v. State, 17 Ga. 194 ; Dilger v. Com., 11 S. W. 651 , 88 Ky. 550, 559 ; Lyons v. State, 9 Tex. App. 636; Alsop v. … Nor can we find any error in permitting the district attorney to examine the witness Pomeroy Brown as a hostile witness. The right to permit this was within the sound discretion of the court. St. Clair v. H. S., 14 S.

Garfield v. United States ex rel. Turner

31 App. D.C. 332 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1908

Wood v. Board of Assessors, 137 N. Y. 201 , 33 N. E. 145 ; People ex rel. Durant Land & Improv. Co. v. Jeroloman, 139 N. Y. 14 , 34 N. E. 726 ; Com. ex rel. Vandyke v. Henry, 49 Pa. 530 ; State ex rel. McBride v. … McClellan v. Graves, 19 Md. 351 , 81 Am. Dec. 639 .

First Student, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

935 F.3d 604 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 3, 2019

Leasing Co. v. NLRB, 831 F.3d 534, 546 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (citing NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 743 (1962)). The “perfectly clear” successor doctrine has its origins in the Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. … e.g., Carpenters & Millwrights, Local Union 2471 v.

Pacific Maritime Association v. NLRB

967 F.3d 878 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2020

. v. … Stern v.

Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair

23 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1928

This court will take judicial notice of the Board’s rules when regularly promulgated. Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 55 App. D. … See Weaver v. Blair, Commissioner (C. C. A.) 19 F.(2d) 16 , and Reliance Mfg. Co. v. Blair, Commissioner (C. C.

Troutbrook Company LLC v. NLRB

107 F.4th 994 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2024

Ass’n v. NLRB, 967 F.3d 878, 893 (D.C. … Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v.

Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

929 F.3d 729 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 2019

The Board merely assumed arguendo the doctrine applies. Having rejected the Board’s analysis of the New Hampshire v. … If the Board determines that judicial estoppel is available in appropriate circumstances, then under New Hampshire v.

In re Navy Chaplaincy

323 F. Supp. 3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 30, 2018

Act"); Wallace v. … Claim 3 MSJ at 39; see id. at 37-42 (first citing Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. , 459 U.S. 116 , 103 S.Ct. 505 , 74 L.Ed.2d 297 (1982) ; and then citing Board of Education v.

Thomas McLamb v. NLRB

141 F.4th 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2025

Standard of Review “Judicial review of the Board’s decisions and orders must evaluate both the Board’s statements of law and application of law to the facts.” Circus Circus Casinos v. NLRB, 961 F.3d 469, 475 (D.C. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951) (quotation omitted). We give “substantial deference to inferences drawn by the Board from the factual record.” Tenneco Auto., Inc. v.

Sunshine Book Company and Solair Union Naturisme, Inc. v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United States

249 F.2d 114 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 3, 1957

See Kingsley Books, Inc., v. Brown, supra. It may be that the postal power would provide a basis for a Federal statute authorizing a similar form of judicial control. … Board of Regents of University of State of New York, 1953, 305 N.Y. 336, 350 , 113 N.E.2d 502, 512 , reversed sub nom. Superior Films v. Dept. of Education, 1954, 346 U.S. 587 , 74 S.Ct. 286 , 98 L.Ed. 329 . .

Simmons, Sebastian C v. Howard Univ

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1998

Brown argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Anita Barondes argued the cause for appellees. With her on the brief were Michael F. Kleine and Mose Lewis, III. … to represent them); Gustafson v.

Oglala Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n

896 F.3d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 2018

Ctr. v. Sebelius, 566 F.3d 193, 199 (D.C. … Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. at 87-88; see NLRB v.

National Religious Broadcasters Noncommercial Music License Committee v. CRB

77 F.4th 949 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 2023

See SoundExchange, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board, 904 F.3d 41, 46 (D.C. Cir. 2018). … See, e.g., Web V, 86 Fed. Reg. at 59,522–59,546 (Evaluation of Game Theoretic Modelling Evidence); Johnson v. Copyright Royalty Board, 969 F.3d 363, 372 (D.C.

Local 130, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. Frank W. McCulloch Howard Jenkins, Boyd Leedom

345 F.2d 90 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1965

In declining to sanction district court jurisdiction a third time, Boire v. … See, in this connection, NLRB v. Local 182, Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, etc., 314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963). 6 . Milk & Ice Cream Drivers, etc. v. McCulloch, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 306 F.2d 763 (1962); Leedom v.

Windsor Redding Care Center, LLC v. NLRB

944 F.3d 294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 2019

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … Just as the board may not “totally ignore[] facts in the record,” Fred Meyer Stores, 865 F.3d at 638, the Board is obligated to give “attentive consideration” to the ALJ’s decision, Greater Boston Television Corp. v.

Harry Joseph Pollack and Arthur Morton Pollack v. Joy R. Simonson

350 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1965

Compare Melody Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm., 120 U.S.App.D.C. -, 345 F.2d 730 , decided April 8, 1965; Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1964); Yick Wo v. … See Hornsby v. Allen, supra, note 4 .