Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca7

9,632 results

1.15s

  • Pamela Hanson v. Caterpillar, Incor

    688 F.3d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 3, 2012

    We must affirm a grant of summary judgment if Hanson cannot establish an element of her ADA claim on which she would bear the burden of proof at trial. Harney v. … Caterpillar’s willing- ness to place Hanson in other jobs within her medical restrictions clearly belies the claim that the company subjectively regarded her as unable to perform a broad class of jobs.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Regina SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONLEN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant

    173 F.3d 1039 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 18, 1999

    Venters, 123 F.3d at 973 (“But the evidence need not be this obvious to qualify as direct evidence.”). … She was an undisputedly qualified employee with a long and hitherto substantially unbroken work history. Evidence was given that comparable jobs were available.

    Cited 148 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works

    947 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 23, 1991

    “The proper comparison is between the racial composition of the at-issue jobs and the racial composition of the qualified population in the relevant labor market.” … However, for the purposes of disparate impact, a more affirmative act by the employer must be shown in order to establish causation.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Palmetto Properties v. County of DuPage

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 7, 2004

    First, under the law as adopted in 1986, DuPage County required all adult businesses to locate in a zoning district designated “industrial” and banned such establish- ments from locating within 1000 feet of other adult busi … Although we have not gone so far as to hold that Buckhannon applies to all fee-shifting statutes, we have held that it is conclusively presumed to so apply absent a clearly contrary indication in the “text, structure, or

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mohsin Siddiqui v. Eric Holder, Jr.

    670 F.3d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 12, 2012

    Siddiqui was then convicted of a crime in 1991 that did not qualify as a deportable offense under then-existing laws. … In Batanic, our first inquiry was to discern whether Congress had clearly spoken. See id. at 665.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sandor Demkovich v. St. Andrew the Apostle Parish

    973 F.3d 718 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 31, 2020

    The First Amend- ment does not require complete immunity from the some- times horrific abuse that defendants’ bright-line rule would protect. … The ministe- rial exception does not confer general immunity from a min- ister’s tort claims or from criminal laws.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Clay v. Fort Wayne Community Schools

    76 F.3d 873 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 16, 1996

    Therefore, the adult plaintiffs in their individual capacities are not qualified to bring an appeal on behalf of the student class. … Appellants' inability to establish standing rests squarely on one false proposition alleged by Appellants: the plaintiffs "have a Constitutional right to have a Black person considered for the Office of Superintendent of

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Joseph Young v. James Rabideau and Stephen Washington

    821 F.2d 373 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 1, 1987

    under the eighth amendment and would have helped to negate Rabideau’s claim of immunity, a defense available to him as a state prison official under § 1983. … Such evidence is clearly relevant to contradict Young’s defense of lack of intent. See United States v. Brunson, 657 F.2d at 115 .

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Crowley, Daniel v. McKinney, Donald

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 11, 2005

    As should be apparent from our discussion, the existence of the right that Crowley asserts is not established law, and McKinney is therefore immune from having to pay damages for violating that right. … I would therefore find that Crowley has stated a claim, and that Principal McKinney is not entitled to qualified immu- nity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Demonta Hambright v. Paul Kemper

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 8, 2017

      immunity because, as of 2013, it was not clearly established that rescheduling the feast  eight days after Ramadan’s end violated the First Amendment.        … Finally Hambright challenges the magistrate judge’s ruling that Wahlstrom and  Nurdeen were entitled to qualified immunity, given that Hambright had no clearly  established right to have the feast served within three days

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States of America v. City of Chicago

    549 F.2d 415 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 11, 1977

    Job-relatedness can only be determined where the criteria for selection are clearly identified. … “Qualified” in this context seems to refer to candidates who have been listed on an eligibility roster pursuant to Illinois law.

    Cited 160 timesPublished
  • Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States

    856 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 8, 2017

    For one, as I alluded to above, “it is well established that RRTA and FICA are parallel statutes.” BNSF Ry. Co. v. United States, 775 F.3d 743, 754 (5th Cir. 2015). … However, “absent a clearly established congressional intention, repeals by implication are not favored.” Branch v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jessica Arong O'Brien

    953 F.3d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 13, 2020

    The indictment plainly alleged that the scheme to defraud affected Citibank, which O’Brien does not dispute qualified as a financial institution. … Reyn- olds, 189 F.3d 521, 525–26 (7th Cir. 1999) (affirming conviction and finding sufficient evidence of materiality “[b]ecause [de- fendant]’s false statements regarding his financial condition could clearly influence a

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Weaver

    499 F.2d 155 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 9, 1974

    Smith establishes that, at least in the absence of congressional authorization for the exclusion clearly evidenced from the Social Security Act or its legislative history, a state. eligibility standard that excludes persons … Since 1941 HEW and its predecessors have consistently interpreted the Act so as to provide benefits to unborn children who in all other aspects save birth qualify as needy dependent children.

    Vacated on other grounds by Trainor v. Wilson, 420 U.S. 999 (1975)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Luis Montes

    381 F.3d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 24, 2004

    In sum, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Mr. … Alvarado, 326 F.3d 857, 862 (7th Cir.2003) (noting that "it is well established that the district court’s choice of whom to believe is almost never vulnerable to a finding of clear error”); United States v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Salvatore Arcidiacono v. Elizabeth Whitehorn

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 8, 2026

    Three of the four plaintiffs had al- ready qualified for Illinois’s Medicaid program—and more specifically, for long-term care benefits. The fourth qualified not long after her admission. See ILL. ADMIN. … We confess that Banks could have more clearly articulated the distinction between forward-looking and backward- looking remedies.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shanahan v. City of Chicago

    82 F.3d 776 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 6, 1996

    He asserts that the judge gave improper and erroneous weight to testimony that the rejected applicants were “qualified” for the subject positions. … The court clearly did not abuse its discretion. First, the form of the request — a passing reference in a footnote of his response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment— was improper.

    Cited 153 timesPublished
  • The United States of America v. Claude Mark Lightfoot

    228 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 26, 1956

    It seems clear that he was qualified as an expert witness on the subject about which he testified. In any event, whether the witness was qualified as an expert was a matter confined to the discretion of the trial judge. … Had the defendant confined his advocacy and teaching for a change in our form of government within the limits of constitutional processes, he would clearly have been protected by the First Amendment.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • American Photographic Pub. Co. v. Ziff-Davis Pub. Co.

    135 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 7, 1943

    Room, established 1898 The American Photographer., Established 1879 Photographic Topics, Established 1902 The American Journal op Photography, Est. 1879 The Amateur Photographer’s The Photo Beacon, Established 1888 Weekly … , Est. 1912 American Amateur Photographer, Established 1889 Popular Photography, Established 1912 Camera Notes, Established 1897 Photo Craft, Established 1897 Plaintiff contends that by keeping Popular Photography on its

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Konczak v. Tyrrell

    603 F.2d 13 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 12, 1979

    established constitutional rights that his action cannot be reasonably characterized as being in good faith.” … Disposing of the remaining arguments, we note that the Congress plainly provided in the language of Section 1988 and this court clearly stated in Dawson v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.