Case law

Geoffrey N. Fieger v. Philip J. Thomas, Grievance Administrator, and Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission

74 F.3d 740 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1996

In New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. … Distribs. v.

Howard v. Wilbur

166 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 15, 1948

Nor does the case fall within the ruling of such cases as Morrison v. Hess, Mo.Sup., 231 S.W. 997 , 18 A.L.R. 433 , and Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. Brown, 176 Ark. 774 , 4 S.W.2d 15 , 58 A.L.R. 534 . … Davis, 242 U.S. 468 , 37 S.Ct. 208 , 61 L.Ed. 441 ; Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U.S. 360 , 39 S.Ct. 512 , 63 L.Ed. 1030 ; Board of Public Utility Commissioners v.

William Whitlock v. FSL Management

843 F.3d 1084 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 2016

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ WILLIAM WHITLOCK; DAVID SKYRM; KRISTIN ┐ MOORE; HOLLY GOODMAN; GARY MUNCY; │ MICHAEL BROWN … Brown v. Tenn. Dep’t of Fin. & Admin., 561 F.3d 542, 546 (6th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted).

Grundy Mining Company v. Douglas W. Flynn and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

353 F.3d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 2004

These included the meaning adopted by the Benefits Review Board in Spese v. … Id. at 998 (quoting Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812, 816 (6th Cir.1993)) (internal quotation omitted).

Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. Hanks

106 F.2d 482 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 1939

Gunning v. Cooley, 281 U.S. 90, 94 , 50 S.Ct. 231 , 74 L.Ed. 720 ; Rochford v. Penna. Co., 6 Cir., 174 F. 81, 83 ; Begert v. Payne, 6 Cir., 274 F. 784 ; Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co. v. … Co. v. Thompson, 6 Cir., 236 F. 1, 3 ; Thompson v. Tenn. R. Co., 6 Cir., 33 F.2d 18, 20 ; Carson v. Dierks, 196 Ark. 163 , 117 S.W.2d 39 ; Arkadelphia Sand & Gravel Co. v. Knight, supra.

Rees v. Olmsted

135 F. 296 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 1905

Board of Commissioners v. Mighels, 7 Ohio St. 109 , 116. In Boalt v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

Shea v. United States

251 F. 440 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 3, 1918

The indictment named several defendants, in addition to plaintiffs in error, including one Collins and one Brown. … Simmons v. United States, 142 U. S. 148, 155 , 12 Sup. Ct. 171, 35 L. Ed. 968 ; Allis v. United States, 155 U. S. 117, 123 , 15 Sup. Ct. 36, 39 L. Ed. 91 ; Young v. Corrigan (C. C. A. 6) 210 Fed. 442 , 127 C. C.

Jerald Thomas v. Unknown Eby

481 F.3d 434 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 30, 2007

Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). … On summary judgment, we analyze the causation element of a retaliation claim under the burden-shifting framework announced in Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Dodez v. United States

154 F.2d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 18, 1946

Sirski v. United States, 1 Cir., 145 F.2d 749 ; United States v. Flakowicz, 2 Cir., 146 F.2d 874 ; United States v. Estep, 3 Cir., 150 F.2d 768 ; Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 148 F.2d 288 ; Koch v. … United States, 4 Cir., 150 F.2d 762 ; Fletcher v. United States, 5 Cir., 129 F.2d 262 ; Klopp v. United States, 6 Cir., 148 F.2d 659 ; United States v. Rinko, 7 Cir., 147 F.2d 1 ; Gibson v.

14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1194, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7509 Anna Marie Hill Allen v. George S. Lovejoy, Director of Memphis and Shelby County Health Department, Shelby County, Tennessee

553 F.2d 522 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 1977

In Barker v. … , and this Court's decision in Whitlow v.

Robert E. Minehart v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.

731 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1984

In like fashion, a railroad employee’s attempt to forego Railway Adjustment Board procedures by filing suit in federal court was rejected in Dorsey v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 476 F.2d 243 (4th Cir.1973). … Nor does Minehart fall within the bounds of a very narrow exception to the preemption doctrine of exclusive jurisdiction in the Railway Adjustment Board indicated by this court in Kaschak v.

Parents Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

120 F.4th 536 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 2024

Board of Education; │ LIBBY WALLICK, in her official capacity as a member │ of the Olentangy Board of Education; LAKESHA WYSE, │ in her official capacity as a member of the Olentangy … No. 23-3630 Parents Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Page 2 Local Sch. Dist.

Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268

895 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1990

See Bell v. … v.

Abner v. Focus: Hope

93 F. App'x 792 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 2004

Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866-67 (6th Cir.2000). A complaint “is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989); Clark v. Nat’l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir.1975).

Roger Payne, III v. Robert Brown, Jr.

961 F.2d 1578 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 1992

Roger PAYNE, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-1531. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 29, 1992. Before DAVID A. … II 10 The district court relied on Cowan v.

Mark B. Landau v. Colonel Arthur Allen

424 F.2d 668 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); see Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 , 75 S.Ct. 392 , 99 L.Ed. 428 (1955); Dickinson v. … Niznik v. United States, 173 F.2d 328, 334 (6th Cir. 1949); see Tyrrell v. United States, 200 F.2d 8, 11 (9th Cir. 1952); Cramer v. France, 148 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1945).

United States v. Sterling Roberts

84 F.4th 659 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 17, 2023

Caldwell was en route to the address that “Brown” had provided him in Jamestown, Ohio when “Brown” texted him a new address for their meeting. Mr. … Caldwell became suspicious, so he asked “Brown” to call him, but “Brown” refused to do so. Mr.

Norman Quincy Wright v. Nevil C. Trammell, Jr. Charles M. Traughber Linda K. Miller Donna Blackburn and Ed Hoover

810 F.2d 589 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 1987

The district court held that due process was not required in connection with a parole board determination of whether or not to grant parole, to a prisoner otherwise lawfully detained. Sharp v. … Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1, 11 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979). This Court held in Mayes v.

Bennett L. Crowder, II v. J.K. Conlan

740 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 1984

In Blum v. … In Hodges v.

Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Helvering

74 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1934

Miller Industries Co. v. … Case), and in its conclusion the Board erred. The Board having made no findings of value as of December 1,1913, it is not for us to say what the value was upon that date. Miller Industries Company v.