Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

0.93s

  • United States v. Fotopulos

    180 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 1950

    . §§ 1346 (b), 2671-2680, the object of which is to waive the general immunity -from liability for tort heretofore enjoyed by the Government. … “This language (of section 1346(b)) clearly means that the standards and tests of local law are to determine whether a negligent or wrongful act has been established which is actionable and the nature and extent of the recovery

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • J. Alfred Rider, M.D. v. United States Postal Service, an Executive Agency of the United States United States of America

    862 F.2d 239 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 1988

    See, e.g., Wagner, 847 F.2d at 519 (“A party seeking to raise estoppel against the government must establish ‘affirmative misconduct going beyond mere negligence’ ” (emphasis added) (quoting Morgan v. … Furthermore, while the “sue-and-be-sued” clause is a broad waiver of sovereign immunity, Congress has retained immunity for the Postal Service from tort claims “arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Barron v. United States

    654 F.2d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 27, 1981

    Moreover, its finding (which is one of mixed law and fact) that the work being done by Barron was extra hazardous is not clearly erroneous. … Finally, we also hold that the district court’s finding that the employee was not contributorily negligent is not clearly erroneous. Id. at 1085 . III.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Sharee Butler v. City of Sacramento

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 11, 2010

    I Perez is entitled to qualified immunity unless (1) the facts, viewed in the light most favorable to Butler, demonstrate a violation of a constitutional right and (2) that right was clearly established at the time … entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • John v. United States

    247 F.3d 1032 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 2001

    The agency possesses no expertise,, however, that qualifies it to determine whether the rural subsistence priority applies to navigable waters. … We would affirm the decision of the district court on the broader ground that, in a proper exercise of its Commerce' Clause powers, Congress clearly established a subsistence priority that applies to all navigable waters

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Wittman

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 2009

    Harris’s breach of contract claim is not created or determined by Title 11; it is a common law action, therefore it does not qualify for “arising under” juris- diction. … These acts of Wittman meet all four elements for derived quasi-judicial immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ready v. City of Mesa

    89 F. App'x 14 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 10, 2004

    The Defendants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on all of the Readys’ claims and invoked qualified immunity with respect to the Readys’ § 1983 claims. … Because the district court did not reach the qualified immunity question, we decline to do so on this appeal. .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • S. Thomas v. County of Los Angeles

    703 F. App'x 508 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 2017

    But it also granted Sheriff Baca qualified immunity. Then, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. … Nor did the district court err by granting qualified immunity to Sherriff Baca.

    Cited 4 timesUnpublished
  • Rehn v. City of Seattle

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2026

    Defendants appeal the district court’s denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment. Reviewing de novo and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, Rehn, Martinez v. … If a “robust consensus” makes the unlawfulness of the actions clear, officials are not entitled to qualified immunity. Id. at 874.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Glaros v. California Department of Transportation

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 2026

    County of San Diego, 993 F.3d 1134, 1141 (9th Cir. 2021) (decision regarding qualified immunity); Sato v. … City of Portland, 165 F.4th 1265, 1284 (9th Cir. 2026) (“A state actor is entitled to qualified immunity if his conduct did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Guadalupe Martinez-rodriguez v. United States

    375 F. App'x 743 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 14, 2010

    Kevin Wetteland, a DEA agent, appeals denials of his renewed summary judgment motion for qualified immunity and motion for reconsideration. … An officer is entitled to qualified immunity if, (1) in the light most favorable to the injured party, the alleged facts “show the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right,” and (2) the right violated was clearly

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Kerr Center Parents Ass'n v. Charles

    897 F.2d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1990

    By virtue of this agreement, the State qualifies for receipt of federal funds for special education. … The Eleventh Amendment clearly would prohibit the district court from awarding the plaintiffs restitution for benefits which were wrongfully withheld in the past.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Fairley v. Luman

    281 F.3d 913 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 15, 2002

    John presented evidence sufficient to establish the City’s warrant procedures constituted a “policy.” … This is true whether the officers are exonerated on the basis of qualified immunity, because they were merely negligent, or for other failure of proof. See Chew v.

    Cited 138 timesPublished
  • In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Dated April 18, 2003, John Doe v. United States

    383 F.3d 905 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 2004

    “A district court abuses its discretion if it bases its ruling on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.” Id. (quoting Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. v. … There, the government had granted act of production immunity and Hubbell later asserted that his immunity had been violated when the government used the documents it had subpoenaed from him to discover incriminating evidence

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Cardenas v. Anzai

    311 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 18, 2002

    Hawaii has established the Hawaii Tobacco Settlement Special Fund, into which its share of the tobacco settlement proceeds will be deposited. … by sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • James Denby v. David Engstrom

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 18, 2025

    We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 for interlocutory orders denying qualified immunity, Mitchell v. … S. ____ (2025), 2025 WL 247502, at *4 (Jan. 21, 2025) (citing Hope and affirming that “[g]eneral legal principles can constitute clearly established law” in the rigorous AEDPA context).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rifino v. United States

    245 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 2001

    The district court also dismissed appellee, the University of Washington, finding that sovereign immunity barred Rifino’s adversary proceeding. … Because the University of Washington withdrew its sovereign immunity claim on appeal to this court, we instruct the district court to vacate that part of its opinion.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. v. Bradshaw

    136 F.3d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 3, 1998

    The state also contends that the individual defendants in this case are entitled to qualified immunity. … Therefore, the individual defendants cannot claim qualified immunity as an affirmative defense to this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Katie John v. United States

    247 F.3d 1032 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 2001

    The agency possesses no expertise, however, that qualifies it to determine whether the rural subsistence priority applies to navigable waters. … Conclusion. 57 We would affirm the decision of the district court on the broader ground that, in a proper exercise of its Commerce Clause powers, Congress clearly established a subsistence priority that applies to all navigable

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.