Case law

Greater Oceans, Inc. v. Eric Thorstenson

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2021

If only a portion or portions 21 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 23 … If only a portion or 5 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).

Lighthouse Healthcare Center, LLC v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2025

If only a 16 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 17 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 8 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior

Cynthia Speed v. Delta Air Lines Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2025

If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins). … If only a 28 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 1 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 2 in the margins).

Christina Astorga v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 22, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 2 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 3 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 14 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

John Roe CF 85 v. DOE 1, a corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins).

John Roe NR 52 v. Doe 1

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins).

Estate of James R. Jenkins v. Beverly Hills Senior Care Facility, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2021

The HHS Secretary is responsible for establishing procedures to administer this compensation program. … In this case, Defendants have failed to establish they acted “pursuant to a federal officer's directions.”

Jane Roe CP 76 v. Doe 1

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins).

RB Fashion & Design Inc. v. SEEUN Corp.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 24 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 25 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 12

SHAWN CZERWIEN and GEORGE v. DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION D/B/A HOKA

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 16 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 17 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 27 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 28 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 1

Rodney Shackelford and Erica Jones v. City of Los Angeles, Gabriel De Alba, Vivienne Read, Ulysses Robles, and Justin Peters

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 7 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 8 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 9 in the margins).

Chap Mei Plastic Toys Manufactory Limited v. NKOK, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 19, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 10 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 11 privilege review.

Lavelle Maurice Jackson v. AutoZoners, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 22 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 23 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 10

Donna Dosik v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 2024

If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins). … If only a 28 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 1 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 2 in the margins).

C. BRATTON v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

439 F. Supp. 2d 1039 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 2006

The Plan clearly vests discretion in MetLife. See Friedrich v. Intel Corp., 181 F.3d 1105 , 1110 n. 5 (9th Cir.1999). … Clearly, the definition of disability does not require a showing of objective medical evidence to establish disability- Implied additional plan terms are generally disfavored. Canseco v.

Mary Olsen Kelly v. Federal Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material 22 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 23 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 24 … If only a portion or portions of 9 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 10 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 11

Yaffa Basson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 2021

If only a 8 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 9 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 10 in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

S. David Sedaghat v. Jerry Roles

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 28, 2025

Co., 843 F.2d 1253, 1260 (9th Cir. 1988) (“The right to remove a state court case to federal court is clearly limited to defendants.”). … Furthermore, plaintiff has not established complete diversity of citizenship in that action.

Harel Talasazan v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 2026

The statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 3 was not intended to abrogate a state’s 16 Eleventh Amendment immunity. Dittman v. … The Supreme Judicial 21 Court of Massachusetts is established by the Massachusetts Constitution, Part 22 the Second, Chapter I, Arts.

Jenna Groom v. City of El Paso De Robles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 19, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 14 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 5 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate