Case law

Florentina Demuth v. County of Los Angeles

798 F.3d 837 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 2015

We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its grant of qualified immunity de novo. … This doctrine protects government officials from suits for damages unless their actions violated “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v.

Ceramic Corp. of America v. Inka Maritime Corp.

1 F.3d 947 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 1993

Even where the defendant is amenable to process in the alternative forum, however, there may be “rare circumstances” in which the “remedy provided by the alternative forum is so clearly inadequate or unsatisfactory that it … Because Japan will “not permit litigation of the subject matter of the dispute,” we are confronted with one of those rare instances where the remedy 'provided by the alternative forum is *950 “clearly unsatisfactory.”

Rudebusch v. Hughes

313 F.3d 506 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 2002

Equal Protection Claims ajnd Qualified Immunity Under Saucier v. … have been violated were [Rudebusch’s] allegations established, there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity.”

Armando Villanueva v. State of California

986 F.3d 1158 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 2021

CLEVELAND of federal law that was clearly established at the time,” Pauluk v. Savage, 836 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2016). “We review the district court’s conclusions regarding qualified immunity de novo.” … However, because it believed there was such division, it simply reasoned that the law was not clearly established and ruled for the officers on the basis of qualified immunity. Id. at 1213.

Jamie Kirkpatrick v. County of Washoe

843 F.3d 784 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 2016

“Qualified immunity is no immunity at all if ‘clearly established’ law can simply be defined as the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” Sheehan, 135 S.Ct. at 1776 . … , established, and they, .are therefore entitled to qualified immunity..on this claim.

Salvador Negrete v. G. Lewis

585 F. App'x 364 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 2014

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity because during his two-year placement in the prison’s modified program, it would not have been clear to a reasonable prison official … Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 (2009) (defendants are entitled to qualified immunity where there is no violation of plaintiff’s constitutional right or the right at issue was not “clearly established”); see also Noble v.

C.F. Ex Rel Farnan v. Capistrano Unified School District

654 F.3d 975 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 19, 2011

The district court granted these motions and ultimately held that, although the Peloza comment violated the Establishment Clause, the law was not clearly established, so Corbett was protected by qualified immunity. … [8] The Supreme Court has recently reiterated that we must not “define clearly established law at a high level of generali- ty” when analyzing whether the qualified immunity standard is met. Al-Kidd, 131 S.

Daniel Chavez v. David Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 2016

clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … Chavez’s pro se complaint did not clearly show that he would be unable to overcome qualified immunity.

Merriman v. Walton

856 F.2d 1333 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 7, 1988

The court characterized the question in terms of probable cause and an assertion of qualified immunity. … (albeit fact-specific) question whether a reasonable officer could have believed [the plaintiff's] warrantless [arrest] to be lawful, in light of clearly established law and the information the searching officers possessed

Robert Wilk v. Dwight Neven

956 F.3d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 23, 2020

The court held that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because Wilk’s evidence, even if true, did not establish an Eighth Amendment violation. … Law is “clearly established” for the purposes of qualified immunity if “every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates th[e] right” at issue. Taylor v.

Estate of Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. Gelhaus

871 F.3d 998 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 22, 2017

Step Two—Whether the right was clearly established. … The • court therefore discussed only step two in its separate section on qualified immunity. It concluded that the law was "clearly established” that Gelhaus's conduct was unconstitutional.

C v. Ex Rel. Villegas v. City of Anaheim

823 F.3d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 25, 2016

The panel nevertheless held that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because it was not clearly established on January 7, 2012, that using deadly force in this situation, even viewed in the light most favorable … Alternatively, the district court held that Bennallack was entitled to qualified immunity because it was not clearly established that his conduct violated the Fourth Amendment.

Armonia Rigsby v. County of Los Angeles

531 F. App'x 811 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 2013

Assuming arguendo that Plaintiffs’ privacy rights were violated, Defendant social workers are entitled to qualified immunity because the rights that Plaintiffs seek to protect were not clearly established at the time of … United States, 373 F.3d 952, 976 (9th Cir. 2004) (concluding that right was not clearly established because the Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court had never squarely addressed the alleged right).

Javier Vanegas v. City of Pasadena

46 F.4th 1159 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 31, 2022

CITY OF PASADENA qualified immunity analysis—whether the unlawfulness of the officers’ conduct was not “clearly established.” … And even if no probable cause existed under state law, they contend they are still entitled to qualified immunity given there was no violation of clearly established law.

Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil Maloney

851 F.2d 1212 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 13, 1988

Qualified immunity State officials cannot be held liable for damages under § 1983 unless their conduct violates a clearly established constitutional right. Davis v. … away clearly established law.

Estella Lucero v. Dennis B. Hart, Rugh J. Papp, and Susie Mitchell

915 F.2d 1367 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 1990

Government officials are immune from liability for civil damages under § 1983 unless their conduct violates “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … Under Harlow’s “reasonable person” test, no clearly established statutory or constitutional right was violated. Thus, the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity is affirmed. B.

Rudolph STECKL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-Appellee

703 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 4, 1983

We agree with the district court that Steckl had established a prima facie case of discrimination as required by Texas Department of Community Affairs v. … He was clearly within the protected class, had applied for an available position for which he was qualified, and was denied a promotion which was given to a younger person.

Dennis Grimes v. James Tilton

384 F. App'x 603 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 2010

Defendant prison officials appeal from the district court’s order denying them qualified immunity in California state prisoner Dennis Grimes’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. … were clearly established in late 2005 and 2006 when defendants denied his requests for a vegetarian diet based on his religious beliefs.

Patricia Polanco v. Ralph Diaz

76 F.4th 918 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 7, 2023

NELSON, dissenting: Because the law is not clearly established, I conclude that the Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. … Id. at 1121 (granting qualified immunity because it found the law was not clearly established).

Estate of Jeffrey Ford v. Ramirez-Palmer

301 F.3d 1043 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 23, 2002

Each moved for summary judgment on qualified immunity. … was clearly established.