Opinion

Marvin Irving Tamarkin v. Selective Service System, Local Draft Board, No. 47, Miami, Florida

  • 243 F.2d 108
  • 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2903
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Mar 29, 1957
Status
Published
On the bench
Tuttle, Jones, Brown
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 63.8%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant registered under the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 62 Stat. 604 , 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 451 et seq., with Local Draft Board No. 47 in Miami, Florida. He was classified 1-A. He was given a physical and mental examination, found acceptable and was so notified. Appellant claimed exemption as a conscientious objector, the claim was denied, he sought a review by the Appeal Board and by it he was again given a 1-A classification. Citing Selective Service Regulations, Sec. 1625.11 and Sec. 1628.10, 32 C.F.R. 331, 341, appellant claims he should have been given another physical examination before being ordered to report. He also asserts that Par. 18a, Army Reg. 601-270 and Par. 16, Local Board Memorandum of the Selective Service System, required that there be a waiting period of at least 21 days between a redetermination of his physical fitness and the date of his induction. The appellant brought suit against his Local Draft Board and its members, two of whom are sued by fictitious names, seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions against further procedures until he is given a physical examination and, if found physically qualified, a twenty-one day interval has elapsed. The district court entered an order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction and this appeal is from that order.

The operation of the Selective Service procedures cannot be impeded by injunctions in cases such as this. There is no right to a direct judicial review of orders of the draft boards. Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 , 75 S.Ct. 392 , 99 L.Ed. 428 ; Watkins v. Rupert, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 47 . The order is

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.