Case law

Beard v. Glickman

189 F. Supp. 2d 994 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2001

In 1985, Congress established the CRP, which was designed to encourage owners of highly erodible lands with eligible cropping histories to take those lands out of agricultural production in order to “conserve and improve … It is in the best interest of the public that only that land which qualifies for the CRP actually be included in that program.

Eva Carrillo v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 7 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 8 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 9 in the margins).

Flatiron West, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 8, 2021

If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 11 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material 22 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Thrive Natural Care, Inc. v. Le Vel Brands, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 28, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 16 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 17 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18

Jason Williams v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 2 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 3 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 16 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 17 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making

Jose Garcia v. Cathedral City Police

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 15 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 16 production without prior privilege review.

Syed Rizwan Hashmi v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 6 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 7 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 8 appropriate markings in the margins).

Tacori Enterprises v. S. Kashi and Sons

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 2019

If only a portion of the material on 27 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 2 need … If only a portion 10 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 11 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12 (

Precious Holloway v Aer Lingus Limited et al

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2026

“First, a court may exercise federal-question jurisdiction where a federal right or immunity is ‘an element, and an essential one, of the plaintiff’s cause of action.’ ” Id. (quoting Franchise Tax Bd. v. Constr. … The Convention defines “international carriage” based on the agreed places of departure and destination, and a journey may qualify as international carriage even if it includes domestic segments, so long as the domestic

Jorge Valdes v. Preferred Group Properties, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 8, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26 A Party … If only a portion of the material on 8 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9

Evelyn Jimenez v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 26 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 27 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 9 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 10 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Dexter Hubert White v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 23, 2019

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 22 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 7

In Re Countrywide Financial Corp. Derivative Litigation

542 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 2008

Plaintiffs’ Discovery Requests Are Not Sufficiently “Particularized” to Qualify for Exception from the PSLRA Stay on Discovery. … As established in Section II.A, supra, the Court stays those claims under the Colorado River doctrine. 29 .

D. Gibbs Policy, LLC v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).

Megan Friedlander v. Masava Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in 1 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 2 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 3 produced … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 10 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 11 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Flores v. Johnson

212 F. Supp. 3d 864 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2015

But even assuming the prior reductions in apprehensions were in fact caused by the actions Defendant took in 1989 and 2005 (which itself is not clearly established), those actions, which consisted of expedited review and … “[The] party seeking modification of a consent decree bears the burden of establishing that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the decree.” Id.

Oleksandr Nazarchuk v. Geico General Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 25, 2021

If 13 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 14 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 15 markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 1 (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party

Jackeline Alameida v. City of Long Beach

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 4 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 5 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 6 in the margins).

Christopher White v. Los Angeles County

District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 2022

May 10, 2019) (Plaintiff “alleges generally she 15 has a disability, but fails to plead sufficient facts to establish she is a ‘qualified 16 individual with a disability’ protected under the ADA”). … Plaintiff should clearly identify each defendant being sued and 2 the capacity in which Plaintiff is suing each defendant.

KB Home v. Illinois Union Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 2020

Except as otherwise 18 || provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of 19 || Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be 20 || clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on a page 27 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 28 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).