Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

2.15s

  • GD Searle & Company v. MDX Purity Pharmacies, Inc.

    275 F. Supp. 524 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 1967

    In National Lead Company v. … In commenting on the effect of the use of a similar name by third parties, the court states at page 1014: “As we have noted, the board found, with abundant support of record, that the term “VOGUE” had become exceedingly well

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Practical Magic, LLC v. Genevieve Von Petzinger

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2025

    Co. v. United Computer Sys., Inc., 98 F.3d 1206, 1209 (9th Cir. 1996). … Forbush v. NTI-CA Inc., 2025 WL 405696, at *15 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2025) (citing Children’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Lee Mitchell v. Engleman

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2021

    Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 499 (1973); see also Ramirez v. … Nelson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Daniil Sheiko v. Thomas Giles

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 2019

    On October 11, 2019, Petitioner moved for preliminary injunctive relief to enjoin the Department of Homeland Security from removing him before the Board of Immigration Appeals adjudicates his Motion to Reopen his immigration … Trucking Ass’ns v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carrol v. Sullivan

    802 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 1992

    In Robertson v. … Sullivan, 784 F.Supp. 253 (E.D.Pa.1992); Thomas for Brown v. Sullivan, 785 F.Supp. 788 (C.D.Ill.1992); Santiago v. Sullivan, 783 F.Supp. 223 (E.D.Pa.1992); Lopez v. Sullivan, 780 F.Supp. 496 (N.D.Ill.1991); Butts v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Irvine Medical Center v. Shalala

    63 F. Supp. 2d 1137 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 1999

    .”); Northern States Power Co. v. … See Shannon v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davidson v. Astrue

    703 F. Supp. 2d 1008 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2008

    Smith, MD, a Board eligible psychiatrist,” who performed a consultative psychiatric evaluation of plaintiff on August 3, 2004. (A.R. 19.) … In Bustamante v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michael Jenkins v. Alex Villanueva

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 13, 2021

    See, e.g., 9 Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir. 1982). Here, there is no indication that petitioner has 10 presented his claim to the California Supreme Court. … See also Hilton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Timur Mishiev v. Katharine McPhee Foster

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2021

    indicates service was performed on Defendant by 27 substituted service on “Christopher Navarro – Mail Room Clerk,” who is described as: 28 “Male Age: 30 Height 5’10” Weight: 170 Race: Hispanic Hair: Black Other: 1 Brown … App. 3d at 2 | 799; see also Espindola v. Nunez, 199 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. v. Fireworks Entertainment Group, Inc.

    156 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 2001

    Mary Rose, by comparison, is fully covered, wearing not only a fully buttoned, long-sleeved, white blouse, but also a brown vest, and brown pants. … Ltd. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Factora v. District Director of the U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    292 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 18, 1968

    That specific question was considered in Bergen Dress Company v. Bouchard, 304 F.2d 145 (3rd Cir., 1962). There, the court quoted Rusk v. … Ng Yip Yee v. Barber, 267 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1959).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dotster, Inc. v. INTERNET CORP. FOR ASSIG. NAMES & NUM.

    296 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 12, 2003

    West Seventh, 812 F.2d 1215 , 1217 (9th Cir.1987) (citing San Diego Committee Against Registration and the Draft v. Governing Board of Grossmont Union High School Dist. 790 F.2d 1471 , 1473 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1986)). … Caplan v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Melody Janelle Castellanos v. Martin O'Malley

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 27, 2025

    Grimm v. … Brown-Hunter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Air Passenger Computer Reservation Systems

    727 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 1989

    In August 1984, the Civil Aeronautics Board ("CAB") established a number of rules governing the practices of CRS vendors. … See, e.g., LaSalvia v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Zhang v. Napolitano

    663 F. Supp. 2d 913 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2009

    But the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) has issued a published decision in Matter of Wang, 25 I. & N. … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983); accord George v. Bay Area Rapid Transit, 577 F.3d 1005, 1010 (9th Cir.2009).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sailer v. Gunn

    387 F. Supp. 1367 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 16, 1974

    In a case fairly analogous to this one, Moore v. … Probation Revocation In Morrissey v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ALEX DADOURIAN v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; ROBERT G. LUNA, in his official capacity as Los Angeles County Sheriff; LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION, AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2026

    Richardson v. … Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 4 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Arroyo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aron Miron v. Dr. Lewis

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2024

    v. … See 21 Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Markeith A. Clinton v. The People

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2025

    App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 486-87 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity 7 Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 416 (1923). … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brooke v. Peterson

    185 F. Supp. 3d 1203 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2016

    See Kreis- *1211 ler v. Second Ave. … In that case, the Middle District of Florida held that the plaintiffs lacked standing when they had never boarded a cruiseship, but had only reviewed a website to determine that the cruiseship had access barriers.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.