Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

1.79s

  • Factora v. District Director of the U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    292 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 18, 1968

    That specific question was considered in Bergen Dress Company v. Bouchard, 304 F.2d 145 (3rd Cir., 1962). There, the court quoted Rusk v. … Ng Yip Yee v. Barber, 267 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1959).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Mark Marino

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 28, 2023

    See Kamakana v. City and 15 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors 16 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … DEFINITIONS 5 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit captioned SEC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jane Doe v. John Roe 1

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2025

    Plaintiff alleges that unspecified Defendants and Defendant University of Central Florida Board of Trustees (“BOT”)1 provided information that formed the basis for the articles and that BOT subsequently disseminated the … Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc., 545 U.S. 546, 553 (2005) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267 (1806)). Any doubts about removal are resolved in favor of remand. Gaus v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mark Lund v. Martin O'Malley

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 26, 2022

    Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 12 || F.3d at 492 (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ferguson v. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES

    823 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2011

    See Bischoff v. … Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Celsa Barrera v. Andrew Saul

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 8, 2020

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 7 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bunnell v. … See Fair v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vaporstream Inc v. Snap Inc

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 21, 2019

    Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997) (citing Landis v. N. 12 Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)). … Ssangyong Corp., 708 F.2d 1458, 1465 (9th Cir. 1983) 16 (quoting Leyva v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • International Marble & Granite of Colorado, Inc. v. Congress Financial Corp.

    465 F. Supp. 2d 993 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 2006

    Zenith, 108 F.3d at 207 ; see also Kona Enters. v. … Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1010 (9th Cir.2005).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lamone Lacy v. Martin O'Malley

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2025

    Vocational expert Elizabeth Brown-Ramos also 17 testified. (AR 67-71.) … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th 12 Cir. 2015) (as amended) (citation omitted); Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1115 (9th 13 Cir. 2012), superseded by regulation on other grounds as stated in Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DMF Inc v. AMP Plus Inc

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2024

    ELCO objects to DMF’s proposed judgment because it does not mention 22 the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) determination that Claim 17 of the ’266 23 Patent is invalid. Obj. ¶ 3. … AMP Plus, Inc. v. DMF, Inc., No. 2021-1595, 2022 WL 16844516, 25 at *7 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2022) (“[W]e therefore affirm the Board’s decision finding 26 claim 17 to be unpatentable.”) This decision is binding.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cano v. Davis

    211 F. Supp. 2d 1208 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 2002

    See Bush v. … Davis v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Isaac Torres v. Alex Villanueva

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 19, 2021

    Arevalo v. … Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 3 (9th Cir. 2012) (citation omitted); see also Middlesex Cty. Ethics Comm. v. 4 Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423, 435-37 (1982); Page v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lolene Moody v. Kilolo Kijakazi

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2023

    Brown-Hunter v. … See, e.g., Woods v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arya v. Calpers

    943 F. Supp. 2d 1062 · District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2013

    Here, both CalPERS and Golden Gate have a distinct operational focus and a separate governing board, are solely responsible for hiring and managing their own personnel; and receive their own funding from different sources … Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir.2000); see also Smith v. Pac. Props. & Dev. Corp., 358 F.3d 1097 , 1106 (9th Cir.2004) (citing Doe v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Isaac Torres v. Alex Villanueva

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 23, 2021

    See Holder v. … Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 10 (9th Cir. 2012) (citation omitted); see also Middlesex Cty. Ethics Comm. v. 11 Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423, 435-37 (1982); Page v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Richard Snyder v. Kilolo Kijakazi

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2023

    Brown-Hunter v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Charles Edward Allen v. People of the State of California

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 8, 2020

    See Brown v. Mayle, 5 || 283 F.3d 1019, 1040 (9th Cir. 2002) (Romero claim is not cognizable on federal 6 || habeas review), judgment vacated on other grounds, 538 U.S. 901 (2003). … See McQueary v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Joseph D. Gilberti Jr. v. Center Disease Control CDC

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2021

    CV 20-08251 FMO (PVC) Date: February 4, 2021 Title Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. Center for Disease Control, et al. Present: The Honorable Pedro V. … Hatch v. Reliance Ins. Co., 758 F.2d 409, 414 (9th Cir. 1985).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Warren Davis v. Covello

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 30, 2019

    Gray v. Netherland, 518 U.S. 152, 162-63, 116 S. Ct. 2074, 14 135 L. Ed. 2d 457 (1996); Davis v. Silva, 511 F.3d 1005, 1009 (9th Cir. 2008). … See, e.g., Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zachary Castaneda v. Owner VCI Medical Center

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 21, 2021

    The University of California and the Board of 21 Regents of the University of California are deemed instrumentalities of the state 22 of California for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment. Jackson v. … See Ivey v. Board of 26 Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 27 D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.