Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Stanislaus Implement and Hardware Company, Ltd.

226 F.2d 377 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 12, 1955

In N.L.R.B. v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; N. L. R. B. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 9 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 79, 85 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Southern California Edison Co.

646 F.2d 1352 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1981

Other appellate courts have upheld the Board’s position. E. g., NLRB v. Alamo Express, Inc., 430 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 584 , 27 L.Ed.2d 633 (1970); Teamsters Local 657 v. … See Amcar Division, ACF v. National Labor Relations Board, 641 F.2d 561 (8th Cir. 1981), 33 Daily Labor Report, D-l. .

General Teamsters Local 162 v. National Labor Relations Board

568 F.2d 665 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 30, 1978

B. v. Hyde’s Supermarket, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 568, 572 . This is true regardless of the employer’s state of mind. N. L. R. B. v. M & M Oldsmobile, Inc., 2 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 712, 716-17 ; N. L. R. B. v. … We might agree that it is, but we conclude that the Board’s discretion in framing remedies is so broad that we should defer to its judgment. See N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Elixir Industries

682 F.2d 867 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 1982

The National Labor Relations Board requests enforcement of its bargaining order against Elixir Industries. … NLRB v. Big Three Industries, Inc., 602 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1979). Thus, their exclusion from the bargaining unit was appropriate. The order is enforced.

Carol Brown v. John Potter

457 F. App'x 668 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 3, 2011

Brown engaged in the protected activities of filing six EEO complaints and initiating this action in district court. Pardi v. Kaiser Found. … Brown. While Brown did not file an EEO complaint after her demotion, her claim on that score is “like or reasonably related to” her previous EEO complaints, Leong v.

James Dycus v. National Labor Relations Board

615 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 1980

P 11,883 James DYCUS, Petitioner, v. … See NLRB v. Iron Workers Local 103, 434 U.S. 335, 350 , 98 S.Ct. 651, 660 , 54 L.Ed.2d 586 (1978) (Board's construction of section 8(a)(5), (b)(7)(C) & (f) of the Act is entitled to considerable deference); NLRB v.

Top of Waikiki, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

429 F.2d 419 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 1970

N.L.R.B., supra; N.L.R.B. v. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 F.2d 913 (9th Cir. 1963); Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B., 357 F.2d 500 (9th Cir. 1966). … See: Pacific Electricord Company v. N.L.R.B., 361 F.2d 310 (9th Cir. 1966); Signal Oil and Gas Company v. N.L.R.B., 390 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1968).

National Labor Relations Board v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc.

405 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 1968

While the Board might well have gone the other way (as the hearing examiner did), we find substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s finding that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National … Accordingly the Board’s order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.

Saratoga Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

879 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 14, 1989

The Board may reverse the AU if it explains its reasons for doing so. See Sterling Drug, Inc. v. … See Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 678 F.Supp. 925, 926-27 (D.D.C.1987).

Salt River Valley Water Users Ass’n v. National Labor Relations Board

206 F.2d 325 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 1953

McComb v. … Cusano v. N.L.R.B., 3 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 898 . The Board also found that certain remarks made by S. H. Angle, a supervisory watermaster of the Association, to Zanjero H. C.

Iron Workers Local 118 v. National Labor Relations Board

804 F.2d 1100 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 1986

NLRB v. Iron Workers Local 118, 720 F.2d 1031 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam); NLRB v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Local No. 433, 730 F.2d 768 (9th Cir.1984). … Sandia Corp., 639 F.2d 600, 627 (10th Cir.1980); NLRB v. Madison Courier, Inc., 472 F.2d 1307, 1318 (D.C.Cir.1972); Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. NLRB, 403 F.2d 145, 149 (2d Cir.1968); NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. R. O. Pyle Roofing Co.

560 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1977

P 10,164 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. R. O. PYLE ROOFING CO., Robert Dixon d/b/a Custom Roofing, Deloris Terhaar and Marvin Terhaar d/b/a Inland Empire Roofers, Respondents. No. 76-2274. … We further hold that the Board correctly found an unfair labor practice when Pyle refused to adhere to the agreement negotiated on his behalf. NLRB v. Goodsell & Vocke, Inc., 559 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir. 1977), NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Driver Salesmen

670 F.2d 855 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1982

P 13,370 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co., --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 2789 , 69 L.Ed.2d 672 (1981); NLRB v. United Broth. of Carpenters & Joiners, supra, 531 F.2d at 427 .

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

605 F.2d 493 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 20, 1979

of Education v. … The principal holding in both cases was that the school boards had operated a dual system as of 1954, the date of Brown v.

Aguayo v. Tomco Carburetor Co.

853 F.2d 744 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 1988

See Brown v. … See Brown v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co., 218 F.2d 542, 544 (9th Cir.1955) (where the law entitles the Board to the injunctive relief sought, district court directed to grant the relief); Eisenberg v.

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

659 F.2d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 24, 1981

(BNA) 3352 Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board 79-4265 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 7/24/81 D.Hawaii AFFIRMED

Dalton, Brown & Long Inc. v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.

73 F. App'x 229 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 2003

MEMORANDUM ** Dalton, Brown, and Long appeals the District Court’s decision granting summary judgment to Executive Risk. We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, Oliver v. … Keller, 289 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2002), applying California substantive law to the interpretation of the contract in dispute, Stanford Ranch, Inc. v. Maryland Cos. Co., 89 F.3d 618, 624 (9th Cir.1996). We affirm.

William A. BROWN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIERRA NEVADA MEMORIAL MINERS HOSPITAL, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

849 F.2d 1186 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1988

Sierra then reported its result to the State Board of Medical Quality Assurance (BMQA). The BMQA found Brown’s medical care adequate, and did not discipline him. … Documents of the Board of Medical Quality Assurance and Sierra’s Judicial Review Committee As indicated above, the BMQA conducted an investigation into Brown’s competence after Sierra revoked Brown’s privileges.

General Teamsters Local 959 v. National Labor Review Board

743 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 1984

of fact ... but the Board’s interpretation of the Act and the Board’s application of it in doubtful situations are entitled to weight.” … NLRB v. Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, Local 459, 228 F.2d 553, 559 (2d Cir.1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 1025 , 100 L.Ed. 1483 (1956).

Shelly & Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

497 F.2d 1200 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1974

(Company) petitioned this court to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board. 199 N.L.R.B. No. 31 (Sept. 22, 1972). *1202 The Board cross-petitioned for enforcement of its order. … The Company’s petition to set aside the Board’s order is denied. The Board's cross-petition for enforcement is granted. Enforced.