Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,916 results
2.03s
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. United States Department of Agriculture
223 F. Supp. 3d 1008 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 2016
“The party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing these elements.” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 . 1. … “[A]n agency must have discretion to rely on the reasonable opinions of its own qualified experts even if, as an original matter, a court might find contrary views more persuasive.” Marsh v. Oregon Nat. Res.
Cited 4 timesPublishedKevin Walker v. AT and T Benefit Plan No. 3
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2021
this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is 16 disclosed or produced. … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).\ 28
Cited 0 timesUnknownThe Breakfast Klub, Inc. v. 1600 Breakfast Club, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2023
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 18 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 19 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 2 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 3 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknown601 F. Supp. 1421 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 1985
The length of the statute is clearly determined on a different basis: the amount of time within which it is reasonable to expect plaintiffs to present their claims; the concern for protecting against the loss of evidence; … Supreme Court held that “the limitation goes to the right created and accompanies the obligation everywhere ... if the limitation ... was directed to the newly created liability so specifically as to warrant saying that it qualified
Cited 24 timesPublishedJonathan Jerozal v. Stryker Corporation
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2023
If only a 27 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 28 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 11 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 12 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownRobert Burchfield v. Prestige Consumer HealthCare, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2021
The parties’ mere 20 designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— 21 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 22 material sought to be filed under … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLuke Davis v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2020
If 2 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the
Cited 0 timesUnknown385 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 1974
Sumida is a highly-qualified engineer with a number of patents in various technical fields. … call the ’494 patent to its attention, by (b) misrepresenting that he had balanced the weight of the piston against the weight of the shoe to eliminate vibration and by (c) representing that he was the inventor when he clearly
Cited 1 timesPublishedCharay Morris v. M and C Hotel Interests, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 3, 2021
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 8 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in … If only a portion 21 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 22 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate
Cited 0 timesUnknown524 F. Supp. 2d 1204 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 30, 2007
They are appointed to life tenure to establish their independence and to render them as immune as possible within the constitutional structure from political influences and pressures. … The court recognizes that the precise parameters of what is meant by the term "sting” are not well-established.
Vacated in part by United States v. Grant, 312 F. App'x 39 (2009)Cited 4 timesPublishedItasca Images, LLC v. 123RF, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 9, 2022
If only a portion of the 18 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 19 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 21 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without
Cited 0 timesUnknownArlin Sahnazoglu v. Midland Funding, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 18, 2023
If only a portion 11 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 13 … If only a portion or portions of the 2 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 3 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate
Cited 0 timesUnknownRaquel Martin v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2023
Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section 26 B(2)(b) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery 27 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings
Cited 0 timesUnknownJulio Villa v. Sentinel Transportation, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 3, 2023
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBenjamin Montemayor v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2021
If only a 6 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 7 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 8 markings in the margins). … If only a 19 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 20 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 21 markings in the margins
Cited 0 timesUnknownMichael Ho v. Marathon Patent Group, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2021
If only a portion or portions of the 19 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 21 margins … If only a 5 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 6 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 7 markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownRon Ramirez v. Sierra Aluminum Company
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 10, 2020
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 10 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 20 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly 21 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 22 margins
Cited 0 timesUnknownArconic, Inc. v. APC Investment Co.
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 16, 2022
If only a 12 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 13 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 16 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 17 production without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAndres Catalan v. Koki Holdings America, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2022
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins
Cited 0 timesUnknownManuel Vigueras v. Red Robin International, Inc
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2019
Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent 6 evidence by declaration, establishing … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s)
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna