Case law

Ron Ramirez v. Sierra Aluminum Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 10, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 10 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 20 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly 21 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 22 margins

Raquel Martin v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section 26 B(2)(b) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery 27 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

Arconic, Inc. v. APC Investment Co.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 16, 2022

If only a 12 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 13 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 16 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 17 production without prior privilege review.

Andres Catalan v. Koki Holdings America, Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Michael Ho v. Marathon Patent Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the 19 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 21 margins … If only a 5 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 6 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 7 markings in the margins).

Curtis Kulig v. The Aldo Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 2019

If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins … If only a 2 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins).

Manuel Vigueras v. Red Robin International, Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2019

Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent 6 evidence by declaration, establishing … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s)

Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. v. Pixels.com, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2021

See UMG Recordings, 718 F.3d at 1030.4 10 11 While the DMCA’s safe harbor does not completely immunize qualified 12 service providers from lability, it does “protect eligible service providers from all 13 … Because Pixels qualifies for safe 15 || harbor under § 512(c), the only relief available to MVPT is the limited injunctive 16 relief pursuant to § 512().

Nicoline Ambe v. Air France, SA

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2021

Counsel have an obligation to lay out their 10] support clearly. Carmen v. San Francisco Sch. Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2001). … external to the passenger, sufficient to qualify as an 12 “accident.”

William Salpaka v. Ohio Security Insurance

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28 in the margins).

Kikishia Burrus v. Elevance Health, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 2023

also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 4 making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended 23 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 24

Olive Hill Street Partners, LLC v. SPC Owner LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 14, 2021

If only a 14 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 15 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 16 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Happy Ashley Ltd. v. All Access Apparel, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2021

If only a portion or portions of 22 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Estate of Paul Rea v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 2020

If only a 15 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 16 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 17 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 28 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles

676 F. Supp. 1515 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 1987

The Supreme Court however clearly ruled in Blum and Delaware Valley that a fee enhancement cannot be awarded solely on the basis of those considerations. … It would also contradict long-established rules of professional conduct for lawyers which have approved the payment of premiums for compensation of risk.

Lucio Lemus v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 11, 2022

If only a 21 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 22 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 23 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 6 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

United States of America v. Nationwide Medical, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 20, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 13 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 8 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege 9 review.

Alliance of Schools for Cooperative Insurance Programs v. Vornado Air LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the 12 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 13 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … privilege or other protection, the obligations of 27 the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). 28 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established

Hector Barba Sr. v. City of Huntington Park

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 23 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 6 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 7 appropriate markings in the margins

Vincent Turrey v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 19, 2023

If only a 14 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 15 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 16 | markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 26 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 |lidentify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 28 ||