Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. St. Mary's Acquisition Co.

240 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 14, 2007

Universal Camera Corp. v. … Id. at 693 (citing NLRB v.

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Thomas Perez

778 F.3d 507 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 18, 2015

Co. v. … Norfolk Southern petitions for review of the Board’s decision. See 49 U.S.C. § 20109(d)(4). No. 14-3274 Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v.

United States v. Darwin Andrew Beatty

350 F.2d 287 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 31, 1965

United States v. Willard, 312 F.2d 605 (CA 6,1963). … Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389 , 74 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed. 132 ; Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 , 75 S.Ct. 392 , 99 L.Ed. 428 ; United States v. Willard, supra; United States v.

Morgan v. Tennessee Valley Authority

115 F.2d 990 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1940

Earlier cases had recognized the concept, Parsons v. United States 167 U.S. 324 , 17 S.Ct. 880 , 42 L.Ed. 185 ; Shurtleff v. United States, 189 U.S. 311 , 23 S.Ct. 535, 536 , 47 L.Ed. 828 . … Springer v. Philippine Islands, 277 U.S. 189 , 48 S.Ct. 480 , 72 L.Ed. 845 ; Myers v. United States, supra.

Samuel L. Julian v. United States

236 F.2d 155 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 17, 1956

A willful failure to report to the local draft board involves the element of criminal intent, which must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in a prosecution for violating this statute. United States v. … Stahl in any way limited the authority of the civilian local board to hear the case or deprived it of independent judgment. Cf. United States v. Diercks, 7 Cir., 223 F.2d 12 .

Gerald J. Streeter v. National Labor Relations Board

835 F.2d 879 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1987

STREETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Defendant-Appellee No. 87-1662. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 10, 1987. Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., MILBURN and ALAN E. … Salahuddin v. Harris, 782 F.2d 1127, 1132 (2d Cir.1986). 6 In the present case, the plaintiff requested the district court to set a hearing date.

Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner

543 F.3d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 2008

Colvin v. Brunner, No.2008-1813. This was followed by *360 an action brought by a different group of plaintiffs in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. See Project Vote v. … Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. Blackwell, 467 F.3d 999, 1005-06 (6th Cir.2006) (“NEOCH ”).

Kathleen A. Walsh v. Cuyahoga County, and Terry Allan

424 F.3d 510 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 21, 2005

Berryman v. Rieger, 150 F.3d 561, 563 (6th Cir.1998). … Moore v. Board of Education of the Johnson City Schools, 134 F.3d 781, 785 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 929 , 119 S.Ct. 336 , 142 L.Ed.2d 277 (1998) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Logan v.

Song v. City of Elyria, Ohio

985 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 1993

Elyria Ordinance No. 91-22 prohibits massagists who are not licensed by the state medical board from massaging persons of the opposite gender ("cross-massaging"). … United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 442 , 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1711-12 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). The ban on bills of attainder limits the role of the legislature to formulating general rules.

United States v. Harry William Daniels, Jr.

429 F.2d 1273 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 30, 1970

Bridger v. Union Ry., 355 F.2d 382, 391-392 (6th Cir. 1966). There is, of course, no doubt that appellant’s Selective Service Board was located in the Eastern District of Kentucky. … He was charged with failing to report to that Board for instructions. Thus, the failure to report occurred in the Eastern District of Kentucky, as charged in the indictment. See Johnston v.

Elizabeth Cristales-de Linares v. Pamela Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 2025

When the Board issues its own decision but agrees with the IJ’s reasoning, we focus our review on the Board’s decision and examine the IJ’s decision to the extent the Board adopted it. Harmon v. … The Board then summarily rejected her third proffered PSG—“salon owners  No. 25-3152 Cristales-de Linares, et al. v.

United States v. McNeese

819 F.3d 922 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 2016

But in Freeman v. … But the Eighth Circuit’s opinion in Brown does not support a relaxed application of Freeman in “ambiguous” cases, nor could it. See United States v.

Uhi, Inc., D/B/A University Hospital v. Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary of Health and Human Services

250 F.3d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 2001

See Katt v. … See, e.g., GTE Midwest, Inc. v.

Carson Brown v. Thomas Taylor Daniel Gibler

894 F.2d 1336 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 1, 1990

Brown failed to allege facts showing an egregious abuse of governmental power which interfered with his first amendment rights of expression. See Vinson v. … Newsom v.

Darryl McGore v. Gene Borgert Robert Brown

908 F.2d 973 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 26, 1990

Darryl MCGORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene BORGERT; Robert Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-2338. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 26, 1990. Before KEITH and RALPH B. … Harris v.

Tennessee, Alabama & Georgia Ry. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

187 F.2d 826 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 1951

This principle has been repeatedly invoked by the Commissioner and applied by the Board. Carter Publications, Inc. v. Commissioner, 28 B.T.A. 160 ; Warner Co. v. … See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Brown Shoe Co., 8 Cir., 175 F.2d 305, 308 (C.A.8).

Thomas v. Chattanooga Cty

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 2005

The Doe Court found that even where a school board had some information that one of its teachers may have sexually abused students in the past and the board failed to remove him before he abused the plaintiff, the school … board could not be found liable for having a policy, custom, or practice of condoning such abuse because there was no evidence that the school board failed to act regarding other teachers in similar circumstances; thus there

United States v. Andre Price

901 F.3d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 2018

United States v. Brown, 639 F.3d 735, 738 (6th Cir. 2011). … Brown, 639 F.3d at 737.

Peabody Coal Company Old Republic Insurance Company v. Arthur E. Hill

123 F.3d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 18, 1997

The scope of our review of decisions of the Board is limited. Consolidation Coal Co. v. McMahon, 77 F.3d 898, 900 (6th Cir.1996). … This court must affirm the Board’s decision if the Board has not committed any legal error or exceeded its statutory scope of review of the ALJ’s factual determinations. Director, OWCP v.

Ohio State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Husted

769 F.3d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 12, 2014

Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 , 129 S.Ct. 1749 , 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009) (quoting Virginian R. Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658, 672-73 , 47 S.Ct. 222 , 71 L.Ed. 463 (1926)). … Defendants point to their experience in the early-voting case from 2012, Obama for America v. Husted, 697 F.3d 423 (6th Cir.2012).