Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

5.21s

  • Pioneer S. S. Co. v. McCann

    170 F. 873 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1909

    with them on board of the vessel at the time and place in question. … As it seems to us, the facts found by Judge Brown ([D. C.] 24 Red. 860) are in several important respects similar to the present facts.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Edgar Spring, Inc. D/B/A Spring Industries and Tri-State Asphalt Corporation

    800 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 1986

    See also NLRB v. Heck’s, Inc., 369 F.2d 370, 371 (6th Cir.1966) (“[Cjompliance with [an] order [of the Board] is no defense against the entry of a decree of enforcement.”). … See NLRB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gerald L. Minsky

    963 F.2d 870 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 1992

    .”); Haller v. … United States v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Fox Painting Company and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., and v. National Labor Relations Board, and Cross-Applicant

    919 F.2d 53 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 1990

    International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers v. NLRB, 843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Deklewa v. NLRB, 488 U.S. 889 , 109 S.Ct. 222 , 102 L.Ed.2d 213 (1988). … Adair Standish Corp. v. NLRB, 912 F.2d 854, 866 (6th Cir.1990).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Deborah A. Northcross v. The Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, and City of Memphiset Al., Deborah A. Northcross v. The Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools

    489 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1973

    NORTHCROSS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the MEMPHIS CITY SCHOOLS et al., and City of Memphiset al., Defendants-Appellees. Deborah A. NORTHCROSS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … In Goss v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. International Credit Service, a Division of Lucas County Credit Bureau, Inc.

    651 F.2d 1172 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1981

    The existence of an agreement is a question of fact, and it is the Board’s *1174 function to determine whether the employer refuses to sign and honor the bargain produced by the negotiations. N.L.R.B. v. … We should enforce the Board’s order if we find substantial evidence supports the finding that an agreement was reached. Adams Potato Chips, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 430 F.2d 90 (6th Cir. 1970).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

    655 F.3d 556 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 2011

    Brown, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellants. Jeffrey H. Gibson, Philip N. … Perry was not a member of the Disciplinary Hearing Board, and the Code of Conduct provides that non-members cannot attend the Board’s deliberations.

    Cited 372 timesPublished
  • Lorillard Tobacco Co v. Chester Willcox

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 2008

    Eubanks v. CBSK Fin. Group, Inc., 385 F.3d 894, 897 (6th Cir. 2004); Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 775 (6th Cir. 2002). … Teledyne Indus., Inc. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Board, 911 F.2d 1214, 1217-18 (6th Cir. 1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lapeer County, Michigan, a Municipal Corporation v. Montgomery County, Ohio, a Municipal Corporation Montgomery County Sheriff's Department

    108 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1997

    See County of Monroe v. … See EEOC v. Brown & Root, Inc., 688 F.2d 338 (5th Cir.1982) (movant failed to demonstrate adverse effect of failure to join party).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Associated Truck Lines, Inc.

    801 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1986

    at issue from that which is based on the primary jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board." … Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders, 468 U.S. , at 502, 104 S.Ct. [3179], at 3186 [ 82 L.Ed.2d 373 ].

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sara Koncz, a Sole Proprietor D/B/A Clio Convalescent Center

    653 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 1980

    ORDER This matter is before the court upon application by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its decision and order reported at 236 NLRB 1387 (1978). … Accordingly, The order of the Board is enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Michigan Drywall Corporation, M & D Drywall, Inc., and James F. Mullins

    616 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 11, 1980

    The Board found correctly that M & D Drywall, Inc. was the agent of James Mullins and Michigan Drywall and that Mullins was the real employer and alter ego of Michigan Drywall and M & D Drywall. … Accordingly, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Levine v. Fry Foods, Inc.

    596 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1979

    By its own terms, the § 10(j) injunction expired upon “the final disposition of the matters involved before the National Labor Relations Board.” … The Board’s order is reviewable either in an enforcement proceeding under § 10(e) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), or in an appeal by the Employer under § 10(f), 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f) (1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • White Oak Property Development, LLC v. Washington Township

    606 F.3d 842 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2010

    On June 25, 2007, the Trustees voted to pass Resolution 13-2007, which asks the Brown County Commissioners to vacate Shroufe Road at the 1,438 mark. … The Brown County Commissioners subsequently denied the request. On July 23, 2007, the Trustees voted to rescind the TIF Agreement.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Vasquez v. Jones

    496 F.3d 564 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 2007

    Hamilton v. Morgan, 474 F.3d 854, 857-58 (6th Cir.2007) (citing Brumley v. Wingard, 269 F.3d 629, 637-38 (6th Cir.2001)). A. Admissibility of the Demond Brown Transcript Under Ohio v. … Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 (1941); Brown v. Marshall, 704 F.2d 333, 334 (6th Cir.1983) (per curiam).

    Cited 118 timesPublished
  • Truitt v. County of Wayne

    148 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 1998

    See, e.g., Williams-Guice v. Board of Educ., 45 F.3d 161, 165 (7th Cir.1995); Jarrett v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 22 F.3d 256, 259-60 (10th Cir.1994); Hill v. … See Rivers v.

    Cited 144 timesPublished
  • Milan Chonich Carmen Pascaretti v. Wayne County Community College Juanita C. Ford

    973 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1992

    Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1311 (6th Cir.1989). … See EEOC v. Board of Trustees of Wayne County Community College, 723 F.2d 509 (6th Cir.1983). 10 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Mansfield Apartment Owners Association v. City of Mansfield

    988 F.2d 1469 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1993

    Finally, because we find that the District Court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants was proper, we find it unnecessary to address the statute of limitations issue, However, we would note that in Browning v. … of limitations (O.R.C. § 2305.09(D)) applies, and reaffirmed Browning .

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Joseph Paskvan v. City of Cleveland Civil Service Commission Mitchel J. Brown Howard E. Rudolph and George v. Voinovich, Mayor, City of Cleveland

    946 F.2d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1991

    Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2699-2700 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Walker v. … Hughes, 558 F.2d 1247, 1253 (6th Cir.1977); Wells v. Board of Regents, 545 F.2d 15 (6th Cir.1976); Christian v. Belcher, 888 F.2d 410 (6th Cir.1989).

    Cited 243 timesPublished
  • Patricia A. Johnson v. Theodore C. Granholm, Michael F. Lund, David F. Tibbetts & Montmorency County Board of Commissioners

    662 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1981

    Even if the county board of commissioners was the employer of the individual defendants (a matter in dispute) the board would not be liable in damages for their actions in the absence of a showing that the acts complained … Denman v. Leedy, 479 F.2d 1097 (6th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.