Case law

Financial Institution Employees, Local No. 1182 v. National Labor Relations Board

752 F.2d 356 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 2, 1984

Carpinteria Lemon Association v. … Scofield v. NLRB, 394 U.S. at 428 , 89 S.Ct. at 1157 ; see also United Steelworkers v.

Fisher v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION

633 F.3d 889 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 2, 2011

Within 14 days of the filing of this Order, each party shall submit a letter-brief addressing what effect, if any, the United States Supreme Court decision in Swarthout v.

Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization

858 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1988

As an agency of the State of California, the Board has no “citizenship” for the purposes of section 1332. See Moor v. … We, therefore, disregard the citizenship of the individual Board members in assessing jurisdiction under section 1335. See Northeast Federal Credit Union v.

Kashard Brown v. Brian Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 2023

Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 729–30 (1991). We affirm the denial of Brown’s petition. … Brown has not demonstrated cause to overcome this procedural default under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), because he fails to establish that his post- conviction counsel was ineffective under Strickland v.

Albina Engine & MacHine v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

627 F.3d 1293 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 2010

See Brown v. I.T.T./Cont’l Baking Co. & Ins. Co. of N. Am., 921 F.2d 289, 296 n.6 (D.C. … Bath Iron Works v. Brown, 194 F.3d 1, 5 n.4 (1st Cir. 1999). That interpretation is a misread- ing of Picinich, however.

Ronald Brown v. Donald Holbrook

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 10, 2023

There is no dispute that Brown’s habeas petition was filed outside the statute of limitations, and that the “prison mailbox rule” is inapplicable because Brown was not proceeding pro se. See Saffold v. … Luna v. Kernan, 784 F.3d 640, 646 (9th Cir. 2015). Finally, Brown is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

Lektophone Corp. v. Rola Co.

34 F.2d 764 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 23, 1929

Ed. 942 ; Grant v. Walter, 148 U. S. 547, 554 , 13 S. Ct. 699 , 37 L. Ed. 552 ; Gordon v. Warder, 150 U. S. 47 , 14 S. Ct. 32 , 37 L. Ed. 992 ; Lektophone Corp. v. Brandes Products Corp. (D. C.) 16 F.(2d) 934, 935 . … American Cone & Wafer Co. v. Denaro (C. C. A.) 297 F. 913, 916 , citing Roberts v. Ryer, 91 U. S. 150 , 23 L. Ed. 267 ; Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U. S. 186 , 14 S. Ct. 310 , 38 L. Ed. 121 .

United States v. John Frederick Weersing

415 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 1969

*132 BROWNING, Circuit Judge: Defendant was convicted of refusing to submit to induction in violation of 50 U.S.C.A. App. § 462. We affirm. … Little v.

Patricia Brown v. Carolyn Colvin

593 F. App'x 656 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 11, 2015

BROWN, No. 14-35214 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:13-cv-00048-SEH v. MEMORANDUM* CAROLYN W. … We review de novo, Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 2012), and affirm.

Arizona State Board for Charter Schools v. U.S. Department of Education

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 2006

ARIZONA STATE BOARD v. U.S. DEP’T OF EDUC. 11945 Land Bank of St. Paul v. … No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647, 2653, 2657 (2004). 11948 ARIZONA STATE BOARD v. U.S.

Umc Industries, Inc. v. Seaborg

439 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 24, 1971

Before KOELSCH, BROWNING, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. … See Whitney National Bank v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co., 379 U.S. 411 , [ 85 S.Ct. 551 , 13 L.Ed.2d 386 ] (1965); Gardner v. [State of Ala.

B-E-C-K McLaughlin & Associates, and v. The Renegotiation Board

443 F.2d 1180 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 1971

Gregory Brown v. Eldon Vail

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 15, 2023

Hung Lam v. City of San Jose, 869 F.3d 1077, 1085 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm. The district court properly denied Brown’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law. … The district court’s response to the jury’s question about Brown’s property interest was not a plain error that affected Brown’s substantial rights. See Hoard v.

MURRAY HOOPER V. DAVID SHINN

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 15, 2022

See Brown v. … Brown, 889 F.3d at 666.

Sun-Maid Growers of California, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

618 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 30, 1980

Alaska Roughnecks and Drillers Association v. … The Board’s conclusion that Sun-Maid violated the Act is amply supported by the evidence. Sheraton-Kauai Corp. v. N.L. R.B., 429 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1970).

Johnny Brown v. Brian Williams

597 F. App'x 417 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 12, 2015

Brown has not shown that the Nevada Supreme Court unreasonably applied the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel found in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). … Wood v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 542

460 F.2d 1067 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 1972

PER CURIAM: The Board’s Decision and Order, based essentially upon an exhaustive report of its Hearing Examiner, is reported at 191 NLRB No. 79 . … Our review of the record convinces us that the Board’s Order should be enforced ; accordingly, the Petition for Enforcement is granted.

Woodmere, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. National Labor Relations Board, And

432 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 1970

PER CURIAM: Woodmere, Inc., petitions for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 175 N.L.R.B. No. 69. The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. … The Board’s petition for enforcement is granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

254 F. App'x 582 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 9, 2007

A remedial order of the Board may be overturned only when there is a clear abuse of discretion, United Steel Workers of Am. AFL-CIO-CLC v. … NLRB, 482 F.3d 1112, 1114, 1116 (9th Cir.2007), or when the Board’s factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence. East Bay Auto. Council v. NLRB, 483 F.3d 628, 633 (9th Cir.2007).

Brian Brown v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 2023

challenged the authority of the ALJ who presided over Brown’s hearings, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Carr v. … After the ALJ presided over Brown’s administrative hearings but before the ALJ issued a decision, the Supreme Court issued Lucia v. SEC, 138 S.