Case law

Local Union No. 5741, United Mine Workers of America, Cross v. National Labor Relations Board

865 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1989

Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 215-16 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 405-06 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964), and a reviewing court must give special respect to the remedies chosen by the Board. NLRB v. … v.

Springs v. United States Department of Treasury

567 F. App'x 438 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2014

See Curtis v. … To substantiate that argument, she cites Heike v. Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, No. 10-11373, 2011 WL 2602004 (E.D.Mich. July 1, 2011). Her reliance on Heike is misplaced.

Johnnie York v. Benefits Review Board Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs United States Department of Labor

819 F.2d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 18, 1987

Orange v. Island Creek Coal Co., 786 F.2d 724, 725 (6th Cir.1986); Director v. Rowe, 710 F.2d 251, 254 (6th Cir.1983). … See Kertesz, 788 F.2d 158 ; Moseley v. Peabody Coal Co., 769 F.2d 357 (6th Cir.1985); Ramey, 755 F.2d 485 ; Gibas v.

Border v. Trumbull County Board of Commissioners

414 F. App'x 831 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 2011

) COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ) DISTRICT OF OHIO TRUMBULL COUNTY BOARD OF ) COMMISSIONERS … See Preyor v. City of Ferndale, 248 F.

Miller v. Meyer

644 F. App'x 506 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 2016

In April 2010, a Brown County grand jury indicted each [plaintiff] on one count of obstructing justice and one count of complicity in obstructing justice, each a fifth-degree felony. State v. … Id.; see also Board of Trustees v. Moore, 800 F.3d 214, 223 (6th Cir.2015). B. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Rogers v. O’Donnell, 737 F.3d 1026, 1030 (6th Cir.2013).

El Cajon Portland Cement Co. v. Robert F. Wentz Engineering Co.

165 F. 619 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 23, 1908

, otherwise than as it stockholder, except the election of officers, or be present at the board meeting while the same is being considered. … Brown v. Grand Rapids Furniture Co., 58 Fed. 286 , 7 C. C. A. 225, 22 L. R. A. 817, and cases therein cited.

Berger v. Medina County Ohio Board

295 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 2008

) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MEDINA COUNTY OHIO BOARD OF ) NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JOHN … Berger brought an employment discrimination action against the Medina County Ohio Board of County Commissioners and against John Shultz.

Lankford v. Eastover Coal Co.

20 F. App'x 288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 2001

This court must affirm the Board’s decision if the Board has not committed any legal error or exceeded its scope of review of the ALJ’s determination. Glen Coal Co. v. Seals, 147 F.3d 502, 510 (6th Cir.1998). … See, e.g., Gray, 176 F.3d at 388 ; *292 Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812 , 816 (6th Cir.1993); Phillips v. Director, OWCP, 768 F.2d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 1985); Director, OWCP v.

Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.

532 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 24, 1976

City of Delray Beach, 493 F.2d 799, 801 (5th Cir. 1974) (county area planning board); Lehman v. City of Pittsburgh, 474 F.2d 21 (3rd Cir. 1973) (city civil service commission); Puckett v. … But see Gomez v. Wilson, 477 F.2d 411 , 420-421 n. 56 (D.C.Cir. 1973); Brown v. Board of Educ., 386 F.Supp. 110 (N.D.Ill.1974).

Glover v. Johnson

934 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 30, 1991

In Peppers v. … Northcross v. Board of Educ. of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624, 637 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 3000, 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980).

National Labor Relations Board v. Downtown Bakery Corp. And Bakery and Confectionery Workers, International Union, Local 19

330 F.2d 921 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1964

B. v. … In its brief, the Board cites Brooks v. N. L. R.

United States v. United Technologies Corp.

626 F.3d 313 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 2010

The government thus did not litigate Count III before the Board, leaving us to decide whether Count III, like Counts IV and V, could have been litigated before the Board, not whether it was. … Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the government should have brought its common law claims before the Board. See Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 772–73 (6th Cir. 2002).

Venus Springs v. Mayer Brown, Limited Liability

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2014

-2- No. 13-1521 Springs v. U.S. Dep’t of Treasury Carolina state court against Mayer Brown and one of its partners. … To substantiate that argument, she cites Heike v. Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, No. 10-11373, 2011 WL 2602004 (E.D. Mich. July 1, 2011). Her reliance on Heike is misplaced.

Watts v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

701 F.3d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 12, 2012

After the requisite BWC board proceedings, UPS terminated Watts’s TTD payments on November 27, 2002. … See Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 664 (7th Cir. 2001) (enforcing arbitration under the RLA); Schiltz v. Burlington N. R.R., 115 F.3d 1407, 1415 (8th Cir. 1997) (same); Crayton v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 141 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n

425 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 5, 1970

The Board found that in the Cincinnati area contractors historically have not fabricated round pipe except in unusual situations and that they do not fabricate flexible elbows. … We are of the opinion that the Board’s rulings of law are correct and that its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Enforcement of the order is granted.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,049 Arthur W. Brown, Receiver of Prudential Building and Loan Association v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

513 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1975

In Tcherepnin v. … In Parden v. Terminal R.

Memphis & C. R. v. Hoechner

67 F. 456 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 1895

There was, therefore, nothing in the case making applicable the doctrine of Railroad Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445 -450, or Railroad Co. v. Jones, 155 U. S. 354 , 15 Sup. Ct. 136. … Railroad Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445 -450; Railroad v. Jones, 155 U. S. 354 , 15 Sup. Ct. 136; Railway Co. v. Johnson, 76 Tex. 421 , 13 S. W. 463 .

Melvin Welch v. Benefits Review Board Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

808 F.2d 443 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 4, 1986

What this means, in effect, is that the standards of review for the Benefits Review Board and this Court are the same. See Ramey v. Kentland Elkhorn Coal Corp., 755 F.2d 485 (6th Cir.1985). … Peabody Coal Co. v. Lowis, 708 F.2d 266, 274 (7th Cir.1983); Underhill v. Peabody Coal Co., 687 F.2d 217, 223 (7th Cir.1982); see Ansel v. Weinberger, 529 F.2d 304 (6th Cir.1976).

Michigan Southern Railroad Company v. Branch & St. Joseph Counties Rail Users Association, Inc.

287 F.3d 568 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 24, 2002

Kneas, Kneas & Brown, Portage, MI, Daniel A. LaKemper (argued and briefed), Peoria, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. 2 Charles R. … Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State Univ., 123 F.3d 404, 408 (6th Cir.1997). We review for clear error any factual findings the district court made in deciding the motion to dismiss. See Gafford v. General Elec.

Baker Hughes Inc. v. S&S Chemical, LLC

836 F.3d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 2, 2016

Brown v. Bivings, 277 P.2d 671, 673 (Okla. 1954); see also Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 104 (providing that a contract is void if its terms are “so vaguely expressed as to be wholly unascertainable”). … Co. v.