Case law

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Lansing Branch v. Lansing Board of Education, a Body Corporate

485 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1973

See, Keyes v. School District #1, 413 U.S. 189 , 93 S.Ct. 2686 , 37 L.Ed.2d 548 (1973); Bradley v. Milliken, 484 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1973) (in banc); Mapp v. … Kelly v. Metropolitan Board of Education of Nashville, 463 F.2d 732 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1001 , 93 S.Ct. 322 , 34 L.Ed.2d 262 (1972); Oliver v.

Buser v. Novelty Tufting Machine Co.

151 F. 478 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1907

Appellee’s counsel cite the cases of Cahoon v. Ring, Fed. Cas. No. 2,292, Hall v. Bird, Fed. Cas. No. 5,926, Hartshorn v. Tripp, Fed. Cas. No. 6,168, and Davis v. Brown (C. … Justice Grier, who was one of the majority in G/Vier v Wilder, in the case of Rich v.

June Kunz v. United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 876

5 F.3d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 29, 1993

McTighe v. … Wooddell v.

Lake Odessa MacHine Products, Inc., a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Sparton Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

512 F.2d 762 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 23, 1975

In Allied Electric Products, 34 LRRM 1538, the Board said: “The Board is necessarily concerned with the protection of its procedures designed to provide fair elections. … See, to the same effect, N.L.R.B. v. John S. Barnes Corporation, 478 F.2d 1105 (1973) (C.A. 7); Thiokol Chemical Corporation, 82 LRRM 1583 (1973); Dubie-Clark Company, 209 N.L.R.B. No. 21 (1974).

Robert Baar v. Jefferson County Board of Educ

311 F. App'x 817 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 18, 2009

To prevail, Baar must show that (1) he had a cognizable property interest, (2) the school board infringed that interest and (3) the school board did not give him the process he was due. See Gunasekera v. … To obtain relief, Baar must show that (1) the school board made stigmatizing statements about him in connection with a change in his employment status, Quinn v.

North Bank, a Michigan Corporation v. The Cincinnati Insurance Companies

125 F.3d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 1, 1997

Co. v. Brown, 782 F.Supp. 110 (M.D.Ga.1992) (malicious prosecution, false arrest, and assault and battery). … But the Shellenbarger complaint does not allege, and there is no evidence, that the Board knew about any intentional discrimination.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kentucky State Police Department

80 F.3d 1086 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1996

The EEOC had relied on the Kentucky Retirement Board (the “Board”) for the names of potential claimants. … Rasimas v.

Gregory v. Hunt

24 F.3d 781 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 18, 1994

Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 251-52, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2511 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)). … In Pratt v. Brown Machine Co., 855 F.2d 1225 (6th Cir.1988), the plaintiff brought a wrongful discharge claim against his former employer.

Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Tattooed Millionaire Ent.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 25, 2025

Brown.  Nos. 24-5452/5453 Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. … Bank v.

United States v. Andrew Renfro

620 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1980

In Elkins v. … See also, United States v. Houle, 603 F.2d 1297 (8th Cir. 1979); United States v. Reed, 572 F.2d 412 (2nd Cir.), cert, denied, sub nom., Goldsmith v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

865 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 10, 1989

particularly Scofield v. … We have relied on Pattern Makers' as establishing the high degree of deference due the Board's interpretation of the Act. Vokas Provision Co. v. N.L.R.B., 796 F.2d 864, 868 (6th Cir.1986); N.L.R.B. v.

Oak Grove Const. Co. v. Jefferson County

219 F. 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 1915

Shoecraft v. Bloxham, 124 U. S. 730, 735 , 8 Sup. Ct. 686, 31 L. Ed. 574 ; Kolze v. Hoadley, 200 U. S. 76, 82 , 26 Sup. Ct. 220, 50 L. Ed. 377 . And see Brown v. Fletcher, 235 U. S. 589 , 35 Sup. Ct. 154, 58 L. … Nor do we think that notice and acquiescence must be to or by the full board of commissioners in formal meeting assembled.

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union 519, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

843 F.2d 1392 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 19, 1988

843 F.2d 1392 National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Cleon Brown

70 F.3d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 1995

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cleon BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-4311. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 9, 1995. … See United States v.

Anthony McClendon El v. Heidi Washington

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 21, 2025

So Michigan’s parole board has repeatedly denied him parole. … See Wershe v. Combs, 763 F.3d 500, 506 (6th Cir. 2014); Crump v. Lafler, 657 F.3d 393, 404 (6th Cir. 2011); Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164–65 (6th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

Reed v. Rhodes

691 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 20, 1982

Reed v. Cleveland Board of Education, 607 F.2d 737 (6 Cir. 1979). … The court referred specifically to this court’s decision in Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (1979).

Carrington South Health Care Center, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

76 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 1996

“In reviewing whether the Board properly denied a hearing to the objecting party, the court must determine whether the Board acted arbitrarily in exercising its discretion.” NLRB v. … Similarly, in NLRB v.

Ruth Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools Chippewa Valley School Board of Education George Depillo Thomas Scullen and Edward Skowneski

825 F.2d 1004 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1987

The board’s liability under Title VII, however, can be based on the theory of respondeat superior. See Meritor Savings Bank v. … Lincoln v. Board of Regents, 697 F.2d 928, 934 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 826 , 104 S.Ct. 97 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983). Accord Garza v. City of Omaha, 814 F.2d 553, 557 (8th Cir.1987); King v.

United States v. Goddard

638 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 10, 2011

See United States v. … United States v.

In Re William Lee Kovacs, Dba B & W Enterprises State of Ohio, Ex Rel., William J. Brown, Attorney General v. William Lee Kovacs

717 F.2d 984 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 22, 1983

NLRB v. Evans Plumbing Co., 639 F.2d 291 (5th Cir.1981) (enforcement proceeding by NLRB).