Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

1.23s

  • Willard Barrett Wilson v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

    878 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 2, 1989

    Indeed there have been exceptions to this general rule — most notably in the area of civil rights after the overruling of the “separate but equal” doctrine in Brown v. *851 Board of Education. 12 E.g., Christian v. … Parnell v. Rapides Parish School Board, 563 F.2d 180, 185 (5th Cir.1977). 14 . Society certainly includes the government.

    Cited 230 timesPublished
  • At&t, Inc. v. United States

    629 F.3d 505 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 4, 2011

    Board and the Commission may establish.” … Id. 11 Case: 09-50651 Document: 00511339601 Page: 12 Date Filed: 01/04/2011 No. 09-50651 In Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Laird v. Board of Trustees of the Institutions of Higher Learning of Mississippi

    721 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 22, 1983

    Defendant, the Board of Trustees of the Institution of Higher Learning of the State of Mississippi 1 (the “Board”) controls eight state universities, 2 including Mississippi State University (“MSU”). … Pappanastos v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, 615 F.2d 219, 221 (5th Cir.1980), states that the court’s task is to inquire whether “any state of facts may be conceived to justify” the challenged policy.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dennett v. The Main

    51 F. 954 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 20, 1892

    In Insurance Co. v. … In Leathers v. Blessing, 105 U.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • New Orleans Public Belt R. Commission for City of New Orleans v. Ward

    195 F.2d 829 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 10, 1952

    Co. v. Powe, 283 U.S. 401, 403 , 51 S.Ct. 498 , 75 L.Ed. 1142 ; Ohio ex rel. Seney v. Swift & Co., 260 U.S. 146, 151 , 43 S.Ct. 22 , 67 L.Ed. 176 ; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. … Co. v. Pedrick, 2 Cir., 184 F.2d 64 , 65-66; Despatch Shops v. Railroad Retirement Board, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 417, 418 ; Shields v. Utah Idaho Cent. R. Co., 305 U.S. 177 , 59 S.Ct 160 , 83 L.Ed. 111 ; U. S. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rea Express, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees

    459 F.2d 226 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 1, 1972

    Board of Trustees, 351 F.2d 183 , 188 (5th Cir. 1965), Chief Judge Brown aptly stated the test for determining whether a particular dispute is major or minor: At the outset several things may be briefly emphasized. … Firemen and Ehginemen v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • White Construction & Engineering Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    260 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 31, 1958

    prejudice from any of the alleged procedural defects leading up to the order of the district court or from the failure of the order expressly to include the “in lieu of” provision referred to by us in Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Louisiana

    9 F.3d 1159 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 10, 1993

    United States v. Louisiana, 751 F.Supp. 606 , 608 (E.D.La.1990). When Ayers was reversed, United States v. … United States v. Louisiana, 692 F.Supp. 642, 649-50 (E.D.La.1988); see also United States v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Joseph R. Delucca, Julio Enrique Perez, Jr. And Manuel Pozo, Defendants

    630 F.2d 294 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 24, 1980

    The co-defendants were Joseph DeLucca, Julio Perez, Manuel Pozo, Emilio DeLa Rosa and Kenneth Brown. … He learned from Kenneth Brown, a friend of his, that a lawyer in Miami by the name of Joseph DeLucca might be able to help him. DeLucca was Brown’s brother-in-law and had several clients in and around the Miami area.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • W. Horace Williams, Sr., and Viola Bloch Williams v. United States

    245 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 18, 1957

    BROWN, Circuit Judge. On a trial without a jury, the District Court held that Taxpayer, president, director and substantial stockholder (approximately 40%) of W. … What the Court held was that in a suit for refund, the burden is on the Taxpayer to show the tax wrongfully collected, Reinecke v. Spalding, 280 U.S. 227 , 50 S.Ct. 96 , 74 L.Ed. 385 ; Helvering v.

    Cited 584 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ross R. Barnett and Paul B. Johnson, Jr

    330 F.2d 369 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 9, 1963

    Brown v. United States, 1959, 359 U.S. 41, 51 , 79 S.Ct. 539, 547 , 3 L.Ed.2d 609 . See also, Offutt v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 11, 13, 14 , 75 S.Ct. 11 , 99 L.Ed. 11 ; Sacher v. … Bush, et al. v. Orleans Parish School Board, et al., 190 F.Supp. 861 (E.D.La.1960), aff’d sub nom.; Bush, et al. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • William Brown, Jr. v. Harris County, Texas

    409 F. App'x 728 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 15, 2010

    BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant v. … James, 577 F.3d at 617–18 (quoting Rhyne v.

    Cited 5 timesUnpublished
  • Carbo v. Board of Tax Assessors

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 5, 2026

    FDIC v. Firemen’s Ins. … See, e.g., Russell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Schaffer v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry (In Re Schaffer)

    515 F.3d 424 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 24, 2008

    Welfare v. Davenport, 495 U.S. 552, 565 (1993) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (“When analyzing a bankruptcy statute, the Court, of course, looks to its plain language.”); Kelly v. … Although other circuits, such as the Seventh Circuit in Zarzynski and the Fourth Circuit in United States Department of Housing & Urban Development v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alliance Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, John J. Daly

    782 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 12, 1986

    Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Fed. … Home Loan Bank Bd., 605 F.Supp. 502, 508 (C.D.Cal.1984) (reviewing the Bank Board’s appointment of a conservator under the arbitrary arid capricious standard); Tel. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v.

    Modified on other grounds by Alliance Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 790 F.2d 34 (1986)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • West Texas Utilities Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    201 F.2d 668 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 29, 1953

    The motion of the Board is denied for the reasons given in the memorandum denying the.motion of the Board in No. 13735, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 667 , that the Board has authority to proceed without an order. … The motion of the respondent is denied for the same reasons, without prejudice to its right to renew its motion if the Board fails to proceed as proposed. Motions denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hernandez Caruso v. Texas Medical Board

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 4, 2025

    Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)). But, “[e]ven so, mere conclusory allegations on a critical issue are insufficient.” Brown v. … Dist. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Marvin Irving Tamarkin v. Selective Service System, Local Draft Board, No. 47, Miami, Florida

    243 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 29, 1957

    Appellant claimed exemption as a conscientious objector, the claim was denied, he sought a review by the Appeal Board and by it he was again given a 1-A classification. … There is no right to a direct judicial review of orders of the draft boards. Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 , 75 S.Ct. 392 , 99 L.Ed. 428 ; Watkins v. Rupert, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 47 . The order is Affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Leonard D. Boswell v. Terrace Navigation Corporation

    384 F.2d 186 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 20, 1967

    These trimming hatches, 24" x 24" holes in the deck, were cut during the day by longshoremen other than Boswell and were covered by heavy “hatch boards.” … M/V Malay Maru, 5 Cir. 1967, 370 F.2d 906, 907-908 , Judge Brown said: The only real difficulty we have in the case is the sparseness or inadequacy of the Trial Court’s findings of fact long required in Admiralty, Rule 46%

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Warren G. COUSIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF HOUSTON MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

    648 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 16, 1981

    Hereford v. Huntsville Board of Education, 574 F.2d 268 (5th Cir. 1978); Hardy v. Por *297 ter, 546 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1977); Ayers v. Western Lines Consolidated School District, 555 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1977); Lee v. … Texas, 509 F.2d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1975); Thompson v. Madison County Board of Education, 496 F.2d 682 (5th Cir. 1974); Adams v. Rankin County Board of Education, 485 F.2d 324 , 327 n.2 (5th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.