Opinion

Parents Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

  • 120 F.4th 536
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Nov 1, 2024
Status
Published
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 55.1%

The opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)

File Name: 24a0247p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

┐

PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION,

│

Plaintiff-Appellant, │

│

v. │ No. 23-3630

>

│

OLENTANGY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF │

EDUCATION; MARK T. RAIFF, in his official capacity as │

Superintendent of Olentangy Local School District; │

PETER STERN, in his official capacity as Olentangy’s │

Assistant Director of Equity and Inclusion; RANDY │

WRIGHT, in his official capacity as Olentangy’s Chief │

of Administrative Services; KEVIN DABERKOW, in his │

official capacity as a member of the Olentangy Board │

of Education; BRANDON LESTER, in his official │

capacity as a member of the Olentangy Board of │

Education; KEVIN O’BRIEN, in his official capacity as │

a member of the Olentangy Board of Education; │

LIBBY WALLICK, in her official capacity as a member │

of the Olentangy Board of Education; LAKESHA WYSE, │

in her official capacity as a member of the Olentangy │

Board of Education, │

Defendants-Appellees. │

┘

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.

No. 2:23-cv-01595—Algenon L. Marbley, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: November 1, 2024

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE,

STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER,

MURPHY, DAVIS, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.

No. 23-3630 Parents Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Page 2

Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

_________________

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC and REPLY: J. Michael Connolly, Cameron

T. Norris, Thomas S. Vaseliou, CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for

Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Bartholomew T. Freeze, Genevieve M. Hoffman, FREUND,

FREEZE & ARNOLD, Columbus, Ohio, Jessica K. Philemond, Sandra R. McIntosh, Mitchell L.

Stith, SCOTT SCRIVEN LLP, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Joseph D. Spate,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, John J. Bursch, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Washington, D.C., Tyson C.

Langhofer, Mathew W. Hoffmann, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Lansdowne,

Virginia, Ilya Shapiro, MANHATTAN INSTITUTE, New York, New York, Kayla A. Toney,

FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C., Adam E. Schulman, HAMILTON

LINCOLN LAW INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C., Brett R. Nolan, INSTITUTE FOR FREE

SPEECH, Washington, D.C., Talmadge Butts, FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW, Gallant,

Alabama, for Amici Curiae.

_________________

ORDER

_________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en

banc of this case. Under Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b), “[a] decision to grant rehearing en banc

vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case

on the docket as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are

vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for

oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.