Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.36s
National Labor Relations Board, Applicant-Appellee v. C. E. Strickland and Billy Sturdivant
321 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 13, 1963
In so ruling, reliance was placed upon Lewis v. N.L.R.B., 357 U.S. 10 , 14—16, 78 S.Ct. 1029 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1103 ; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. N.L.R.B., 122 F.2d 450 , C.A. 6th; N.L.R.B. v. … In United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLitton Microwave Cooking Products Division, Litton Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
868 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1989
Pease Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 666 F.2d 1044, 1047-48 (6th Cir.1981); Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 523 F.2d 814, 820 (6th Cir.1975). … National Labor Relations Board v. Baja’s Place, 733 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.1984); National Labor Relations Board v. Cement Transport, Inc., 490 F.2d 1024 , 1029 n. 5 (6th Cir.1974).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Company
289 F.2d 931 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 11, 1961
This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order issued by it on March 25, 1960, against the above named respondent, its officers, agents, successors and assigns. … On March 21,1961, the Court handed down its decision enforcing as modified, the Board’s said order.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Fruehauf Corp.
577 F.2d 1038 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 5, 1978
In Lee v. Macon County Board of Education, 267 F.Supp. 458 (M.D.Ala.1967), aff’d sub nom. Wallace v. … Equitable remedies are fashioned in light of the need for adjusting and reconciling public and private needs, Brown v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedLocal Union 1392, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
786 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 1986
The Board’s inconsistency on this issue 2 *735 was resolved by the Supreme Court’s decision in Metropolitan Edison v. … The Board’s interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement is entitled to deference if it is reasonable and consistent with the policies of the Act. NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMontague v. National Labor Relations Board
698 F.3d 307 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 23, 2012
The Board reasoned: 6 No. 11–1256, Montague, et. al. v. … We accept the Board’s contention that there continues to be an Article III case or controversy on this basis. See NLRB v. Hiney Printing Co., 733 F.2d 1170, 1171 (6th Cir. 1984); NLRB v.
Cited 8 timesUnpublished801 F.2d 799 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 5, 1986
Sanders v. Ellington, 288 F.Supp. 937, 939 (M.D.Tenn.1968). 3 The district court found that six years elapsed after Brown v. … In the first Geier decision the district court found that fourteen years after Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublished93 F. App'x 790 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 2004
See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 739-41 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … See Baxter v. Rose, 305 F.3d 486, 488-89 (6th Cir.2002); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .
Cited 0 timesPublished917 F.2d 1305 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 1990
Michael Raymond WEATHERFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Director of State Prisons in Michigan; Gary H. Wells, Warden, Muskegon Correctional Facility; Edward F. … Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1385 (6th Cir.1987); Walker v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLaVon Moore v. Hiram Twp., Ohio
988 F.3d 353 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 2021
Brown v. City of Dayton, 730 N.E.2d 958, 962 (Ohio 2000). … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 990 (6th Cir. 1989) (en banc).
Cited 36 timesPublished336 F.2d 589 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 8, 1964
B. v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318, 322 , 82 S.Ct. 344 , 7 L.Ed.2d 312 . Respondent opposes summary enforcement on the asserted ground that it has complied fully with the order of the Board. … B. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 ; N. L. R. B. v. Toledo Desk and Fixture Co., 158 F.2d 426 (C.A.6).
Cited 13 timesPublished925 F.2d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1991
Hendricks, Steven Lewis Holly, Robert Taylor, Plaintiffs, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, Robert G. … See, e.g., Morgan v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. C. C. Lang & Son, Inc
212 F.2d 436 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 1954
212 F.2d 436 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. C. C. LANG & SON, Inc. No. 12152. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 21, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Washington, D. C., for petitioner. … with the Board's order; 3 And it appearing that compliance with the Board's order does not render the order moot nor constitute a defense to a petition for enforcement, National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublished919 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1990
HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ronald Stafford, Plaintiff, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Dan Bolden, Ronald E. Houseworth, Marjorie Vanochten, Raymond T. Toombs, Pete Vidor, Ray Palmer, Don Mason, Defendants-Appellees. … See Walker v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished35 F. App'x 156 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 2002
This court must affirm the Board’s decision if the Board has not committed any legal error or exceeded its statutory scope of review of the ALJ’s factual determina *158 tions. Glen Coal Co. v. … See Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812, 816 (6th Cir.1993). The ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is in accordance with the applicable law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Atlas Boot Manufacturing Company, Inc.
245 F.2d 239 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 17, 1957
B. v. Ford, 6 Cir., 170 F.2d 735, 738 ; N. L. R. B. v. Pacific Mills, 4 Cir., 207 F.2d 905, 907 ; that the alleged procedural eri’ors relied upon by respondent have no substantial merit, N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc., 6 Cir., 209 F.2d 645, 652-653 ; and that the scope of the Board’s order was not too broad under the circumstances of the case, May Department Stores Co. v. N. L. R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDobbs Houses, Inc., a Division of Squibb-Beechnut, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
443 F.2d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 1971
The union 1 had previously been certified by the NLRB after it won a Board-conducted election by 57 to 1. … In the alternative, the Employer moved that the Board certify the case to the National Mediation Board for a determination of its jurisdiction over the Employer and its employees under the Railway Labor Act.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDouglas A. Dowty v. Pioneer Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Utility Workers Union of America
770 F.2d 52 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 1985
See also, Cooper & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 467 , 98 S.Ct. 2454, 2457 , 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978). Brown Shoe Company v. … See Brown v. Duff Truck Lines, Inc., 557 F.Supp. 194, 196 (S.D.Ohio 1983).
Cited 41 timesPublishedJames Myers v. City of Centerville, Ohio
41 F.4th 746 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 21, 2022
In June 2020, the City’s Personnel Appeals Board affirmed Myers’s prior five-day suspension based on the Brannon Letter. … Brandenburg, 253 F.3d at 898 (quoting Brown v. City of Trenton, 867 F.2d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1989)). The distinction makes sense given the competing rationales.
Cited 65 timesPublished919 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 26, 1990
See Shelley v. Johnson, 849 F.2d 228, 230-31 (6th Cir.1988). Further, to the extent defendant Brown was named in his supervisory capacity, the complaint fails because defendant Brown may not be sued under 42 U.S.C. … See Birrell v. Brown, 867 F.2d 956, 959 (6th Cir.1989). Plaintiff's remaining claims lacked merit. 11 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna