Case law

Planned Parenthood Association of Cincinnati, Inc. Norman E. Matthews, M.D. v. The City of Cincinnati & Stanley Broadnax, M.D.

822 F.2d 1390 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1987

And such discussion can be healthy, I believe; without widespread public discussion of Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), for example, who can say that the public would have come to believe as firmly as it has that the Supreme Court reached the right result in Brown and the

Warner Collieries Co. v. United States

63 F.2d 34 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 20, 1933

See Magee v. U. S., 282 U. S. 432, 434 , 51 S. Ct. 195 , 75 L. Ed. 442 ; Independent I. & C. Storage Co. v. Commr., 50 F.(2d) 31, 33 (C. C. A. 5); Lucas v. Hunt, 45 F.(2d) 781, 782 (C. C. A. 5); Hartwell Mills v. … See Bailey v. R. R. Co., 22 Wall. 604 (641) 22 L. Ed. 840 ; James v. Germania Iron Co., 107 F. 597, 617 (C. C. A. 8); Souffront v. La Compagnie des Sucreries, 217 U. S. 475, 487 , 30 S. Ct. 608 , 54 L. Ed. 846 .

Wendell Bills v. Murray Henderson

631 F.2d 1287 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1980

In Meachum v. Fano, supra, and Montanye v. … We reject defendants’ contention that such a statement, although made by the Board, need not be given to the inmate. As stated, in addition to serving the purposes outlined in Wolff v.

Shazor v. Professional Transit Management, Ltd.

744 F.3d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 2014

At least one Board member indicated that he suspected Plaintiff was not being honest about Hock’s availability—Hock had a history of working with SORTA, and No. 13-3253 Shazor v. … See Davis v. Cintas Corp., 717 F.3d 476, 491 (6th Cir. 2013). Defendants have offered the explanation that Hock apparently believed that Plaintiff had lied to SORTA Board members.

Marathon Ashland Petroleum v. Bill Williams

733 F.3d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 24, 2013

Corp. v. … New Orleans (Gulfwide) Stevedores v. Turner, 661 F.2d 1031, 1043 (5th Cir. 1981). The board therefore properly affirmed the ALJ’s finding that No. 12-4377 Marathon Ashland Petroleum, et al. v.

Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless & Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 v. Blackwell

467 F.3d 999 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 2006

See Ross v. Rell, 398 F.3d 203 (2d Cir.2005); Berrigan v. Sigler, 475 F.2d 918 (D.C.Cir.1973); United States v. Wood, 295 F.2d 772 (5th Cir.1961). … Hancock v.

John Higgins v. International Union

398 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 2005

Co. v. … Bagsby v.

Moore v. City of Harriman

272 F.3d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 8, 2001

See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 592 (6th Cir.1989). Wells’s pleading requirements for § 1983 claimants rest on two rationales. … See Brown v. Shaner, 172 F.3d 927, 934 (6th Cir.1999). We are satisfied that the requirements of Rule 15(c)(3) have been met here.

Duane K. Brown v. Michael A. Bruno

767 F.2d 919 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1985

BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL A. BRUNO, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. … Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430-1 (1976). We agree with the conclusion of the district court. 3 The motion for counsel is denied.

Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23944s Gary Anderson v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers of America

150 F.3d 590 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 31, 1998

See Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 110 , 109 S.Ct. 948 , 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989). … See, e.g., Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v.

Mills v. Killebrew

765 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1985

See Johnson v. Granholm, 662 F.2d 449, 450 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1120 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); Campbell v. … See also Pulliam v. Allen, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1970, 1983 , 80 L.Ed.2d 565 (Powell, J., dissenting).

Abdulahad v. Holder

581 F.3d 290 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 2009

As the Seventh Circuit stated in Petrov v. … Gishta v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 972, 979 (6th Cir.2005). We agree with the Board that “the record of proceedings [is] sufficient for our review on appeal.

United States v. Judith Ann Huguenin (97-5152) and William A. Martin (97-5160)

154 F.3d 547 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 1998

As explained by the Court in Brown v. … See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. at 734-35 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 ; South Dakota v.

Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

375 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 1966

In National Bank of Detroit v. … In Stark v.

G. F. Stearns Land & Lumber Co. v. Asher

295 F. 268 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 18, 1924

Bryant v. Kentucky Co., 144 Ky. 755 , 139 S. … The Brown title came back to defendants in 1916.

Edwards v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

99 F. App'x 658 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 19, 2004

Amen v. City of Dearborn, 718 F.2d 789, 793-94 (6th Cir.1983). Reviewing the issue of subject matter jurisdiction de novo, Friends of the Crystal River v. … See, e.g., Jones v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 728 F.2d 257, 265 (6th Cir.1984). B.

T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Charter Township of West Bloomfield

691 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2012

Commc’ns v. City of Mequon, 352 F.3d 1147, 1148 (7th Cir. 2003)); MetroPCS, Inc. v. … That the Zoning Ordinance (Section 26-49 a.10) specifies that the Township Board found that the presence of numerous towers and pole No. 11-1568 T-Mobile Cent. v. Twp. of W.

Vicki Marsh v. Genentech Inc.

693 F.3d 546 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 2012

Citing our decision in Garcia v. … Brown v. Cassens Transp. Co., 675 F.3d 946, 953 (6th Cir. 2012). III. ANALYSIS A.

National Labor Relations Board v. Jimco Fire Protection, Inc.

98 F.3d 1342 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. JIMCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC., Respondent. No. 96-6082. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 8, 1996. NLRB, Nos. 7-CA-37673, 7-CA-37860. NLRB ORDER ENFORCED. … JUDGMENT 1 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") for the enforcement of a certain order on consent issued by the Board against respondent Jimco Fire Protection,

All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

540 F. App'x 484 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 2013

V & S ProGalv, Inc. v. NLRB, 168 F.3d 270, 276 77 (6th Cir. 1999) (citation omitted). Indeed, we will accept the Board’s credibility determinations “unless they have no rational basis.” Fluor Daniel, Inc. v. … See V & S ProGalv, Inc. v.