Case law

Insight Psychology and Addiction, Inc. v. City of Costa Mesa

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in this 4 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 5 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2019

If only a portion of the 4 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 5 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 6 margins). … If only a portion or 18 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 19 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins

Santa Anita Shoppingtown LP v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins).

Total Sweeteners, Inc. v. Christopher Quevedo

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2020

Except as otherwise provided in 8 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 9 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 10 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Daghlian v. Devry University, Inc.

461 F. Supp. 2d 1121 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 2006

STRF is paid into by certain qualified schools based on a formula that accounts for the number of students and the cost of tuition at the institution. … The district court agreed with defendant that the word “section” clearly referred to § 1681m, not § 1681m(h), a “subsection.”

Andrea Humphrey Schmidt v. American Modern Home Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2021

If only a 1 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 2 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 3 in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Brooke Egger v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 25, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a pag 5 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protecte || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedur 10 || may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without pric 11 || privilege review.

Eric Henry Saldivar v. Riverside Police Dept. and Local Riverside Police Agentcies

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 2 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 3 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 14 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 15 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Evelyn Thomas v. Century Villa, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 2021

Minton, 568 U.S. 251, 258 (2013). 13 Federal jurisdiction is only established under Grable if the federal issue meets all four 14 requirements. … Additionally, “[t]he Advisory Opinion is [] unhelpful” 6 because “the PREP Act, a statute affording immunity, is not an essential element of any 7 of Plaintiff's claims.”

Arutyun Dzavayardzhyan v. BMW of North America, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 24, 2023

for protection, the Producing 2 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 3 markings in the margins). 4 A Party … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 without prior privilege review.

Charles Buffin v. Community.Com, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 23, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 2 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 3 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the 13 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 14

Maika Fauteux v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins.) … This provision is not intended to modify 20 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 21 production without prior privilege review.

Mag US Lounge Management LLC v. Ontario International Airport Authority

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 10 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12

Joyce Igasaki v. State Farm General Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 21, 2023

If only a 11 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 12 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 13 in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 23 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 24 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 25 (b)

32nd District Agricultural Association, a California State Institution

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 24 A Party … If only a portion of the material on 6 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 7 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 (b

Marco Rastelli v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 24, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 7 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 8 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 9 markings in the margins

Lasater v. DirecTV, LLC

322 F. Supp. 3d 988 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 2017

DirecTV Is A Qualifying Retail or Service Establishment DirecTV must first show that it is a qualifying "retail or service establishment." 28 U.S.C. § 207 (i). … May 29, 2015), finding DirecTV to be a joint employer, is clearly distinguishable.

Transp. Leasing Co. v. State of Cal.(CalTrans)

861 F. Supp. 931 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 29, 1993

Murtha’s mention of “managing disposal activities” arose in a discussion of a city’s immunity for arrangements for disposal of hazardous substances in its sovereign capacity. … If defendants had provided that service, they clearly would have ‘owned or possessed’ the waste they collected.

Rosa Carrillo Lomeli v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 21, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 1 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for … If only a 10 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 11 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins).

McKettrick v. Yates

627 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2008

established federal law.” … The jury instructions did not create a mandatory presumption, and thus the state court’s decision was not contrary to clearly established federal law. Habeas relief is not warranted on ground one.