Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,916 results
0.64s
Nika Hosseinalizadeh Noori v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2020
If only 9 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 10 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 11 in the margins). … If only a 21 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 22 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 23 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownWilliam Kissas v. Mackenzie Johnson
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2021
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … The Designating Party 3 shall have the burden on any Designation Motion of establishing the applicability of 4 its “CONFIDENTIAL” designation.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDavid Brashear v. Magnet Media Inc
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2019
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … If 1 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 2 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion
Cited 0 timesUnknownMeer Jan v. Laboratory Corporation of America
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2019
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 4 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 5 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSalvador Venegas v. Stan Sniff
District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2025
Considered in context, “imprisoned on a criminal charge” clearly includes those in custody pending trial. Id. … IMMUNITY grounds.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCindy Osuna v. Target Corporation
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2023
If only a 2 11 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate > 13 || markings … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 28 || procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 1 || without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHeerema Marine Contractors v. Santa Fe International Corp.
582 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 1984
Plaintiffs have failed to establish their immediate intent to engage in any potentially infringing activity. … Precluding a plaintiff from seeking relief when only a single suit has been filed does not immunize a party who either institutes a suit for improper purposes or threatens to bring a suit against a competitor in an attempt
Cited 6 timesPublishedChristopher Meza v. Daniel Quidort
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2024
It is well-established in 12 this circuit, however, that Brady applies even prior to the entry 13 of a guilty plea.3 See, e.g., United States v. … immunity. 1 deliberately withhold exculpatory information as part of an attempt 2 to elicit guilty pleas.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownLiaigre, Inc. v. California Furniture Collection, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 2020
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 20 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.. 21 || by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure -24 || may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without priot 25 || privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMSC.Software Corporation v. Heroux Devtek Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 2020
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 20 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … Then, before producing the 28 specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 portion(s) (e.g
Cited 0 timesUnknownSaharra M. White v. County of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2019
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … If only a 8 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 9 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 10
Cited 0 timesUnknownJoel Stallworth v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 25, 2021
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 2 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 3 without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKalee Przybylak v. Bissell Better Life LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2019
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s … must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 10 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHomeland Insurance Company of New York v. Progressive Power Group Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2019
Except as otherwise provided 14 in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery 15 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 16 designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 7 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9
Cited 0 timesUnknownTrustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Herman Weissker, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 2019
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 3 … If only a portion of the material on a 12 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 13 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 14 (b)
Cited 0 timesUnknownSantiago Lim v.Transforce, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 8, 2021
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 20 (e.g., by making appropriate
Cited 0 timesUnknownWilliam Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 26, 2020
If only a 25 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 27 appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 27 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 28 production without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMeridian Rapid Defense Group LLC v. Delta Scientific Corporation
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 29, 2024
mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery 18 Material as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE 19 COUNSELS’ EYES ONLY does not—without the submission of competent evidence 20 by declaration, establishing … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 20 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege 21 review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSusan Seyster v. United Services Automobile Association
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2019
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 4 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 5 making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAugust Image, LLC v. Line Financial, PBC
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 2024
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 14 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 15 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 16 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna