Case law

Siobahn Carroll v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins).

Linda Kelemer v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 23 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 24 making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins).

Aaron Raiser v. City of Temecula

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 30, 2020

Co., 362 F.2d 339, 342 12 (9th Cir. 1966)). 13 Qualified immunity “applies only to liability for money damages—not 14 injunctive or declaratory relief.” … Mar. 18, 2011) (“[a]lthough the Court finds that Defendants are entitled to 21 qualified immunity, their immunity from damages does not bar Plaintiff’s claims for 22 declaratory relief.”).

Estate of Michael Vasquez v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9

Bible Club Ex Rel. R.G. v. Placentia-Yorba Linda School District

573 F. Supp. 2d 1291 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2008

The District’s argument is misplaced; issuing an injunction would not result in the establishment of a limited open forum at EHS. … EHS has already likely established such a forum already by admitting the Red Cross Club among others.

Juan J. Chavez v. Huhtamaki, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 15, 2019

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 28 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 10 || page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Montano v. Bonnie Brae Convalescent Hospital, Inc.

79 F. Supp. 3d 1120 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 7, 2015

“[T]he history of the FHAA[ 4 ] clearly establishes that Congress anticipated that landlords would have to shoulder certain costs involved, so long as they are not unduly burdensome.” California Mobile Home Park Mgmt. … [ ] ... or other social service establishment”); Hubbard v.

Estate of Mario Solis v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 15 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 16 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 17

Anne Valadez v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 6, 2021

If only a portion or portions of 11 the material on a page qualify for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 12 identify the protected portion(s) (for example, by making appropriate markings in 13 the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 7 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 8 without prior privilege review.

Ryan Odom v. ECA Marketing, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 21, 2020

does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, 4 establishing … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 14 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15

John Forrest v. Thahesha Jusino

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2021

The Eighth Circuit determined that the 27 complaint “clearly charged a generic burglary offense” and that the evidence was sufficient to permit the district court to find that the judgment was in fact a 28 conviction … An intervening court decision must “effect a 27 material change in the applicable law” to establish unavailability.

Cardenas v. McLane Foodservices, Inc.

796 F. Supp. 2d 1246 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2011

The Court found that the wage laws in California qualified as state laws that had “no more than an indirect, remote, and tenuous effect on motor carriers” and, as such, were not preempted by the FAAAA. Id. … For example, MFI does not clearly establish from where it draws its baseline numbers. See Plaintiffs’ Opp’n to DMSJ, 14-15.

Abelina Perez v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 3 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Sarkhan Nabiyev v. Closet World, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2023

The UCL and FAL require a plaintiff to “(1) establish a loss 18 or deprivation of money or property sufficient to qualify as an injury in fact, i.e., 19 economic injury, and (2) show that economic injury was the result … requirements to establish Article III and 16 California statutory standing.

United States v. Filomeno Hernandez

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2020

If only a 15 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 16 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 17 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 1 (b) for testimony given in depositions, that the

Brasserie De Tahiti v. Oceandless Design, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2023

If only a portion or 2266 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 2277 2288 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 1111 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 1122 appropriate markings in the margins

Omar Reynoso v. J. Anaya

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 7, 2025

is required to 5 || dismiss the case at any time it concludes the action is frivolous or malicious, fails 6 || to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a 7 || defendant who is immune … P. 8(d)(1)); (e) set forth clearly the sequence of events giving rise to the claim(s) for relief; (f) allege specifically what 25 each Defendant did and how that individual’s conduct specifically violated Plaintiff’s

The Alixir Company v. Que Onda Beverage, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 12, 2021

If only a portion or portions 6 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 7 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 8 margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 8 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 9 without prior privilege review.

Alkam Home Fashion, Inc. v. Legacy Decor

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 12 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 7 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 8 production without prior privilege review.

Pacific Western Bank v. AIG Specialty Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2022

If only a 21 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 22 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 23 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 5 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 6 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the