Case law

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Appellants-Appellees v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Appellees-Appellants. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Appellees-Appellants v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Appellants-Appellees

266 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 20, 1959

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, P. & W. R.

Allen M. Campbell Company General Contractors, Inc. v. Lloyd Wood Construction Co., Inc., and Hilary J. Sandoval

446 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 9, 1971

Udall v. Tallman, 1965, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 801 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 , reh. denied, 380 U.S. 989 , 85 S.Ct. 1325 , 14 L.Ed.2d 283 ; Bowles v. … Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Shaffer, 1970, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 371 , 424 F.2d 859 . However, in light of the contrary holding in Perkins v.

New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Warren C. Majoue

802 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 14, 1986

See, e.g., Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069, 1078 (5th Cir.1984); Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, 741 F.2d 273 , 279 n. 3 (9th Cir.1984); Three J Farms, Inc. v. … Alton Box Board Co., 609 F.2d 112, 115 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1090 , 63 L.Ed.2d 327 (1980). The only vehicle for relief from a remand order is the writ of mandamus.

M. F. Brown v. Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, Inc., in Personam, and Ss Lipscomb Lykes, in Rem

484 F.2d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 31, 1973

See McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20 , 75 S.Ct. 6 , 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954) ; United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 394 , 68 S.Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948) ; Ward v. … See, e. g., Gulf King Shrimp Company v. Wirtz, 407 F.2d 508, 515 (5th Cir. 1969) ; Compania Anonima Venezolano De Navegacion v.

United States v. Timothy Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 4, 2020

However, because Brown did not preserve his first two issues, we review them only for plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009); Howard, 766 F.3d at 428. … Moreover, Brown’s jurisdictional challenge is barred under the law of the case doctrine because it was rejected on direct appeal. See United States v.

National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. v. Computed Time Corporation, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

587 F.2d 790 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 15, 1979

B. v. Walton Mfg. … B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 , 413 (5th Cir. 1956). It is not the function of either the Court or the Board to second guess management decisions.

National Labor Relations Board v. E. L. Clark, Owner, Jim H. Pierce, Lessee of the Ashville-Whitney Nursing Home

468 F.2d 459 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 4, 1972

NLRB v. Ingram, 5 Cir. 1961, 273 F.2d 670 ; Birmingham Post Co. v. Brown, 5 Cir. 1954, 217 F.2d 127 . … Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp., 1943, 318 U.S. 80 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 ; Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1 Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 926 .

United States v. Investment Enterprises, Inc.

10 F.3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 17, 1993

Warner was a member of the board of CPLC, but he never attended any board meetings. … Intervenor v.

Delores Norwood, Cross-Appellants v. D. L. Harrison, Sr., Cross-Appellees

581 F.2d 518 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 5, 1978

Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co., 5 Cir. 1972, 467 F.2d 95, 97 (citations omitted). In exercising his discretion, the trial judge is directed by Johnson v. … Although we have the power to award attorneys’ fees, or to adjust any award we find inequitable, see Brown v. Culpepper, 5 Cir. 1977, 559 F.2d 274 ; Davis v.

United States v. Timothy Brown

502 F. App'x 396 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 18, 2012

United States v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1390, 1400 (5th Cir. 1996). … Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2692 (2010).

29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 398, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,876 New Orleans Steamship Association v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Orleans Steamship Association

680 F.2d 23 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 6, 1982

Before BROWN, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. … Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946); New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. v. Brown, 507 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1975), and that relevancy, at that stage, is to be interpreted expansively, see Burns v.

In the Matter of David Lee Vickers, Bankrupt. David Lee Vickers v. Home Indemnity Company, Inc.

546 F.2d 1149 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 9, 1977

See Morneau v. American Oil Company, 272 So.2d 313 (La. *1151 Sup.Ct.1973). The provocation thus provided no legal excuse for the appellant’s actions. … See Vidrine v. Michigan Mullers Mutual Insurance Co., 263 La. 300 , 268 So.2d 233 (1972); Marquette Casualty Co. v. Brown, 235 La. 245 , 103 So.2d 269 (1958); Board of Commissioners v.

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

266 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 20, 1959

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad Company, supra. … The panel being composed of Circuit Judges Tuttle, Jones, and Brown. .

Charter Limousine, Inc. v. Dade County Board Of County Commissioners

678 F.2d 586 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 17, 1982

678 F.2d 586 CHARTER LIMOUSINE, INC., a/k/a Carey of Florida, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … Wilson Co. v. U. S., 580 F.2d 33 (2 Cir. 1978); see also, Coca-Cola v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry.

Brown Express, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Alamo Express, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Common Carrier Conference Irregular Route v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

607 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 30, 1979

607 F.2d 695 BROWN EXPRESS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. The UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Respondents. ALAMO EXPRESS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. … Petitioners also sought administrative review by the ICC of the Board's action. On April 17, 1979, Vice Chairman Brown revoked the grants of ETA to both Texas-Oklahoma Express, Inc., and Ryder Truck Lines Co., Inc.

Battle v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company

493 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 25, 1974

See Beckman v. … Co. v.

Prudential Insurance Company of America, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross

661 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 16, 1981

The Board has not yet ruled on the question of waiver, but the Board’s General Counsel has issued a formal opinion holding that a waiver would be valid. … See NLRB v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee, 415 U.S. 322 , 94 S.Ct. 1099 , 39 L.Ed.2d 358 (1974). Compare NLRB v. Mid-States Metal Products, Inc., 403 F.2d 702 (5th Cir. 1968) with Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Smith Alarm Systems and Central Station Alarm Company

524 F.2d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 17, 1975

In Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. … In answering this question, we are required to examine the record as a whole to see if there is substantial evidence in it to support the Board’s determination. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pine Manor Nursing Home, Inc.

578 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 18, 1978

B. v. … B. v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co., 392 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1968). Based upon those findings of fact, the employer clearly violated the act in the particulars alleged and found to be correct by the board.

Sreeram v. L S U Med Ctr Sport

188 F.3d 314 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 22, 1999

See, e.g., Brown v. CSC Logic, Inc., 82 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 1995). … Krystek v. University of Southern Mississippi, 164 F.3d 251, 256 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing Brown, 82 F.3d at 655.)