Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.99s
National Labor Relations Board v. Iron Castings, Inc.
237 F.2d 344 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 12, 1956
respondent has failed to file its brief as called for in Rule 38(1) of this Court; It is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedHook v. Brevard County Florida Board of Supervisors
621 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 24, 1980
621 F.2d 438 Hook v. Brevard County Florida Board of Supervisors 79-3411 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 6/24/80 1 M.D.Fla. VACATED AND REMANDED
Cited 0 timesPublishedBurns v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
533 F.2d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 2, 1976
533 F.2d 1135 Burns v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board No. 75-3849 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 6/2/76 M.D.La., 530 F.2d 1201
Cited 0 timesPublishedD Jacobs v. U. S. Board of Parole
529 F.2d 1030 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 10, 1976
529 F.2d 1030 * d Jacobs v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-3453 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 2/10/76 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD Norman v. United States Board of Parole
483 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 3, 1973
483 F.2d 1403 * d Norman v. United States Board of Parole 73-1804 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit Oct. 3, 1973 1 W.D.Tex. * Summary Calendar cases; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Gilvin-Terrill, Inc.
338 F.2d 971 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 29, 1964
This is a petition for the enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board arising out of a finding by the Board that the respondent company had violated section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act 1 by refusing to … We are not convinced that the Board abused its discretion in determining the issue as to the appropriate bargaining unit. The order will be enforced. 1 . 29 U.S.G.A. § 151 et seq.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Modern Optics, Incorporated
201 F.2d 513 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 12, 1953
The motion of the National Labor Relations Board for the summary entry of a decree upon the transcript of record is granted, and a decree for the enforcement of the Board’s order will be made accordingly, and may he presented
Cited 0 timesPublishedMagnolia Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
135 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 28, 1943
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Croft Metals, Inc.
771 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 6, 1985
PER CURIAM: Finding the decision by the National Labor Relations Board fully supported by the record, and concurring in each factual finding and legal conclusion therein, the same is ENFORCED.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD Holiday v. U. S. Board of Parole
524 F.2d 1230 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 26, 1975
524 F.2d 1230 * d Holiday v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-2662 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 11/26/75 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD Weldow v. Geneva County Board of Education
505 F.2d 1303 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 26, 1974
505 F.2d 1303 * d Weldow v. Geneva County Board of Education 74-3158 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 12/26/74 1 M.D.Ala. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD Lackey v. U. S. Board of Parole
498 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 5, 1974
498 F.2d 910 * d Lackey v. U. S. Board of Parole 74-1452 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/5/74 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD Chance v. U. S. Board of Parole
468 F.2d 950 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 9, 1972
468 F.2d 950 d Chance v. U. S. Board of Parole 72-1511 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit May 9, 1972 1 E.D.Tex.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Allegheny Beverage Corp.
424 F.2d 1366 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 27, 1970
The § 8(a) (1), (3) and (5) violations found by the Board are amply supported by the facts considered on the record as a whole. … It not appearing from the record in this court that the matters involved are moot, that question should be addressed to the Board. Enforced.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Singleton Packing Corp.
424 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 30, 1970
Cited 0 timesPublishedTrade Winds Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
424 F.2d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 29, 1970
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Riley Aeronautics Corp.
377 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 6, 1967
PER CURIAM: The opposition of the Respondent to the Board’s petition for enforcement is so devoid of any possible merit that the Court, upon completion of the Board’s argument, ordered from the bench that the order be enforced
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Dubois Chemicals, Inc.
327 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 24, 1964
We find no basis to upset the essential findings of the Board. The Order of the Board will be enforced.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Arnall Manufacturing Company
196 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 6, 1952
The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, the Board’s order. … The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this Court’s decree will not be required to be redone, and
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdward C. Kelley v. The Railroad Retirement Board
180 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 20, 1950
KELLEY, Petitioner, v. The RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 13045. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. March 20, 1950. Petition for Review of Decision of the Railroad Retirement Board. Robt. C.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna