Case law

Galen v. Mobil Oil Corp.

922 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 1996

It depicted the sump. 3 Subsequently, in a telephone conversation, Levinson asked Brown to tell him about the property. Brown did not disclose the existence of the buried sump. Brown Depo. at 47:17-48:9. … Power Co. v. Westinghouse Elec.

Masotti v. Tustin Unified School District

806 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 9, 1992

Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. 2 v. Mitchell, 940 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir.1991); See also Shelley C. v. … (No. 1) v. Burlingame Elementary School Dist., 886 F.2d 1558 -1559 (9th Cir.1989), supplemented at 897 F.2d 974 (9th Cir.1989); McSomebodies et al. (No. 2) v.

Yoonessi v. Albany Medical Center

352 F. Supp. 2d 1096 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 10, 2005

Balistr-eri v. … Mir, M.D. v.

Joe Lewis Valentine v. The Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 3, 2025

See Brown v. Or. Dep’t of Corr., 751 F.3d 983, 988-89 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming that claims against state department of corrections is barred by Eleventh Amendment); Del Campo v. … Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 750 (9th Cir. 2009). D.

Fair Housing Council of Orange County, Inc. v. Ayres

855 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 1994

See Resident Advisory Board v. … United States v. Weiss, 847 F.Supp. 819 (D.Nev.1994) following Brown v.

Top Rank, Inc. v. Ortiz (In Re Ortiz)

400 B.R. 755 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2009

See Ervco, Inc. v. … See Jones v.

Alexander v. Thompson

313 F. Supp. 1389 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 1970

The Fourteenth Amendment, as now applied to the States, protects the citizen against the State itself and all of its creatures — Boards of Education not excepted. West Virginia State Board of Education v. … Board of Trustees, 157 Cal.App.2d 811 , 321 P.2d 825 (1958); Grigsby v. King, 202 Cal. 299 , 260 P. 789 (1927); Pasadena School Dist. v. Pasadena, 166 Cal. 7 , 134 P. 985 (1913).

Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick

646 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 24, 1986

NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 913 , 102 S.Ct. 3409, 3425 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1215 (1982) (quoting Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 467 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2293 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980)). … Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 683 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

People of California v. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

475 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 20, 1979

Tucker v. … In Johnson v.

Hairston v. Pitchess

323 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 18, 1971

People v. Hairston, 8 Cal.App.3d Supp. 19 ; 87 Cal.Rptr. 470 . 2. The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, denied a hearing. Crim. 18197 People v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 456 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244 (c), 2254(d). This court is neither bound nor compelled by the prior determinations.

In Re BIDZ.COM, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

773 F. Supp. 2d 844 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2011

See Brehm v. … See Beam v.

In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation

101 F.R.D. 34 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 1984

In contrast to the Zenith view of the common law is the recent decision in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … In Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir.1983), the opinion noted: ...

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International, Inc.

562 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 1983

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum v. … Appearances were: for Plaintiff, Brown & Bain of Phoenix, Arizona, by Jack E. Brown, Esq., and Lois W. Abraham, Esq.; for Defendant, Thomas E. Schatzel, Esq., of Santa Clara, California, by Bruce G.

Gordon v. Sznewajs

357 F. Supp. 3d 1009 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 13, 2018

See Oliveira v. … Gomes v. Am.

Jane Doe v. Venus Concept USA Inc.; Joseph Brown; and Doe 1 to 10 inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 23, 2026

See 4 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), 5 Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar- 6 Welbon v. … DEFINITIONS 3 4.1 Action: This pending federal lawsuit, Jane Doe v.

Colony First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

643 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 1986

The Federal Home Loan Bank Act does not provide consent to suits against the Bank Board. Fahey v. O’Melveny & Myers, 200 F.2d 420, 454 (9th Cir.1952). … Blackmar v. Guerre, supra. The FSLIC and the Bank Board are federal agencies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) and are entitled to the protections of the FTCA. See Federal Savings and Loan Ins. Corp. v.

Associated Gen. Contr., Cal. v. Secretary of Com., US

441 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 1977

I [ Brown v. … Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, supra, 402 U.S. at 22-23, 91 S.Ct. at 1279 .

Snyder v. Altman

444 F. Supp. 1269 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 1978

See McRedmond v. … Guardianship of Kemp, 43 Cal.App.3d 758 , 118 Cal.Rptr. 64 (1974); Browne v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.2d 593 , 107 P.2d 1 (1940).

Arami Cheyenne Walker v. Board of Regents, University of California

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 13, 2022

Prods., Inc. v. Agric. … See Hart v.

Robert John Garcia v. The BPH Board of Parole Hearings

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2020

Pearson v. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000) (citation 25 omitted); see also Sassounian v. Roe, 230 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir. 2000).