Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

3,916 results

0.64s

  • Nika Hosseinalizadeh Noori v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2020

    If only 9 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 10 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 11 in the margins). … If only a 21 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 22 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 23 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • William Kissas v. Mackenzie Johnson

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … The Designating Party 3 shall have the burden on any Designation Motion of establishing the applicability of 4 its “CONFIDENTIAL” designation.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • David Brashear v. Magnet Media Inc

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2019

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … If 1 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 2 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meer Jan v. Laboratory Corporation of America

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2019

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 4 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 5 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Salvador Venegas v. Stan Sniff

    District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2025

    Considered in context, “imprisoned on a criminal charge” clearly includes those in custody pending trial. Id. … IMMUNITY grounds.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cindy Osuna v. Target Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2023

    If only a 2 11 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate > 13 || markings … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 28 || procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 1 || without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Heerema Marine Contractors v. Santa Fe International Corp.

    582 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 1984

    Plaintiffs have failed to establish their immediate intent to engage in any potentially infringing activity. … Precluding a plaintiff from seeking relief when only a single suit has been filed does not immunize a party who either institutes a suit for improper purposes or threatens to bring a suit against a competitor in an attempt

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Christopher Meza v. Daniel Quidort

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2024

    It is well-established in 12 this circuit, however, that Brady applies even prior to the entry 13 of a guilty plea.3 See, e.g., United States v. … immunity. 1 deliberately withhold exculpatory information as part of an attempt 2 to elicit guilty pleas.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Liaigre, Inc. v. California Furniture Collection, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 2020

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 20 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.. 21 || by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure -24 || may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without priot 25 || privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MSC.Software Corporation v. Heroux Devtek Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 2020

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 20 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … Then, before producing the 28 specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 portion(s) (e.g

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Saharra M. White v. County of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … If only a 8 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 9 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 10

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Joel Stallworth v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 25, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 2 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 3 without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kalee Przybylak v. Bissell Better Life LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2019

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s … must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 10 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. Progressive Power Group Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2019

    Except as otherwise provided 14 in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery 15 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 16 designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 7 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Herman Weissker, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 2019

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 3 … If only a portion of the material on a 12 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 13 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 14 (b)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Santiago Lim v.Transforce, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 8, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 20 (e.g., by making appropriate

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Jun 26, 2020

    If only a 25 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 27 appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 27 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 28 production without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meridian Rapid Defense Group LLC v. Delta Scientific Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 29, 2024

    mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery 18 Material as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE 19 COUNSELS’ EYES ONLY does not—without the submission of competent evidence 20 by declaration, establishing … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 20 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege 21 review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Susan Seyster v. United Services Automobile Association

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2019

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 4 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 5 making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • August Image, LLC v. Line Financial, PBC

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 2024

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 14 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 15 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 16 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.