Opinion

Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jun 3, 2024
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.2%

explaining that Rule 60(b)(6) “is to be utilized only where extraordinary circumstances prevented a party from taking timely action to prevent or correct an erroneous judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that Rule 60(b)(6) “is to be utilized only where extraordinary circumstances prevented a party from taking timely action to prevent or correct an erroneous judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY TYREE BROWN, No. 22-35884

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-05975-BHS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RICHARD L. MORGAN; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Gregory Tyree Brown appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to

vacate the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Latshaw v. Trainer

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Wortham & Co., Inc., 452 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brown’s motion to

vacate the judgment because Brown failed to demonstrate he is entitled to such

relief. See id. at 1103 (explaining that Rule 60(b)(6) “is to be utilized only where

extraordinary circumstances prevented a party from taking timely action to prevent

or correct an erroneous judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 22-35884

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.