Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Trans Ocean Export Packing, Inc., and Dewayne F. Titus

473 F.2d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 1973

Respondents refer to N.L.R.B. v. … Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364 , 86 S.Ct. 1531 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966); N. L. R. B. v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 108 F.2d 188, 189 (9th Cir. 1939).

National Labor Relations Board v. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District

469 F.2d 698 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 14, 1972

PER CURIAM: Enforcement of the order of the Board against the Lewiston District is denied for jurisdictional reasons. Our reading of NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Manufacturing Division, Di Giorgio Leisure Products, Inc.

483 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 31, 1973

We caution the Board that an explicit Gissel finding is required, and that the absence of one, in a close case, might justify remand to the Board. See e. g., New Alaska-Development Corp. v. … See, e. g., Self-Reliance Ukrainian American Cooperative Ass’n v. N.L.R.B., 461 F.2d 33 (7th Cir. 1972) ; N.L.R.B. v. Copps Corp., 458 F.2d 1227 (7th Cir. 1972) ; N.L.R.B. v.

Joseph Fischer v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

578 F. App'x 631 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 2014

No. 8:09-cv-00126-AG-JEM v. MEMORANDUM* EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.; FRANK X. CHAVEZ, Respondents - Appellees. … See Ylst v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Monticello Cedar Company, Inc.

429 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1970

NLRB v. Continental Nut Co. (9 Cir. 1968), 395 F.2d 830 ; cert. denied 393 U.S. 1000 , 89 S.Ct. 485 , 21 L.Ed.2d 464 (1968); NLRB v. Hood Corporation (9 Cir. 1965), 346 F.2d 1020 . … The Order of the Board will be enforced.

24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1340, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,400 Samuel Golden, Milo Gaskin, Manuel Navarro, Ernest Robinson and the Oakland Black Firefighters Association, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Local 55 of the International Association of Firefighters, Its Membership, and George Rosco, Richard Cecil, Jack Doan and Tom Kenton, as Individuals and as Officers of Local 55 of the International Association of Firefighters, Hanley Ornsby, as an Individual and as a Former Officer of Local 55, and the International Association of Firefighters

633 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1980

However, the Civil Service Board decided to allow those twelve to take the examination and waived any time in grade deficits. … See Warth v.

McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, and Robert H. Mourning, Intervenor

655 F.2d 932 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 12, 1981

Kaiser Engineers v. NLRB, 538 F.2d 1379, 1382 (9th Cir. 1976). The evidence focused on Mourning’s status. The Board found that Mourning was not a supervisor. … There was no need in this instance to remand for credibility findings; the Board was free to draw its own inferences from the record. NLRB v.

Eichler O. Kelly v. H. E. Springett, Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement

527 F.2d 1090 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 20, 1975

After ascertaining the facts, the California Franchise Tax Board entered an order to withhold income taxes from this fund and the commercial account. The funds were then delivered to the Board. … Brown v. Fogel, 395 F.2d 291 (CA4 1968); Ballou v. Massachusetts, 382 F.2d 292 (CA1 1967). Appellant does not claim that the California state bail system was administered with caprice or discrimination.

Whitney v. Arntz

320 F. App'x 799 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 2009

MEMORANDUM * Whitney, Hadley, Brelle and Kornow-Brown (collectively, Whitney) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment for Arntz. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 . … See Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Sup.

National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Company

402 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 24, 1968

402 F.2d 775 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … NLRB v. Campbell Soup Company, 378 F.2d 259 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 220 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967). 3 The Board order is entitled to enforcement. 1 Honorable E.

Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 3, 2024

Latshaw v. … The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brown’s motion to vacate the judgment because Brown failed to demonstrate he is entitled to such relief.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local No. 439, Paul McMillen Intervenor

837 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 27, 1988

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 538, 275 NLRB 730, 730 (1985) (quoting Teamsters Local 610 (Browning-Ferris Indus.), 264 NLRB 886 , 899-900 (1982)). … Thus, we will enforce the Board's order if it correctly applied the law. See NLRB v.

Shell Petroleum v. Graves

709 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 30, 1983

Lowry, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., Paul M. Dodyk, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant. Patricia Streloff, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Lloyd N. … Petroleum N.V. v.

Richard Douglas Furnish v. The Board of Medical Examiners of the State of California

257 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 21, 1958

American Surety Co. v. Baldwin, 1932, 287 U.S. 156, 164 , 53 S.Ct. 98 , 77 L.Ed. 231 ; Sexton v. Barry, 6 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 220, 225 ; General Exporting Co. v. … Ames, 1 Cir., 1911, 190 F. 138, 140 ; Furnald v. Glenn, 2 Cir., 1894, 64 F. 49, 54 ; Davega-City Radio v. Boland, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1938, 23 F.Supp. 969, 970 ; Ritholz v.

Board of Trustees of Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers v. Williams

758 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 20, 1985

758 F.2d 655 Board of Trustees of Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers v. Williams 83-2680 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 3/20/85 1 N.D.Cal. REMANDED

National Labor Relations Board v. International Association of MacHinists Lodge 942, Aflcio

265 F.2d 239 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 9, 1959

In a formal “opposition” filed with us the National Labor Relations Board does not oppose a stay of the notice-posting requirement of the decree as it relates to peaceful picketing but opposes any other stay by this Court … The Board suggests, and we agree, that to subject Alloy and its employees to this kind of pressure to select an unwanted representative would, if the Board’s view be ultimately sustained, result in a pro tanto impairment

United States v. John Brown

540 F. App'x 792 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 2013

No. 2:12-cr-00611-JFW v. MEMORANDUM * JOHN EUGENE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … We dismiss the remainder of Brown’s appeal of his conviction in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009).

Mechanical Specialties Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

414 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 1969

The Supreme Court’s opinion in NLRB v. … Moreover the Court (slip opinion p. 29) approved and summarized the Board’s Cumberland Shoe rule (Cumberland Shoe Corp., 144 N.L.R.B. 1268 (1964), enforced by the Sixth Circuit in N.L.R.B. v.

Weber v. Department of Veterans Affairs

512 F.3d 1178 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 15, 2008

Ward v. Brown, 22 F.3d 516, 520 (2d Cir.1994). Second, the comprehensive statutory *1182 scheme for the Veterans Health Administration (“VHA”) does not permit judicial review of Dr. Weber’s claims. … P’ship v.

Hughes Properties, Inc., D/b/a/ Harolds Club v. National Labor Relations Board

758 F.2d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 22, 1985

The Supreme Court approved the Board’s ruling, stressing the remoteness of the cafeteria from patient care and the heavy use of the cafeteria by hospital employees. Beth Israel Hospital v. … The Employer argues that to approve the Board’s decision in this case would conflict with our decision in NLRB v.