Case law

Hernandez v. Craven

350 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 1972

This is not a ease where a defendant and counsel had become embroiled in such irreconcilable conflict that there was no cooperation or communication as in Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166 (9th Cir. 1970). … Note that in the Brown case the Court said: “Of course, a court is not required to provide an indigent accused with any particular attorney whom he may desire.” Id. at 1170 .

Lopez v. Craven

301 F. Supp. 959 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 21, 1969

The purpose of permitting evidence of prior convictions is to assist the sentencing judge in prescribing the proper term of imprisonment and to assist the parole board in its considerations of the prisoner’s rehabilitative … Justice Harlan’s majority opinion in Spencer v.

Rudolph Ellis v. Superior Court of California

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2021

See, e.g., Rhoades v. … See, e.g., 13 Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir. 1982). Here, there is no indication that petitioner has 14 presented the instant claim to the California Supreme Court.

Global Master International Group, Inc. v. Esmond Natural, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2024

See United States v. … Old Person v. Brown, 312 F.3d 1036, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Richardson v. United States, 841 F.2d 993, 996 (9th Cir. 1988)); see also United States v.

Crystal Monique Richard v. Michelle King

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 1, 2025

Brown 15 v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983); accord Garcia v. 16 Comm’r, 768 F.3d 925, 930 (9th Cir. 2014); see also Sims v. … v.

Robert L. Davis v. David Holbrook

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 2024

See Brown v. California 19 Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding that the CDCR is 20 entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity). Dkt. 17 at 5–6. … Pennhurst v. State Sch. & 9 || Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1984); C.N. v. Wolf, 410 F. Supp. 2d 894, 10 | 900 (C.D.

Dwight Timothy Grandy v. James Carson, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2026

Brown v. Duringer Law Grp. PLC, 86 F.4th 1251, 1254 (9th Cir. 2023) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Bell v. City of Boise, 709 F.3d 890, 897 (9th Cir. 2013).

Pogrebnoy v. Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc.

289 F. Supp. 3d 1061 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 2, 2017

Co. v. … See Cleary v.

Huang v. Autoshade

950 F. Supp. 1016 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 1997

See Texas Instruments v. … The Board upheld the Examiner’s decision rejecting the second, new claim.

Kawanti N. Lisby v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2021

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 488-89. 9 || This requirement is very difficult to satisfy.

Iniestra v. Cliff Warren Investments, Inc.

886 F. Supp. 2d 1161 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 2012

See., e.g., Blomgren v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

United States v. Real Property Located at 6625 Zumirez Drive

845 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 11, 1994

Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 266-67 , 109 S.Ct. 2909, 2915-16 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989). … Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 266-67 , 109 S.Ct. 2909, 2915-16 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989).

Herbalife International of America, Inc. v. Eastern Computer Exchange, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2024

Donald Brown ISO 27 Opp’n EMSJ (“Brown Decl. Opp’n EMSJ”) ¶ 11, Ex. J (“E. Dep.”) 170:15, Ex. 19, 28 ECF No. 134-2.) The February 23, 2021 PO is unsigned and lists the price of every 1 item as “1.00.” (Id.) … (HAMF 49; 4 Brown Decl. Opp’n EMSJ ¶ 17, Ex.

Dallas Blake Johnson v. Warden, USP Victorville

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 9, 2025

See 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b) (“Notwithstanding any 9 other provision of law, a designation of a place of imprisonment under this 10 subsection is not reviewable by any court.”); Brown v. Ives, 543 F. … Id.; see also Laing v.

S. David Sedaghat v. Jerry Roles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

David Sedaghat v. Jerry Roles et al. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009); see Moss v.

Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Yasutomi Warehousing & Distribution, Inc.

326 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2004

See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e); Anchorage Assocs. v. Virgin Islands Board of Tax Review, 922 F.2d 168 , 175 (3rd Cir.1990). … Royal Insurance Co. v. Sea-Land Service Incorporated, 50 F.3d 723, 728 (9th Cir.1995). In Insurance Co. of North America v.

Dina Kourda v. David Salinas

District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 2022

Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal Pursuant to the Court’s Order of May 14, 2020, the parties were required to “file a joint status report advising the court as to the status of the PetConnect and Brown … P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962); Pagtalunan v.

Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City of Los Angeles

844 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 15, 1994

Co. v. … The strongest of these cases is Aerovías Interamericanas De Panama, S.A v. Board of County Comm’rs, 197 F.Supp. 230 (S.D.Fla.1961), rev’d on other grounds, 307 F.2d 802 (5th Cir.1962).

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2020

Dkt. 43-5, Declaration of Casandra Brown (“Brown Decl.”) § 8. … Brown Decl. § 8.

Erick Gallardo v. County of Orange et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 26, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009); see Moss v. … Id. at 694; see also Board of County Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (“We have consistently refused to hold municipalities liable under a theory of respondeat superior”).