Case law

Jeremy James Cotten v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 4, 2020

If only a 27 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 28 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 1 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 12 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 13

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beachcomber Management Crystal Cove, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in this 7 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 8 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 1 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Michelle Finn v. Loandepot.com LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 2023

The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material 1 as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 2 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal … If only a portion or portions of the material 15 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 16

Olakunle Ola v. Galaxe Solutions Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2025

Designations that are show 2 || to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessaril 3 || encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and … Except as otherwise provided in this Order (sec 9 || e.g., section 6.2(b) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery □□□□□□□ 10 || that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly

Susan Gradman v. Debra L. Duggan

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 3 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material 13 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Disney Enters., Inc. v. Vidangel, Inc.

371 F. Supp. 3d 708 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2019

This Court previously found that VidAngel's conduct was not within the scope of FMA protection because "the statute clearly requires that a performance of transmission of filtered content must come from an 'authorized copy … adjudicated on summary judgment: "if, even after resolving all issues in favor of the opposing party, a reasonable trier of fact can reach only one conclusion, a court may conclude as a matter of law whether the challenged use qualifies

Bon Sung Koo v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 12, 2023

If only a portion 19 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins). … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins).

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2019

If only a portion of the 4 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 5 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 6 margins). … If only a portion or 18 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 19 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins

Tagger v. Astrue

536 F. Supp. 2d 1170 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2008

The Commissioner has promulgated regulations establishing a five-step sequential evaluation process for the ALJ to follow in a disability case. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 , 416.920. … Sec. of Health & Human Servs., 729 F.2d 599, 600-01 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam), the prison records, here, clearly demonstrate plaintiff continued to experience auditory hallucinations and other severe problems even while

Natalie Abrishamian v. TotalMed Staffing, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 2, 2019

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 1 (b) for testimony

Douglas G. Gray v. Kristine Ben

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 2022

The Grays’ claims clearly focus on the authorization and approval of two international wire transfers. FAC ¶¶ 30-38. … Wire transfers are clearly traditional banking activities.

ARMLA One, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 2021

If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 24 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins). … If only a portion of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 9 margins).

DC Comics v. Towle

989 F. Supp. 2d 948 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2013

Thus, the license agreement clearly entitles Plaintiff an exclusive right to sell, distribute, and manufacture products derived from the elements that appeared in the Batman television show, including the Bat-mobile. … Only works that “can be iden *969 tified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the [useful] article” qualify for copyright protection. Id.

Eric Henry Saldivar v. Riverside Police Dept. and Local Riverside Police Agentcies

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 2 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 3 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 14 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 15 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Niya Bunch v. Victor Valley Domestic Violence, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 11, 2019

dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune … The Court assumes for purposes of this screening order that Better Way qualifies as a “place of public accommodation.”

Ruthaleen Lopez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 10, 2019

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 1 (b) for testimony

Parker v. Vulcan Material Company Long Term Disability Plan

670 F. Supp. 2d 983 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2009

“[T]he decision on the merits, though, must rest on the administrative record once the conflict (if any) has been established, by extrinsic evidence or otherwise.” Id. … Hartford hired two independent qualified physicians to review Plaintiffs claim, Dr. Lammers and Dr. McQuillen. Dr.

First American Cinema, LLC v. Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 25, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 24 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 25 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 7 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 8 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 9 in the margins).

Yaya Bangoura v. G2 Secure Staff LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 2021

If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 24 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 25 without prior privilege review.

Insight Psychology and Addiction, Inc. v. City of Costa Mesa

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in this 4 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 5 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26