Case law

Javiad Akhtar v. J. Mesa

698 F.3d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 5, 2012

Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744 (9th Cir. 2002). In United States v. … Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 936-37 (9th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Palila (Loxioides Bailleui, Formerly Psittirostra Bailleui), an Endangered Species Sierra Club National Audubon Society, a Non-Profit Association Hawaii Audubon Society, a Non-Profit Association Alan C. Ziegler, Plaintiffs v. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Susumo Ono in His Capacity as Chairman of the Hawaii Board of Land and Natural Resources, Defendants- Palila (Loxioides Bailleui, Formerly Psittirostra Bailleui), an Endangered Species Sierra Club National Audubon Society, a Non-Profit Association Hawaii Audubon Society, a Non-Profit Association Alan C. Ziegler, Plaintiffs v. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Susumo Ono in His Capacity as Chairman of the Hawaii Board of Land and Natural Resources, and Hawaii Rifle Association Gerald Kang, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants

852 F.2d 1106 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1988

Ziegler, Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES; Susumo Ono in his capacity as chairman of the Hawaii Board of Land and Natural Resources, Defendants- Appellants. … Sec. 455 ; or (3) the common law of reassignment--see, e.g., Brown v. Baden, 815 F.2d 575, 576 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 450 , 98 L.Ed.2d 390 (1987).

Usha Bhasin v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

423 F.3d 977 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 2005

Because neither the IJ nor the Board made any adverse credibility finding, we accept the petitioner’s factual contentions as true. Kalubi v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1134, 1137 (9th Cir.2004); Navas v. … We review the Board’s determination of purely legal questions de novo. Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000). Factual findings are reviewed for substantial evidence. Sharma v.

John Thymes v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

692 F. App'x 384 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 2017

BROWN, Jr., Attorney General, individually and in his official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees. … See Whitaker v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2026

Div. v. … See Brown-Forman Corp. v. NLRB, 169 F.4th 646, 657 (6th Cir. 2026).

Robert M. GONZALEZ, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANFORD APPLIED ENGINEERING, INC., Et Al., Defendant-Appellee

597 F.2d 1298 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1979

In an affidavit he states: “I am claiming discrimination based on national origin which includes the fact that my skin is brown. If Mexicans-Americans were not brown I do not believe they would suffer discrimination.” … Compare, e. g., Manzanares v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 593 F.2d 968 (8th Cir. 1979) with Budinsky v. Corning Glass Works, 425 F.Supp. 786 (W.D.Pa.1977).

Cerny v. Bail

24 F. App'x 833 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 2, 2002

We review de novo, Barnett v. … Butterfield v. Bail, 120 F.3d 1023, 1024 (9th Cir.1997). Because dismissals under Heck v.

Retail Digital Network v. Jacob Appelsmith

810 F.3d 638 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 2016

v. 2:11-cv-09065- CBM-PJW JACOB APPELSMITH, as Director of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, … Brown v. Entm’t Merchants Ass’n, 131 S. Ct. 2729, 2738 (2011).

Casino Pauma v. NLRB

888 F.3d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 2018

We also consider whether the Board permissibly 6 CASINO PAUMA V. NLRB applied the rule regarding employee solicitation established in Republic Aviation Corp. v. … The Board and Union argue that Casino Pauma did not exhaust before the Board the principal merits argument it makes before us—that, under Republic Aviation Corp. v.

Idaho Conservation League v. Bpa

83 F.4th 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 16, 2023

Dep’t of Educ. v. Brown, 143 S. Ct. 2343, 2350–51 (2023). There are three standing requirements Petitioners must meet for this court to 26 IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE V. … Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l USA, 568 U.S. 398, 410–11 (2013). The Supreme Court recently applied this analysis in Department of Education v. Brown.

Western Oil And Gas Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

633 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 1980

E. g., Brown v. EPA, 521 F.2d 827 , 838 n.45 (9th Cir. 1975). The EPA cites recent Supreme Court dictum approving the practice of agency relitigation, E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 313 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1723 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). This is a reasonable corollary of the Court's recent emphasis on the limited scope of judicial review of agency action.

Toufighi v. Mukasey

538 F.3d 988 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 2008

Najafi v. … This Court defers to the Board’s exercise of discretion unless it acted arbitrarily, irrationally or contrary to law. Caruncho v. INS, 68 F.3d 356, 360 (9th Cir.1995); Lainez-Ortiz v.

American Bankers Mortgage Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

75 F.3d 1401 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 1996

Corp. v. … Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 359 (5th Cir.1977) (relying on Northrip and holding that FNMA’s activities did not qualify as governmental action).

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Board of Equalization of the State of California, Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. Board of Equalization of the State of California, Trailer Train Company v. Board of Equalization of the State of California

828 F.2d 9 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 1987

828 F.2d 9 The ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. … SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. TRAILER TRAIN COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. v.

Margaret Wilder v. Arizona Board of Regents

510 F. App'x 535 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 21, 2013

Manatt v. Bank of Am., NA, 339 F.3d 792, 800 (9th Cir. 2003). Applying the burden-shifting framework articulated in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Hall v. Lalli, 952 P.2d 748, 750 (Ariz. 1997).

Frank v. Daley

776 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 13, 1985

Res Judicata (Claim Preclusion) The Franks argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979) requires reversal of the bankruptcy and district courts. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 129 n. 1, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 2208 n. 1, 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979).

Individuals For Responsible Government, Inc. v. Washoe County

110 F.3d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1997

United Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, --- U.S. ----, ----, 116 S.Ct. 1529, 1534 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (quoting Hunt v. … V.

Miller v. California Speedway Corp.

536 F.3d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 8, 2008

Botosan v. Paul McNally Realty, 216 F.3d 827, 834 (9th Cir.2000). … Id. at 1129 (citing Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of Am. v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., 142 F.Supp.2d 1293, 1297-98 (D.Or.2001)). The district court had followed Lara v.

Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Commission

934 F.2d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 11, 1991

Jeff D. v. Andrus, 899 F.2d 753, 759 (9th Cir.1989). … Vertex Distrib., Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., 689 F.2d 885, 893 (9th Cir.1982); Brown v. Neeb, 644 F.2d 551 , 558 n. 12 (6th Cir.1981).

Resident Minors of the City an v. Jerry Brown

482 F. App'x 293 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 24, 2012

Harris has been substituted for her predecessor, Jerry Brown, as California Attorney General under Fed. R. App. … We review de novo, Mortensen v. County of Sacramento, 368 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.