Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

3.32s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

    434 F.2d 1318 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1970

    The supplemental decision and order of the Board are published at 180 N.L.R.B. No. 133. In N.L.R.B. v. J. H. Rutter Rex Mfg. … The cause was remanded to the Board for further findings with respect to the alleged violations of § 8(a) (5), in the light of N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • NLRB v. Intl Brotherhood

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 2008

    Hosp. v. NLRB, 328 F.3d 837, 844 (6th Cir. 2003)). … (quoting Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co. v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 190, 193 (6th Cir. 1972))). However, based on this record, we are unable to discern the factual and legal basis for the Board's determination of agency.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United Association of Journeymen v. National Labor Relations Board

    655 F.2d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 1981

    P 13,086 UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 388, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … ORDER 1 This matter is before the court upon cross-petitions for review and enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 245 N.L.R.B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Wilker Brothers Company, Inc.

    652 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1981

    The findings of the Board must be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence. See 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); DeLorean Cadillac, Inc. v. NLRB, 614 F.2d 554, 555 (6th Cir. 1980) (Order). … The choice between two conflicting views in the record is for the Board to decide. See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Automobile Club Of Michigan v. National Labor Relations Board

    610 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1979

    P 11,851 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF MICHIGAN, Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, Motor Land Insurance Company and Group Insurance Company of Michigan, Petitioners, v. … The Board predicated its conclusions on a finding that petitioner discharged certain employees for issuing a press release concerning a lawsuit which they had filed against petitioners.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Matthew Brown

    553 F. App'x 574 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 30, 2014

    Brown the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). … United States v. Marrero, 651 F.3d 453, 471 (6th Cir. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Howard Plating Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    635 F.2d 532 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 1980

    P 12,359 HOWARD PLATING INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Intervenor. … As stated in N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    602 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 19, 1979

    The Board has filed a cross-petition for the enforcement of its order. … B. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Falcon Coal Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    527 F.2d 570 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 1975

    P 11,360 FALCON COAL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 75--1162. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 22, 1975. Edgar A. Zingman, S. G. … election petition had been based had been solicited in violation of the doctrine of National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Pamela Brown

    1 F.3d 1242 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 30, 1993

    When she decided to take the bag on board the airplane, the skycap took her ticket folder, pulled off the claim check stub, and returned the ticket to her. … United States v.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • The Martin-Brower Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    623 F.2d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1980

    Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L. R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … In N.L.R.B. v. B. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Automatic Sprinklerr Corporation Of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    120 F.3d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 1997

    Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988-89 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965) (requiring reviewing courts to set aside interpretations of the Act by the Board that are inconsistent with statutory mandate, frustrate congressional … We review de novo the Board's interpretation of contract terms. Gratiot Community Hosp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Katrina Brown v. Ohio State University

    385 F. App'x 486 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 12, 2010

    Brown v. Ohio State Univ., 616 F. Supp. 2d 740 (S.D. Ohio 2009). This timely appeal followed. … Int’l Union v. Cummins, Inc., 434 F.3d 478, 483 (6th Cir. 2006).

    Cited 9 timesUnpublished
  • St. Regis Paper Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    623 F.2d 487 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1980

    Regis Paper Co., seeks review of a Board order directing the Company to reinstate fired employees. … (footnotes omitted) Hoover Co. v. N.L.R.B., 191 F.2d 380, 386 (6th Cir. 1951); accord, Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 213 F.2d 646 (6th Cir. 1954). Accordingly, we decline enforcement of the Board’s order. 1 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • David Brown v. City of Ecorse

    322 F. App'x 443 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 23, 2009

    ” (Waters v. … , Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesUnpublished
  • William B. Tanner Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    517 F.2d 982 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 1975

    TANNER COMPANY (formerly Pepper & Tanner, Inc.), Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Local Union No. 474, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (AFL-CIO), Intervenor. No. 74-2023. … PER CURIAM. 1 In an earlier decision in this proceeding, this court denied enforcement of the bargaining order of the Board. Pepper & Tanner, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 474 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grancare, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

    137 F.3d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 19, 1998

    Evidence which the Board has ignored but is directly relevant cannot be disregarded. Kurz-Kasch, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.2d 757, 761 (6th Cir.1989). … See, e.g., Caremore, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. C & E Stores, Inc.

    611 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1979

    P 12,538 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, Retail Clerks Union Local No. 1059 Retail Clerks International Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. C & E STORES, INC., C & E SUPERVALUE DIVISION, Respondent. No. 77-1563. … The Board, therefore, ordered the Company to bargain with the union without first holding an election, in accordance with NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. The Gates Rubber Company

    493 F.2d 249 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1974

    However one-sided such resolutions may have been, this attitude does not permit us to take over the function of the examiner or the Board, which affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s findings. N.L.R.B. v. … Notwithstanding the broadened powers of review given to us by the decision in Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yellow Springs Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. Ohio High School Athletic Ass'n

    647 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 28, 1981

    In Hoover v. Meiklejohn, supra, the district court distinguished Brown v. Board of Education, supra, and declared that female athletes would not suffer a stigma by being restricted to separate teams. … The Supreme Court’s reasoning in Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.