Case law

Pak v. Reno

196 F.3d 666 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1999

Accardi v. … See INS v.

Morehead Marine Services, Inc. v. Washnock

135 F.3d 366 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 29, 1998

See id.; Brown v. ITT/Continental Baking Co., 921 F.2d 289, 293 (D.C.Cir.1990). As this court stated in Consolidation Coal Co. v. … General Dynamics Corp., 982 F.2d 790, 793, 796-97 (2nd Cir.1992) (applying cautious employer test and upholding board's decision granting § 8(f) relief in back injury case); Lockheed Shipbuilding v.

United States v. John D. Rogers

118 F.3d 466 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 2, 1997

United States v. Brown, 959 F.2d 63, 66 (6th Cir.1992). … Brown, 959 F.2d at 66 .

United States v. Andrew Renfro

620 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1980

In Elkins v. … See also, United States v. Houle, 603 F.2d 1297 (8th Cir. 1979); United States v. Reed, 572 F.2d 412 (2nd Cir.), cert, denied, sub nom., Goldsmith v.

Kurz-Kasch, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers of America, Intervenor

865 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1989

The Board’s factual determinations are conclusive if, upon the entire record, they are supported by substantial evidence. 29 U.S. C. § 160(e) (section 10(e)); Universal Camera Corp. v. … It is well within the Board’s discretion to reopen the record for introduction of more evi¡-dence that would settle the question. 29 C.F.R. § 102.48 (b); Metal Blast, Inc. v.

United States v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

133 F.2d 990 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1943

Haffenreffer Brewing Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1 Cir., 116 F.2d 465 ; United States v. South Georgia Ry. Co., supra; Brown-Rogers-Dixson Co. v. … Under these circumstances, the Board held that the so-called preferred stock represented an indebtedness and the “dividends” paid thereon were interest payments. Kentucky River Coal Corp. v.

Shively v. Green Local School District Board of Education

579 F. App'x 348 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 27, 2014

The eight-count Amended Complaint ([PID 119]) seeks declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against the Green Local School District Board of Education (also “Board of Education” or “Defendant Board”), Michael Nutter, … Count VI alleges that Defendant Board’s failure to train its employees regarding bullying constitutes a violation of the Board’s obligations, resulting in liability pursuant to Monell v. Dep’t of Soc.

National Labor Relations Board, (81-1436), (81-1474) v. Holland American Wafer Company, (81-1436), (81-1474)

683 F.2d 135 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 1982

On appeal, the Board properly contends that determining whether campaign misrepresentations are substantial enough to warrant setting aside an election is within the Board’s discretion. See NLRB v. Allen Mfg. … “Therefore, *138 not every inaccuracy in election campaign propaganda requires the Board to intervene and set aside an election.” Follett Corp. v. NLRB, 397 F.2d 91 , 95 (7th Cir. 1968).

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union 519, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

843 F.2d 1392 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 19, 1988

843 F.2d 1392 National Labor Relations Board v.

Anderson v. Mills

664 F.2d 600 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 20, 1981

See Board of Election Commissioners of Chicago v. Libertarian Party of Illinois, 591 F.2d 22 (CA 7 1979). See Lyons v. Davoren, 402 F.2d 890 (CA 1 1968); Cross Fong Eu, 430 F.Supp. 1036 (DC Cal 1977). … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 at 731 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, at 1279-80 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). However, the State must demonstrate it has acted in this manner to serve some fundamental state interest. Bullock v.

United States v. Burnis Bryant, United States of America v. Henry Church Bryant

461 F.2d 912 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 14, 1972

United States v. … See Morissette v. United States, supra; United States v. Bryant, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 124 , 420 F.2d 1327, 1333 (1969); Bradley v. United States, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 339 , 420 F.2d 181, 188 (1969); Findley v.

Blankenship v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 2005

Brown, CAPITAL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Columbus, Ohio, Michael P. Cassidy, CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, Independence, Ohio, for Appellants. … Blankenship v. Blackwell, 817 N.E.2d 382, 385 (Ohio 2004). Appellants’ mandamus action challenged only the 8,009 signatures that had been invalidated by the local election boards prior to the protest action. Id. at 386.

Conway v. Surles

474 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 1973

Oestereich v. … Fein v. Selective Service Board. No. 7, 405 U.S. 365 , 92 S.Ct. 1062 , 31 L.Ed.2d 298 (1972) 4 Army Regulation: No. 601-54, Processing and Commissioning of Medical Specialist Registrants. Ch. 1, 1-1. Purpose.

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights v. Regents of the University of Michigan

652 F.3d 607 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 9, 2011

Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … The District was under no obligation to adopt this plan: Following Brown v.

State of Ohio Ex Rel. William J. Brown, Attorney General of the State of Ohio v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the Army

497 F.2d 1235 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 6, 1974

In Lathan v. … E. g., Environmental Defense Fund v. Froehlke, supra, Scherr v. Volpe, 466 F.2d 1027 (7th Cir. 1972).

Jim Shelton, William Shrewsbury, Michael Borders and George D. Zamias v. John O. Marsh, Ernest J. Harrell and Robert D. Brown III

902 F.2d 1201 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 1990

Steel Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 595 F.2d 207, 215 (5th Cir.1979) (quoting Braniff Airways v. CAB, 379 F.2d 453 (D.C.Cir.1967)). … Appellants’ citation to Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 674 F.Supp. 405 (N.D.N.Y.1987), aff’d sub nom. Bersani v.

Myers v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

20 F. App'x 301 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 2001

This court must affirm the Board’s decision if the Board has not committed any legal error or exceeded its scope of review of the ALJ’s determination. Glen Coal Co. v. Seals, 147 F.3d 502, 510 (6th Cir.1998). … See, e.g., Gray, 176 F.3d at 388 ; Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812 , 816 (6th Cir.1993); Phillips v. Director, OWCP, 768 F.2d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 1985); Director, OWCP v.

Oak Grove Const. Co. v. Jefferson County

219 F. 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 1915

Shoecraft v. Bloxham, 124 U. S. 730, 735 , 8 Sup. Ct. 686, 31 L. Ed. 574 ; Kolze v. Hoadley, 200 U. S. 76, 82 , 26 Sup. Ct. 220, 50 L. Ed. 377 . And see Brown v. Fletcher, 235 U. S. 589 , 35 Sup. Ct. 154, 58 L. … Nor do we think that notice and acquiescence must be to or by the full board of commissioners in formal meeting assembled.

Brown v. City of Louisville

33 F.3d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 23, 1994

Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 639 (1987); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 814 (1982); Jackson v. Hoylman, 933 F.2d 401, 402 (6th Cir.1991); Brandenburg v. Cureton, 882 F.2d 211, 215 (6th Cir.1989). … Wegener v.

Elisha Shaya v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 2009

Brown v. McKee, No. 07-2223, 2009 WL 2031861, at *4 (6th Cir. July 15, 2009). … But the result of that obscurity is that the Board gets to choose among those plausible interpretations. See Khalili v.