Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

1.99s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Iron Castings, Inc.

    237 F.2d 344 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 12, 1956

    respondent has failed to file its brief as called for in Rule 38(1) of this Court; It is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hook v. Brevard County Florida Board of Supervisors

    621 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 24, 1980

    621 F.2d 438 Hook v. Brevard County Florida Board of Supervisors 79-3411 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 6/24/80 1 M.D.Fla. VACATED AND REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burns v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board

    533 F.2d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 2, 1976

    533 F.2d 1135 Burns v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board No. 75-3849 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 6/2/76 M.D.La., 530 F.2d 1201

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D Jacobs v. U. S. Board of Parole

    529 F.2d 1030 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 10, 1976

    529 F.2d 1030 * d Jacobs v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-3453 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 2/10/76 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D Norman v. United States Board of Parole

    483 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 3, 1973

    483 F.2d 1403 * d Norman v. United States Board of Parole 73-1804 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit Oct. 3, 1973 1 W.D.Tex. * Summary Calendar cases; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Gilvin-Terrill, Inc.

    338 F.2d 971 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 29, 1964

    This is a petition for the enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board arising out of a finding by the Board that the respondent company had violated section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act 1 by refusing to … We are not convinced that the Board abused its discretion in determining the issue as to the appropriate bargaining unit. The order will be enforced. 1 . 29 U.S.G.A. § 151 et seq.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Modern Optics, Incorporated

    201 F.2d 513 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 12, 1953

    The motion of the National Labor Relations Board for the summary entry of a decree upon the transcript of record is granted, and a decree for the enforcement of the Board’s order will be made accordingly, and may he presented

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    135 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 28, 1943

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Croft Metals, Inc.

    771 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 6, 1985

    PER CURIAM: Finding the decision by the National Labor Relations Board fully supported by the record, and concurring in each factual finding and legal conclusion therein, the same is ENFORCED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D Holiday v. U. S. Board of Parole

    524 F.2d 1230 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 26, 1975

    524 F.2d 1230 * d Holiday v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-2662 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 11/26/75 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D Weldow v. Geneva County Board of Education

    505 F.2d 1303 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 26, 1974

    505 F.2d 1303 * d Weldow v. Geneva County Board of Education 74-3158 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 12/26/74 1 M.D.Ala. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D Lackey v. U. S. Board of Parole

    498 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 5, 1974

    498 F.2d 910 * d Lackey v. U. S. Board of Parole 74-1452 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/5/74 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D Chance v. U. S. Board of Parole

    468 F.2d 950 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 9, 1972

    468 F.2d 950 d Chance v. U. S. Board of Parole 72-1511 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit May 9, 1972 1 E.D.Tex.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Allegheny Beverage Corp.

    424 F.2d 1366 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 27, 1970

    The § 8(a) (1), (3) and (5) violations found by the Board are amply supported by the facts considered on the record as a whole. … It not appearing from the record in this court that the matters involved are moot, that question should be addressed to the Board. Enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Singleton Packing Corp.

    424 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 30, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trade Winds Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    424 F.2d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 29, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Riley Aeronautics Corp.

    377 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 6, 1967

    PER CURIAM: The opposition of the Respondent to the Board’s petition for enforcement is so devoid of any possible merit that the Court, upon completion of the Board’s argument, ordered from the bench that the order be enforced

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Dubois Chemicals, Inc.

    327 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 24, 1964

    We find no basis to upset the essential findings of the Board. The Order of the Board will be enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Arnall Manufacturing Company

    196 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 6, 1952

    The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, the Board’s order. … The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this Court’s decree will not be required to be redone, and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edward C. Kelley v. The Railroad Retirement Board

    180 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 20, 1950

    KELLEY, Petitioner, v. The RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 13045. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. March 20, 1950. Petition for Review of Decision of the Railroad Retirement Board. Robt. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.