Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.21s
170 F. 873 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1909
with them on board of the vessel at the time and place in question. … As it seems to us, the facts found by Judge Brown ([D. C.] 24 Red. 860) are in several important respects similar to the present facts.
Cited 22 timesPublished800 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 1986
See also NLRB v. Heck’s, Inc., 369 F.2d 370, 371 (6th Cir.1966) (“[Cjompliance with [an] order [of the Board] is no defense against the entry of a decree of enforcement.”). … See NLRB v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States v. Gerald L. Minsky
963 F.2d 870 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 1992
.”); Haller v. … United States v.
Cited 46 timesPublished919 F.2d 53 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 1990
International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers v. NLRB, 843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Deklewa v. NLRB, 488 U.S. 889 , 109 S.Ct. 222 , 102 L.Ed.2d 213 (1988). … Adair Standish Corp. v. NLRB, 912 F.2d 854, 866 (6th Cir.1990).
Cited 9 timesPublished489 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1973
NORTHCROSS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the MEMPHIS CITY SCHOOLS et al., and City of Memphiset al., Defendants-Appellees. Deborah A. NORTHCROSS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … In Goss v.
Cited 2 timesPublished651 F.2d 1172 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1981
The existence of an agreement is a question of fact, and it is the Board’s *1174 function to determine whether the employer refuses to sign and honor the bargain produced by the negotiations. N.L.R.B. v. … We should enforce the Board’s order if we find substantial evidence supports the finding that an agreement was reached. Adams Potato Chips, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 430 F.2d 90 (6th Cir. 1970).
Cited 3 timesPublishedHeyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
655 F.3d 556 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 2011
Brown, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellants. Jeffrey H. Gibson, Philip N. … Perry was not a member of the Disciplinary Hearing Board, and the Code of Conduct provides that non-members cannot attend the Board’s deliberations.
Cited 372 timesPublishedLorillard Tobacco Co v. Chester Willcox
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 2008
Eubanks v. CBSK Fin. Group, Inc., 385 F.3d 894, 897 (6th Cir. 2004); Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 775 (6th Cir. 2002). … Teledyne Indus., Inc. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Board, 911 F.2d 1214, 1217-18 (6th Cir. 1990).
Cited 0 timesPublished108 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1997
See County of Monroe v. … See EEOC v. Brown & Root, Inc., 688 F.2d 338 (5th Cir.1982) (movant failed to demonstrate adverse effect of failure to join party).
Cited 6 timesPublishedMartin v. Associated Truck Lines, Inc.
801 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1986
at issue from that which is based on the primary jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board." … Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders, 468 U.S. , at 502, 104 S.Ct. [3179], at 3186 [ 82 L.Ed.2d 373 ].
Cited 28 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Sara Koncz, a Sole Proprietor D/B/A Clio Convalescent Center
653 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 1980
ORDER This matter is before the court upon application by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its decision and order reported at 236 NLRB 1387 (1978). … Accordingly, The order of the Board is enforced.
Cited 0 timesPublished616 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 11, 1980
The Board found correctly that M & D Drywall, Inc. was the agent of James Mullins and Michigan Drywall and that Mullins was the real employer and alter ego of Michigan Drywall and M & D Drywall. … Accordingly, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.
Cited 0 timesPublished596 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1979
By its own terms, the § 10(j) injunction expired upon “the final disposition of the matters involved before the National Labor Relations Board.” … The Board’s order is reviewable either in an enforcement proceeding under § 10(e) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), or in an appeal by the Employer under § 10(f), 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f) (1976).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWhite Oak Property Development, LLC v. Washington Township
606 F.3d 842 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2010
On June 25, 2007, the Trustees voted to pass Resolution 13-2007, which asks the Brown County Commissioners to vacate Shroufe Road at the 1,438 mark. … The Brown County Commissioners subsequently denied the request. On July 23, 2007, the Trustees voted to rescind the TIF Agreement.
Cited 51 timesPublished496 F.3d 564 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 2007
Hamilton v. Morgan, 474 F.3d 854, 857-58 (6th Cir.2007) (citing Brumley v. Wingard, 269 F.3d 629, 637-38 (6th Cir.2001)). A. Admissibility of the Demond Brown Transcript Under Ohio v. … Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 (1941); Brown v. Marshall, 704 F.2d 333, 334 (6th Cir.1983) (per curiam).
Cited 118 timesPublished148 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 1998
See, e.g., Williams-Guice v. Board of Educ., 45 F.3d 161, 165 (7th Cir.1995); Jarrett v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 22 F.3d 256, 259-60 (10th Cir.1994); Hill v. … See Rivers v.
Cited 144 timesPublishedMilan Chonich Carmen Pascaretti v. Wayne County Community College Juanita C. Ford
973 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1992
Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1311 (6th Cir.1989). … See EEOC v. Board of Trustees of Wayne County Community College, 723 F.2d 509 (6th Cir.1983). 10 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedMansfield Apartment Owners Association v. City of Mansfield
988 F.2d 1469 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1993
Finally, because we find that the District Court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants was proper, we find it unnecessary to address the statute of limitations issue, However, we would note that in Browning v. … of limitations (O.R.C. § 2305.09(D)) applies, and reaffirmed Browning .
Cited 70 timesPublished946 F.2d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1991
Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2699-2700 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Walker v. … Hughes, 558 F.2d 1247, 1253 (6th Cir.1977); Wells v. Board of Regents, 545 F.2d 15 (6th Cir.1976); Christian v. Belcher, 888 F.2d 410 (6th Cir.1989).
Cited 243 timesPublished662 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1981
Even if the county board of commissioners was the employer of the individual defendants (a matter in dispute) the board would not be liable in damages for their actions in the absence of a showing that the acts complained … Denman v. Leedy, 479 F.2d 1097 (6th Cir. 1973).
Cited 29 timesPublished
Ask Donna