Case law

Abner v. SBC (Ameritech)

86 F. App'x 958 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 2004

Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). A complaint “is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. … Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 , 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); see also Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196, 1198 (6th Cir.1990).

NLRB v. Metro Man IV, LLC

113 F.4th 692 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 2024

Our “review of the Board’s decision is quite limited.” Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC v. NLRB, 41 F.4th 518, 523 (6th Cir. 2022) (quoting Caterpillar Logistics, Inc. v. NLRB, 835 F.3d 536, 542 (6th Cir. 2016)). … Still, we will not “‘rubber-stamp’ Board decisions that controvert the NLRA,” and must “carefully scrutinize accusations that the Board failed to abide by precedent.” Kellogg Co. v.

Hussam F. v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

897 F.3d 707 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 27, 2018

But under Pula , the Board's analysis may not begin and end with his failure to follow proper immigration procedures. See Zuh v. … Hanna v. Holder , 740 F.3d 379 , 386 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting Maharaj v. Gonzales , 450 F.3d 961 , 967 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc) ). On appeal, the Government does not defend the Board's conclusion.

Davis v. United States

589 F.3d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 2009

White, 319 F.3d 560 (3d Cir.2003); Soble v. Army Bd. of Corr. of Military Records, 151 F.3d 1033 (7th Cir.1998); Smith v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 510, 512 (10th Cir.1986); Geyen v. … Sept. 25, 1998) (holding action to modify records does not accrue until final board decision) with McDonald v. Resor, 34 F.3d 1068 (6th Cir.1994) (accrual date is date of discharge) and Gibbs v.

Amadou Lamine Sarr v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General

485 F.3d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 2007

See Liti v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 631, 638 (6th Cir.2005) (quoting Secaida-Rosales v. … “The Board’s denial of a motion to remand is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 627, 634 (6th Cir.2006).

Jeffrey L. Napier v. Madison County, Kentucky Ron Devere, Jailer, Individual and Official Capacity David O'daniel, Deputy Jailer, Individual and Official Capacity

238 F.3d 739 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 4, 2001

See Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir. 2000). 11 The objective component requires an inmate to show that the alleged deprivation is "sufficiently serious." … Brown, 207 F.3d at 867 (citing and quoting Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994)) Accordingly, we follow the approach taken by the First, Third and Eleventh Circuits.

Babler v. Futhey

618 F.3d 514 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 2010

Finnegan v. Leu, 456 U.S. 431, 435 (1982). … Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir. 1971).

Bossier Bank & Trust Co. v. Union Planters National Bank

550 F.2d 1077 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1977

/s/ BAILEY BROWN CHIEF JUDGE APPENDIX B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION No. C-75-101 BOSSIER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, A Louisiana Corporation, Plaintiff, v. … /s/ AARON BROWN, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE .

National Labor Relations Board v. Harbin Construction, Inc.

76 F.3d 379 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 1, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HARBIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Respondent. No. 95-6598. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 1, 1996. Before: KEITH, JONES, and SILER, Circuit Judges. … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Mining Corporation

66 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 1995

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SANDS MINING CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 95-5962. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 15, 1995. Before: CONTIE, NELSON, and RYAN, Circuit Judges. … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

Bobbie M. Smith v. Tipton Cty. Bd. of Educ.

916 F.3d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 2019

During the 2016 tax year, an employee of the Tipton County Board of Education (“Board”) disclosed the Board employees’ W-2 tax  No. 18-5426 Smith, et al. v. Tipton Cty. … Thus, if the Board administers a SNAP benefit program, then Smith and other Board employees could sue for the negligent disclosure of their employee W-2 information.  No. 18-5426 Smith, et al. v.

Bobby Watts, M.D. v. John H. Burkhart, M.D., Howard R. Foreman, M.D., Alvin J. Ingram, M.D., I. Lee Arnold, M.D., and Duane C. Budd, M.D.

978 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 28, 1992

The district court dismissed the action against the defendant board members pursuant to Parratt v. … The board’s act in coercing surrender of the DEA certificate was not without precedent, See, for example, Vakas v.

Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.

794 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 1986

The contract case which fell within rule four was Guardian Depositors Corp. v. Brown, 290 Mich. 433 , 287 N.W. 798 (1939). … This rule was laid down in Hughes v. Judges’ Retirement Board, 407 Mich. 75 , 282 N.W.2d 160 (1979), where plaintiff sought increased retirement benefits under a statute enacted after he retired.

United States v. Salvatore T. "Sam" Busacca

936 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1991

See, e.g., Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Firstenergy Generation, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

929 F.3d 321 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 2, 2019

FirstEnergy Generation, LLC v. … NLRB v. Plymouth Stamping Div.

Riat Danko, Widow of Joseph Danko v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

846 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 12, 1988

See Hon v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 699 F.2d 441 , 443 n. 1 (8th Cir.1983). … Hardesty v. Benefits Review Board, 783 F.2d 138, 139 (8th Cir.1986) (per curiam); Bernardo v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 772 F.2d 576 (9th Cir.1985); Slatick v.

Pyro Mining Co. v. Slaton

879 F.2d 187 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1989

As we further find that the Board erred in Pyro Mining Co. v. Slaton and Warner Coal Co. v. … Slaton and Saylor are accordingly remanded to the Board for a consideration of the merits of the claimants’ appeals. Apache Mining Co. v.

Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor v. Local Union 20, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of Commerce

611 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 1979

In Wirtz v. … In United States v.

United States v. Erie R.

172 F. 50 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1909

Justice Brown, in The Albert Dumois, 177 U. S. 240, 249 , 20 Sup. Ct. 595, 599, 44 L. … Justice Brown said (page 253 of 177 U. S:; and page 600 of 20 Sup. Ct.. [44 D.

Harvey Ray Cochran v. Willard Norvell, Warden, Etc.

446 F.2d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 13, 1971

Brown, who was one of two co-counsel for Appellant at his original trial — testified. The testimony of Mr. Brown is particularly damaging to most of the claimed constitutional infringements made by the Appellant. … Brown’s testimony in reaching its findings of fact.