Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
1.75s
Christopher Henry Lister Sr. v. Sandra Gatt
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2021
White v. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 1990). For prudential 11 reasons, however, federal courts require Section 2241 petitioners to exhaust their administrative 12 remedies prior to seeking habeas relief.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFernande Lyons v. Cucmber Holdings, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 3, 2021
See City of Oakland v. … Lehmann v. Brown, 230 F.3d 916, 919–20 (7th Cir. 2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHerbert O Allen v. Allex Villanueva
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 18, 2023
White v. … Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEric Jerome Phillips, Jr. v. County of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 2020
See Brown v. Trejo, 818 F. App’x. 599, 602 (9th Cir. 24 2020) (construing Nordstrom, 856 F.3d at 1271). 25 Under Heck v. … See Brown, 818 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown33 F. Supp. 2d 1244 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 25, 1999
County of Sonoma v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 222 Cal.App.3d 1133 , 272 Cal.Rptr. 297, 298 (Cal.Ct.App.1990). … See Eisen v.
Reversed on other grounds by Hawkins v. Comparet-Cassani, 251 F.3d 1230 (2001)Cited 20 timesPublishedCarpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation v. Construction Technology Specialists, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2019
Background Plaintiffs Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation (“CSAC”) and Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts (together, “ … See Geddes v. United Fin. Corp., 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Alan Neuman Prods., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPacira BioSciences, Inc. v. Ventis Pharma, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 23, 2024
Paycom Software, Inc. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am., 2022 WL 1063845, at *2 (D. Del. Apr. 8, 2022) (quoting Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp., 431 F.2d 22, 25 (3d Cir. 1970)). … Ventis contends that in addition to passing FDA inspections, the Nubratori facility must pass California Board of Pharmacy inspections. (/d.).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMichaels v. Internet Entertainment Group, Inc.
5 F. Supp. 2d 823 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 1998
Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 482 , 109 S.Ct. 3028, 3036 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989). … See Virgil, 527 F.2d at 1131 ; Briscoe v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedTroy R. Stroud v. United States
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 2023
Browning v. Baker, 875 F.3d 444, 471 (9th Cir. 2017). … Petitioner relies on Garza v. Idaho, 139 S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownY.A.R., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, KAREN HERNANDEZ v.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2026
DEFINITIONS 10 4.1 Action: Y.A.R., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem KAREN 11 HERNANDEZ v. … See Kamakana v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJames Harasch v. Martin O'Malley
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 2025
Brown-Hunter v. … Ford v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLori M. Sprague v. Andrew Saul
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 28, 2022
Holohan v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 25 748150, at *3 n.6 (C.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Jul 22, 2021
Reddick v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVeronica Paz Aguilar v. Catherine L. Jacobs
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 23, 2025
§ 233 as “enormously complicated” and “hardly a model of clarity,” Blumberger v. … “Upon approval, the entity—along with its officers, board members, and employees—are deemed PHS employees for one calendar year.” Blumberger, 115 F.4th at 1118 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 233(g)(1)(A)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2026
See 25 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Phillips 26 v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); Makar-Welbon v. … See Pintos 5 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMartino Recchia v. City of Los Angeles Department of Animal Services
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 2022
Texas v. … Logan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFrankie Mary Ann Phillips v. Andrew Saul
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 3, 2020
Richardson v. … He could also 1] have continued the hearing to augment the record”) (citations omitted); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChristopher E. Batres v. Warden
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 25, 2020
Barren v. … Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989) (“We 27 hold that neither a State nor its officials acting in their official capacities are ‘persons’ under 28 § 1983.”); Brown v. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLao v. Wickes Furniture Co., Inc.
455 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2006
Albino v. Standard Ins. Co., 349 F.Supp.2d 1334, 1338 (C.D.Cal.2004); see also Arellano v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 245 F.Supp.2d 1102, 1107 (S.D.Cal.2003); Ho v. … The Court has some general concerns with using this per capita approach across-the-board to all the Industrial Tectonics factors in every case.
Cited 8 timesPublishedFred G. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2022
In Waeltz v. … Fitzgerald v. Vogel, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna