Case law

Stilwell v. United States Marshals of Baltimore, Md.

192 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 27, 1951

While subject to the conditions of this “good time” release, he was found guilty of violation of law in the State of Maryland and the conditional release was revoked by the Parole Board on that ground and he was confined … See Bragg v. Huff, 4 Cir., 118 F.2d 1006 ; Hall v. Welch, 4 Cir., 185 F.2d 525 . Affirmed.

Miller v. Cumberland County Bd. of Educ.

986 F.2d 1414 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 16, 1993

MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; David Dalton; Marshall Faircloth; Miltin Yarboro; Michael Boose; Thomas Council; Marta Bullard; Maureen Clark; Juanita Gonzales; Mary E. … Miller v. Cumberland County Bd. of Educ., No. CA-91-36-3-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 21 & 25, 1992).

Kalu v. Mukasey

262 F. App'x 545 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 29, 2008

PER CURIAM: Daniel Okorie Kalu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen his immigration proceedings. … We further find that we lack jurisdiction to review Kalu’s claim that the Board should have exercised its sua sponte power to reopen his removal proceedings. Ali v.

Cuthbertson v. Biggers Brothers, Inc.

702 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 1983

Brown Worthy Brown Worthy began working for the defendant in 1963 as a warehouse laborer. Within a year, he started to drive the defendant’s trucks, and by 1968 he was promoted to relief driver. … V.

Doherty v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

30 F. App'x 251 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 11, 2002

Desmond Doherty, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, appeals from the decision and order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his application for suspension of deportation. … See Appiah v. U.S. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857 , 121 S.Ct. 140 , 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000). For this reason, we deny Doherty’s petition for review and affirm the decision of the Board.

Trading Associates Corp. v. Magruder

112 F.2d 779 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 10, 1940

Schafer v. Helvering, 299 U.S. 171 , 57 S.Ct. 148 , 81 L.Ed. 101 ; Hammitt v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 494 ; Seeley v. Helvering, 2 Cir., 77 F.2d 323 ; Wilson v. … Commissioner, 10 *782 Cir., 76 F.2d 476 ; Leach Corporation v. Blacklidge, D.C., 23 F.Supp. 622 . This line of decisions has also been followed in a number of cases decided by the Board of Tax Appeals.

Stepney v. Beckwith

392 F. App'x 167 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 23, 2010

See Stepney v. Beckwith, No. 8:09-cv-00771-MBS, 2010 WL 293786 (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2010); 2009 WL 1357225 (May 12, 2009).

Denrick Eric Brown v. G. Bryant, Nurse Lieutenant Townsandson Sergeant Anderson

981 F.2d 1250 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 17, 1992

Denrick Eric BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. BRYANT, Nurse; Lieutenant Townsandson; Sergeant Anderson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6954. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … PER CURIAM: 1 Denrick Eric Brown filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v.

Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 7, 2025

United Haulers Ass’n, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Mgmt. Auth., 550 U.S. 330, 338 (2007); see also Brown v. … Brown, 561 F.3d at 363 (alteration in original) (quoting Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970)).

In the Matter of Diversified Mountaineer Corporation, Debtor v. Carl M. Duttine, Trustee of Diversified Mountaineer Corporation v. Nick Savas

612 F.2d 841 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 28, 1979

Duttine v. Savas, 455 F.Supp. 153 (S.D.W.Va. 1978). … Duttine v. Savas, 455 F.Supp. 153 (S.D.W.Va. 1978). Affirmed. 1 . They are Nick Savas, Emanuel A. Kostas, Ruth Fox Turner, J. Rexford White and Willard L. Phillips. 2 .

Atlantic States Construction Company v. Robert E. Lee & Co., Inc. Of South Carolina, and Robert M. Lee

406 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 5, 1969

Bruce Construction Corp. v. United States, 242 F.2d 873, 875 (5th Cir.1957). … See, e. g., American Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. London & Edinburgh Ins. Co., 354 F.2d 214 (4th Cir. 1965). 3 . See, e. g., Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., 375 F.2d 670 (4th Cir. 1967). 4 .

United States v. Gaines

668 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 2012

See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). … See Brown, 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 . We applied these principles in United States v.

Worku v. Ashcroft

103 F. App'x 767 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 4, 2004

Brown, MAGGIO & KATTAR, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Senior Litigation Counsel, William K. … Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). To qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate “a clear probability of persecution.” INS v.

Titang v. Gonzales

224 F. App'x 282 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 19, 2007

Finally, in No. 06-1677, Titang challenges the Board’s denial of her motion to reopen. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. INS v. … A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304 , 308 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc). We will reverse the Board’s denial of such a motion only if the denial is “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.” Barry, 445 F.3d at 745 .

Singh v. Mukasey

260 F. App'x 598 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 7, 2008

PER CURIAM: Tajinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings. … . § 1003.2 (a) (2007) (“The decision to grant or deny a motion to reopen ... is within the discretion of the Board.... ”); Barry v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Amfm of Summers County, Incorporated, Amfm of Summers County, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

89 F.3d 829 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 20, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AMFM OF SUMMERS COUNTY, INCORPORATED, Respondent. AMFM OF SUMMERS COUNTY, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 95-1812, 95-1323. … See NLRB v. Low Kit Mining Co., 3 F.3d 720, 728 (4th Cir.1993); American Thread Co. v. NLRB, 631 F.2d 316, 321 (4th Cir.1980).

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Michael Firth Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

363 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 5, 2004

WIDENER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff employer, Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company (Newport), seeks review of the decision of the Benefits Review Board (the Board) in Firth v. … The Director appealed this decision to the Board. The Board reversed, finding that the Director was entitled to the absolute defense and, therefore, that Newport could not receive § 908(f) relief. Firth v.

Frank Chervan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

833 F.2d 1004 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 19, 1987

FRANK CHERVAN, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 87-3566. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: Nov. 3, 1987. Decided: Nov. 19, 1987. … See NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432 (1967); NLRB v. A.S. Asbell Co., 624 F.2d 506, 510 (4 Cir.1980). The information requested by the Union is unquestionably relevant to its duty to handle employee grievances.

Lytle v. Doyle

326 F.3d 463 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 14, 2003

Carter v. Morris, 164 F.3d 215, 218 (4th Cir.1999). … Board of Com’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409-10 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Theodore E. Powell v. Franklin County School Board

813 F.2d 402 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 21, 1986

POWELL, Appellant, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellee. No. 84-2132. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 2, 1986. Decided Aug. 21, 1986. … See Hashemi v.