Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union 519, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

  • 843 F.2d 1392
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7090
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Jan 19, 1988
Status
Published
Cited by
38 cases
Authority
More cited than 95.4%

plaintiff stated claim against appraiser under Ohio law despite the fact that plaintiff entered into sales contract before he applied for the loan and despite the fact that the appraiser’s report stated that it was confidential and solely for lender’s use

How later courts described this case

  • plaintiff stated claim against appraiser under Ohio law despite the fact that plaintiff entered into sales contract before he applied for the loan and despite the fact that the appraiser’s report stated that it was confidential and solely for lender’s use
  • “We believe it is clear that the term ‘region’ is flexible . . . .”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

843 F.2d 1392

National Labor Relations Board

v.

Teamsters Local Union #519, International Brotherhood of

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

NO. 87-6209

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

JAN 19, 1988

1

Appeal From: N.L.R.B.

2

ORDER ENFORCED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.